Skip to main content

How Holistic Approaches of Activity Analysis in Ergonomics Renew Training Design?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 821))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This communication presents the benefit of holistic approaches of work analysis in ergonomics and professional didactics in the field of occupational training. The research-intervention processes discussed have the originality aiming to conduct jointly learning questions, conditions of training and prevention of occupational risks. Its specificities are presented from three research-interventions in the field of aeronautics industry, agriculture and education. We stress questions that are emerging, such as the design of digital tools for training, the importance of subjective commitment at work and the identity transformations and we precise how the holistic approach advocated, based on a model of operator development that articulates mastery of tasks and work and the construction of health and safety over the long term, may be used to treat these questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The “Natural Interactions, Knowledge, Immersive system for Training in Aeronautics” (NIKITA) research project, funded by the Agence National pour la Recherche (ANR) (http://www.emissive.fr/nikita/).

References

  1. Rabardel P, Teiger C, Laville A, Rey P, Desnoyer L (1991) Ergonomics work analysis and training. In: Queinnec Y, Daniellou F (eds) Design for everyone. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 1738–1740

    Google Scholar 

  2. Teiger C, Montreuil M (1996) The foundations and contributions of ergonomics work analysis in training programmes. Saf Sci 3(2–3):81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cloutier E, Ledoux E, Fournier P-S (2012) Knowledge transmission in light of recent transformations in the workplace. Relations industrielles/Ind Relat 67(2):304–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Falzon P La (1998) construction des connaissances en ergonomie: éléments d’épistémologie. In: Dessaigne M-F, Gaillard I (eds) Des Évolutions En Ergonomie. Octarès, Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dul J, Bruder R, Buckle P, Carayon P, Falzon P, Marras WS, Wilson JR, van der Doelen B (2012) A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics 55(4):377–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lundberg J (2015) Situation awareness systems, states and processes: a holistic framework. Theoret Issues Ergon Sci 16(5):447–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2015.1008601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24(4):602–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tourmen C, Holgado O, Métral J, Mayen P, Olry P (2017) The Piagetian Schème: a framework to study professional learning through conceptualization. Vocations Learn 10(3):343–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guérin F, Laville A, Daniellou F, Duraffourg J, Kerguelen A (2007) Understanding and transforming work. The practice of ergonomics. ANACT, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flick U, Von Kardoff E, Steinke I (2004) A companion to qualitative research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mollo V, Falzon P (2004) Auto-and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. Appl Ergon 35(6):531–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Delgoulet C, Boccara V, Carpentier K, Lourdeaux D (2015) How designing a virtual environment for professional training from an activity framework? Dialog between ergonomists and computer scientists. In: Proceedings 19th triennal congress of the IEA, 9–14 August 2015, Melbourne (Australia). http://ergonomics.uq.edu.au/iea/proceedings/Index_files/papers/325.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2018

  13. Sonderegger A, Sauer J (2009) The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effects on user performance and perceived usability. Appl Ergon 41(3):403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boccara V, Delgoulet C (2015) Works analysis in training design. How ergonomics helps to orientate upstream design of virtual training environments. Activités 12(2):137–158 http://activites.revues.org/1109. Accessed 16 Apr 2018

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olry P, Vidal-Gomel C (2011) Conception de formation professionnelle continue: tensions croisées et apports de l’ergonomie, de la didactique professionnelle et des pratiques d’ingénierie. Activités 8(2):115–149 https://journals.openedition.org/activites/2604. Accessed 16 Apr 2018

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ouellet S, Vézina N Activity analysis and workplace training: an ergonomic perspective. In: Filliettaz L, Billett S (eds) Francophone perspectives of learning through work. Springer, Cham, pp 241–256

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mayen P, Métral J-F, Tourmen C (2010) Les référentiels en formation: enjeux, légitimité, contenu et usage. Recherche et formation 64:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vinck D (2009) De l’objet intermédiaire à l’objet-frontière. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances 3(1):51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayen P (2015) Vocational didactics: work, learning, and conceptualization. In: Filliettaz L, Billett S (eds) Francophone perspectives of learning through work. Springer, Cham, pp 201–219

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Vidal-Gomel C (2016) Formation en situation de travail et troubles psychosociaux. Travail Apprentissage 18:25–47

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mollo V, Nascimento A (2014) Reflexive practices and the development of individuals, collectives and organizations. In: Falzon P (ed) Constructive ergonomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 205–220

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Bellghem L, De Gasparo S, Gaillard I (2014) The development of the psychosocial dimension of work. In: Falzon P (ed) Constructive ergonomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 33–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Gollac M, Bodier M (eds) (2011) Mesurer les facteurs psychosociaux de risque au travail pour les maîtriser. DARES, Ministère du travail et de l’emploi, Paris. http://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_SRPST_definitif_rectifie_11_05_10.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2018

  24. Curie J (2002) Parcours professionnels et interdépendances des domaines de vie. Education Permanente 150:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  25. Almudever B, Le Blanc A, Hajjar V (2013) Construction du sens du travail et processus de personnalisation: l’étude du transfert d’acquis d’expériences et des dynamiques de projet. In: Baubion-Broye A, Dupuy R, Prêteur Y (eds) Penser la socialisation en psychologie. Erès, Toulouse, pp 171–185

    Google Scholar 

  26. Curie J, Hajjar V (1987) Vie de travail, vie hors travail: la vie en temps partagé. In: Lévy-Leboyer C, Spérandio J-C (eds) Traité de psychologie du travail. PUF, Paris, pp 37–55

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cau-Bareille D (2016) Se reconvertir au gré des réformes de l’Enseignement Agricole: quels enjeux… pour quelles actions syndicales? Rapport de recherche du laboratoire de recherches Education Cultures et Politique, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mayen P (2012) Les situations professionnelles: un point de vue de didactique professionnelle. Phronesis 1(1):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Delgoulet C, Vidal-Gomel C (2014) The développement of skills: a condition for the construction of health and performance at work. In: Falzon P (ed) Constructive ergonomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Vidal-Gomel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vidal-Gomel, C., Boccara, V., Cau-Bareille, D., Delgoulet, C. (2019). How Holistic Approaches of Activity Analysis in Ergonomics Renew Training Design?. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 821. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96080-7_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics