Biomechanical Methodology for Evaluating Seat Comfort During Long Term Driving According to the Variation of Seat Back Angle

  • Dong Hyun Kim
  • Seohyun Kim
  • Sung Chul Kim
  • Sung Hyun Yoo
  • Young Jin Jung
  • Han Sung KimEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 820)


The aim of this study is to suggest a biomechanical methodology for evaluating seat comfort during long term driving with a use of driving stimulator. Recent modern car seat has become increasingly complexed and sophisticated with ongoing seat discomfort problems. Consumers’ demands for better seat comfort have also increased but most of them still choose car seats in the wrong way. Previous researches have recommended quantifying overall car seat discomfort based on questionnaire, EMG, and FEM etc. However, it is difficult to find successful objective evaluation methods in both in literature or in actual situations. Six males were recruited to participate in a laboratory study. All participants performed three trials separated by three different seat back angles (87°, 97°, and 107°) and each trial was conducted on different days. Each trial was consisted of 120 min of continuous driving on the driving simulator. Participants were recorded using Kinect v2 with a full body and pressure at both seat pan and back were measured to allow the investigator to analyze their postures. The results for each seat condition were analyzed through unpaired t-test in order to acquire statistical significance (P < 0.05). As expected, the overall discomfort rating increased over time, especially for neck and low back. Also, at 87° and 107°, the overall discomfort rating was higher than 97°. In addition, over time, we found an increase in pressure in both seat back and seat pan. These results suggest that a new biomechanical method could be an alternative for evaluating car seat comfort for long-term driving.


Seat comfort Biomechanics Kinect v2 Lumbar moment 


  1. 1.
    Harrison DD et al (2000) Sitting biomechanics, part II: optimal car driver’s seat and optimal driver’s spinal model. J Manip Physiol Ther 23(1):37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hirao A et al (2006) Development of a new driving posture focused on biomechanical loads. SAE, 2006-01-1302Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhise VD (2012) Ergonomics in the automotive design process, 1st edn. CPC Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pope MH et al (2002) Spine ergonomics. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 4:49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zenk R et al (2012) Technical note: spine load in automotive seating. Appl Ergon 43:290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringYonsei UniversityWon-juKorea

Personalised recommendations