Abstract
A survey of certified ergonomics professionals was conducted in 2017 by NIOSH researchers to understand the types of basic tools, observational methods, and direct measurement methods used by ergonomics professionals. This survey served to update findings from a previous survey of Certified Professional Ergonomists (CPEs) in the United States that was reported in 2005. The 2017 survey was expanded to include ergonomists certified in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Great Britain, and Ireland. The 2005 survey content was used with the addition of technologies that were not available in 2005 (e.g., mobile devices and mobile applications) and tools likely to be of use by ergonomists outside the U.S. Overall, the participation rate was 34% (405 of 1,192 surveys that reached recipients) which was lower than the response rate of 53% for the 2005 survey. This may have been related to differences in the receipt format (postal versus internet) between the two surveys. The results for U.S. ergonomists were similar across both surveys for the most part, but there were also a number of differences. Differences across country/region were pronounced for some items, but similar for basic tools and several popular assessment tools. Overall, the results suggest that ergonomists gravitate towards inexpensive and efficient tools and methods. The strengths and limitations are discussed with suggestions for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Dempsey PG, McGorry RW, Maynard WS (2005) A survey of tools and methods used by certified professional ergonomists. Appl Ergon 36:489–503
Shorrock ST, Williams CA (2016) Human factors and ergonomics methods in practice: three fundamental constraints. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 17:468–482
Stanton N, Young M (1998) Is utility in the mind of the beholder? A study of ergonomics methods. Appl Ergon 29(1):41–54
Takala EP, Pehkonen I, Forsman M, Hansson G-Å, Mathiassen SE, Neumann WP, Sjøgaard G, Veiersted KB, Westgaard RH, Winkel J (2010) Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 36(1):3–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dempsey, P.G., Lowe, B.D., Jones, E. (2019). An International Survey of Tools and Methods Used by Certified Ergonomics Professionals. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 820. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96083-8_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96083-8_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96082-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96083-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)