Skip to main content

Use of a H∞ Controller on a Half Semi-trailer Truck Model to Reduce Vibrations and Its Implications on Human Factor

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2521 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 823))

Abstract

Comfort of a large goods vehicle driver has a crucial factor on fatigue one of which being physical (muscular) fatigue, which has common indicators of pain in the back and legs caused by prolonged voluntary and involuntary muscle activities as an attempt by the body to counteract the vibrations induced via the seat. Therefore, drivers working under uncomfortable driving conditions, encounter ergonomic problems, increased fatigue and require additional rest time. Consequently, these rests increase both in time and numbers resulting with lost logistics time and reduced efficiency. Additionally, these drivers suffer from medical issues both physically and mentally. It is shown that muscular health complaints is mostly accompanied by mental health complaints (e.g.: stress, burnout etc.). These muscular and mental health complaints increase drivers need for recovery, however drivers undergo problems to recover from this work-related fatigue at the end of work day. Though it may be seen as an acute issue, in long term, the accumulation of restlessness may induce the development of psychosomatic health problems. Hence, drop in medical status and efficiency of drivers burden the organizations with major financial costs, via sickness absence of worker, compensations of absenteeism, errors or mistakes occurred at work caused by sudden pain, stress, and etc. Therefore an uncomfortable driving experience becomes not only a health issue for the drivers but also an economical inconvenience to the company. To increase comfort and prevent these issues a H∞ controller with a dynamic output feedback was proposed in this study. This controller was designed and modeled with linear matrix inequality (LMI) method, and implemented on a model of a half semi-trailer truck augmented with a human-seat couple model. Both uncontrolled and controlled cases were simulated and compared in terms of the comfort level of the driver with respect to ISO 2631 standard. As a result, controller decreased the root mean square (RMS) acceleration on the human-seat couple and increased the comfort. Originating from these results, a discussion was made in the perspective of human factor such that, reducing the vibration is not only meant to increasing comfort of driver, but also eliminating the negative effects of discomfort on safe driving and reducing fatigue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wages, 53-3032 Heavy and Tractor-Trailer Truck Drivers. http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes533032.htm. 12 Apr 2018

  2. Kyung G, Nussbaum MA, Reeves KB (2008) Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part I): use of subjective ratings in discriminating car seats and correspondence among ratings. Int J Ind Ergon 38(5–6):516–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kyung G, Nussbaum MA, Reeves KB (2008) Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): relationships with and prediction from interface pressure. Int J Ind Ergon 38(5–6):526–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tiemessen IJ, Hulsholf CTJ, Frings-Dresen MHW (2007) An overview of strategies to reduce whole-body vibration exposure on drivers: a systematic review. Int J Ind Ergon 37(3):245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coyte JL, Stirling D, Du H, Ros M (2015) Seated whole-body vibration analysis, technologies, and modeling: a survey. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 46(6):725–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blood RP, Rynell PW, Johnson PW (2012) Whole-body vibration in heavy equipment operators of a front-end loader: role of task exposure and tire configuration with and without traction chains. J Saf Res 43(5–6):357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thamsuwan O, Blood RP, Ching RP, Boyle L, Johnson PW (2013) Whole body vibration exposures in bus drivers: a comparison between a high-floor coach and a low-floor city bus. Int J Ind Ergon 43(1):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahan AO, Arisoy DO, Muderrisoglu K, Yazici H, Guclu R (2016) Vibration control of a semi-trailer truck for comfort with an output feedback H∞ controller. In: II. International conference on engineering and natural sciences (ICENS), Sarajevo, pp 2053–2061

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guclu R (2004) The fuzzy-logic control of active suspensions without suspension-gap degeneration. J Mech Eng Strojniski Vestnik 50(10):462–468

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guclu R, Gulez K (2008) Neural network control of seat vibrations of a non-linear full vehicle model using PMSM. Math Comput Model 47(11–12):1356–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li H, Jing X, Karimi HR (2014) Output-feedback-based H∞ control for vehicle suspension systems with control delay. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(1):436–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun W, Zhao J, Li Y, Gao H (2011) Vibration control for active seat suspension systems via dynamic output feedback with limited frequency characteristic. Mechatronics 21(1):250–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao Y, Sun W, Gao H (2010) Robust control synthesis for seat suspension systems with actuator saturation and time-varying input delay. J Sound Vib 329(21):4335–4353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ljungberg JK, Parmentier FBR (2010) Psychological effects of combined noise and whole-body vibration: a review and avenues for future research. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng 224(10):1289–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marras WS (2001) Spine biomechanics, government regulation, and prevention of occupational low back pain. Spine J 1(3):163–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tamrin SBM, Yokoyama K, Jalaludin J, Aziz NA, Jemoin N, Nordin R, Abdullah M (2007) The association between risk factors and low back pain among commercial vehicle drivers in peninsular Malaysia: a preliminary result. Ind Health 45(2):268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Robb MJ, Mansfield NJ (2007) Self-reported musculoskeletal problems amongst professional truck drivers. Ergonomics 50(6):814–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boggs C, Ahmadian M (2007) Field study to evaluate driver fatigue on air-inflated truck seat cushions. Int J Heavy Veh Syst 14(3):227–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Asleep at the Wheel: The prevalence and impact of drowsy driving, american automobile association foundation for traffic safety. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/12723-drowsy_driving_asleep_at_the_wheel_031917_v4b_tag.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2018

  20. Ting P, Hwang J, Doong J, Jeng M (2008) Driver fatigue and highway driving: a simulator study. Physiol Behav 94(3):448–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sommer HC, Harris CS (1973) Combined effects of noise and vibration on human tracking performance and response time (No. AMRL-TR-72-83), Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Lab Wright-Patterson AFB OH

    Google Scholar 

  22. de Croon EM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH (2003) Need for recovery after work predicts sickness absence: a 2-year prospective cohort study in truck drivers. J Psychosom Res 55(4):331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kresal F, Roblek V, Jerman A, Meško M (2015) Lower back pain and absenteeism among professional public transport drivers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 21(2):166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 2631-1 (1997) Mechanical vibration and shock - evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. Part 1: general requirements

    Google Scholar 

  25. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 2631-5 (2004) Mechanical vibration and shock - evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. Part 5: method for evaluation of vibration containing multiple shocks

    Google Scholar 

  26. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 8608 (2016) Mechanical vibration - road surface profiles - reporting of measured data

    Google Scholar 

  27. Orvnas A (2011) On active secondary suspension in rail vehicles to improve ride comfort, KTH School of Engineering Science, PhD thesis, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ljungberg JK, Neely G (2007) Stress, subjective experience and cognitive performance during exposure to noise and vibration. J Environ Psychol 27(1):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dogan Onur Arisoy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oguzhan Ahan, A., Arisoy, D.O., Muderrisoglu, K., Arslan, B., Guclu, R. (2019). Use of a H∞ Controller on a Half Semi-trailer Truck Model to Reduce Vibrations and Its Implications on Human Factor. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 823. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics