Skip to main content

Ergonomics and Regulation: The Case of Job Rotation in a Brazilian Slaughterhouse

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 819))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1694 Accesses

Abstract

In April 2013, Regulatory Standard 36 was published in Brazil, concerning health and safety at work in slaughtering and meat processing companies, aiming to establish, among other things, standards for the implementation of job rotation. This industry has expanded in Brazil, which is currently the world’s largest exporter of beef. This work presents partial data from a survey carried out in a cattle slaughterhouse located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The purpose of this communication is to present the acceptance of the slaughterworkers regarding the rotation of posts imposed by the legislation, as well as to identify the determinants of the work. According to the data obtained, the slaughtering sector is composed of 88 workers, of which 91% are male and 47% aged 40 to 54 years. The most common causes of absenteeism in last two years were inguinal and abdominal hernias. The most significant determinants of labor are: product variation (cattle differences), cadence and irregular work rate, and physical and psychological demands. Knives, the main work tools, require time to be cleaned and sharpened. Concerning acceptance of the rotation, 30% of the workers are in favor, as they will learn new activities, and 70% are contrary as they believe they will be more exposed to work accidents in activities for which they do not have specific skills. It is concluded that detailed analysis of the posts, with the effective participation of the workers, are the main steps to comply with current legislation and preserve health at work and reduce the number of accidents and occupational diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ABIEC – Brazilian Association of Meat Exporters (2017). http://www.abiec.com.br

  2. BRASIL (2013) Portaria MTE n.º 555, de 18 de abril de 2013. Institui o Ministério de Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho. Diário oficial [da União], Brasília, DF, 19 April

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vasconcellos MC, Pignatti MG, Pignati WA (2009) Employment and work accidents in the refrigeration industry in agribusiness expansion areas, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Saúde&Sociedade 18(4):662–672

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henchion MM, McCarthy M, Resconi VC (2017) Beef quality attributes: a systematic review of consumer perspectives. Meat Sci 128:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tappin DC, Bentley TA, Vitalis A (2008) The role of contextual factors for musculoskeletal disorders in the New Zealand meat processing industry. Ergonomics 51:1576–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Falardeau A, Vézina N (2002) Rotationdes postes, assignationtemporaire et impact des absences dans une usined’abattage et de transformation Du porc, Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur Le travail et La santé, 4-2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richard P (2002) Analyse ergonomique et measures biomécaniques dans un abattoir de porcs. Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur Le travail et La santé [Enligne], 4-1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coutarel F, Dugué B, ET Daniellou F (2003) Interroger l’organisation Du travail au regard desmarges de manoeuvre en conception et em fonctionnement. La rotation est-elle une solutionauxTMS?, Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur Le travail et La santé [Enligne], 5-2

    Google Scholar 

  9. Neto JMC et al (2011) Avaliação da rotatividade pessoal em indústria de processamento de carnes com intervenção ergonômica no processo. Encontro Internacional de Produção Científica. Acesso em 22 Nov 2013

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ouellet S, Vézina N, Malo JL, Chartrand J (2003) L’implantation de larotation de postes: un exemple de démarche préalable, Perspectives interdisciplinairessurletravail et lasanté, 5-2. http://pistes.revues.org/3322

  11. Rocha R, Figrueiredo V, Baptista AK (2016) Knowledge Management for Counterbalancing the Process of Loss of Skills at Work: A Practical Study

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vilela RAG, Almeida IM (2012) Mendes RWB Da vigilância para prevenção de acidentes de trabalho: contribuição da ergonomia da atividade. Ciência&SaúdeColetiva 17(10):2817–2830

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vogel K et al (2013) Improving meat cutters’ work: changes and effects following an Intervention. Appl Ergon 44(6):996–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo – FAPESP, for the financial support. Process number: 2017/05299-5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iracimara de Anchieta Messias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Anchieta Messias, I., Nascimento, A. (2019). Ergonomics and Regulation: The Case of Job Rotation in a Brazilian Slaughterhouse. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics