Skip to main content

Case Study in Ergonomics Problem Solving Process at a Beer Distribution Company

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

The ergonomic problem-solving process is a uniformly consistent approach to address challenges presented in various environments. Steps include: (1) identification, (2) analysis, (3) brainstorm of possible solutions, (4) implementation (prototypes), and (5) evaluation. This process was conducted at a distribution company that delivered beer to commercial establishments. Less than 200 employees worked at the company. The first three steps of the ergonomic problem-solving process were carried out with warehouse and delivery workers. A safety climate survey was administered. Following data collection (delivery and warehouse tasks observations and a safety climate survey), employees participated in a workshop. The first session introduced work design principles (including product quality, customer service, efficiency, decrease risk of injury, and improve quality of work life) and how they aligned with the company’s goals. Concepts were communicated in an interactive setting. During the second session, two separate groups discussed challenges specific to warehouse or delivery workers. Videos gathered during data collection were shared with workers. Researchers facilitated brainstorm sessions to address challenges presented in those videos. Identified challenges included errors in building orders at the warehouse to delivering keg up stairs and around tight spaces. One suggestion included shifting emphasis from individual pick-rates to team accuracy to stress accuracy over speed. Another solution from brainstorming involved standardizing communication policies with clients. This project covered the first three stages of the ergonomics solution development process (identification, analysis, and brainstorming possible solutions). Further collaboration with the company will incorporate the prototype, implementation and evaluation steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abaraogu U, Okafor C, Ezeukwu AO, Igwe SE (2015) Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal discomfort and its impact on activity: a survey of beverage factory workers in Eastern Nigeria. Work 52(3):627–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beus JM, Payne SC, Bergman ME, Arthur W (2010) Safety climate and injuries: an examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. J Appl Psychol 95(4):713–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewers Association (2017) Craft beer in review U.S. hits record-breaking 6,000 breweries in operation. Brewers Association [Press release]. https://www.brewersassociation.org/press-releases/2017-craft-beer-review/

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2011) Injuries, illnesses, and fatalities. Nonfatal cases involving days away from work: selected characteristics (2003–2010). US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Safety and Health Statistics Program, Washington, DC. http://www.bls.gov/iif/data.htm

  • Elden M (1986) Sociotechnical systems and ideas and public policy in Norway: empowering participation through worker-managed change. J Appl Behav Sci 22:239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagberg M, Silverstein B, Wells R, Smith MJ, Hendrick HW, Carayonn P, Perussen M (1995) Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Imada AS (1991) The rationale and tools of participatory ergonomics. In: Imada AS, Noro K (eds) participatory ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 30–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (2001) Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: low back and upper extremities. National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel BA, Schurman SJ, Hugentoblr MK (1992) Conducting action research: relationships between organizational members and researchers. J Appl Behav Sci 28(1):74–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T, Strickfaden M, Kumar S (2005) Physical demands analysis of occupational tasks in neighborhood pubs. Appl Ergon 36(5):535–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen MJ, Handa A, Veluswamy P, Bhatt M (2005) The effect of pallet distance on torso kinematics and low back disorder risk. Ergonomics 48(8):949–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130500182007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marras WS (2000) Occupational low back disorder causation and control. Ergonomics 43(7):880–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marras WS, Granata KP, Davis KG, Allread WG, Jorgensen MJ (1997) Spine loading and probability of low back disorder risk as a function of box location on a pallet. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 7(4):323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath C (2003) ‘Family businesses distributing America’s beverage’: managing government relations in the National Beer Wholesalers Association. J Public Aff 3(3):212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal A, Griffin MA (2008) A study of lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol 91(4):946–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North American Industry Classification System (n.d.) NAICS Code 424810 Beer and Ale Merchant Wholesalers. https://siccode.com/en/naicscodes/424810/beer-and-ale-merchant-wholesalers-2

  • Plamondon A, Larivière C, Denis D, Mercheri H, Natasia I (2017) Difference between male and female workers lifting the same relative load when palletizing boxes. Appl Ergon 60:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope MH, Anderson GBJ, Frymoyer JW, Chaffin DB (1991) Occupational low back pain: assessment, treatment, and prevention. Mosby-Year Book Inc., St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Pramitasari R, Pitaksanurat S, Phajan T, Laohasiriwong W (2015) Association between ergonomic risk factors and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in beverage factory. In: Proceedings international seminar and workshop on public health action. Faculty of Health Sciences Dian Nuswantoro University, Semarang, Indonesia, pp 196–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Punnett L, Wegman DH (2004) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putz-Anderson V, Bernard BP, Burt SE, Cole LL, Fairfield-Estill C, Fine Tanaka S (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors (Rep.). In: Bernard BP (ed.). National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey T, Davis KG, Kotowski SE, Anderson VP, Waters T (2014) Reduction of spinal loads through adjustable interventions at the origin and destination of palletizing tasks. Hum Factors 56(7):1222–1234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814528356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrance JC, Cook TM (2000) The use of participatory action research and ergonomics in the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the newspaper industry. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 15(3):255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schurman SJ (1996) Making the “new American workplace” safe and healthy: a joint labor-management-researcher approach. Am J Ind Med 29(4):373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjøgaard G, Sejersted OM, Winkel J, Smolander K, Westgaard J, Westgaard RH (1993) Exposure assessment and mechanisms of pathogenesis in work-related musculoskeletal disorders: significant aspects in the documentation of risk factors. In: Johansen O, Johansen C (eds) Work and health: scientific basis of progress in the working environment. European Commission, Directorate-General V, Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ (1993) Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36(7):749–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors declare no conflict of interest. This study and publication was supported in part by the Grant T42OH009229 (Mountain and Plains Education Research Center), funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC or the Department of Health and Human Services. Additional funding for this project was from the CDC through the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety, grant number U54 OH008085. The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC or NIOSH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelsie Daigle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Daigle, K. et al. (2019). Case Study in Ergonomics Problem Solving Process at a Beer Distribution Company. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics