Skip to main content

A Review of Driver State Monitoring Systems in the Context of Automated Driving

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 823))

Abstract

Conditionally automated driving (CAD) will lead to a paradigm shift in the field of driver state monitoring systems. High underload and the possibility of engaging in non-driving related activities will greatly influence the driver state. Level 3 also requires drivers to act as a fallback level in a take-over situation. Drivers have to get back in the loop and regain control with possible challenges due to their state. Therefore, driver state assessment will gain importance in order to ensure a safe and comfortable hand-over. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of driver state models and monitoring systems in the context of automated driving. Based on three driver state models, we focus on the commonly used driver state constructs fatigue, attention and workload. As part of this review, different definitions are summarized and possible metrics to operationalize these constructs were identified and critically reviewed. When reviewing the literature, it became apparent that driver state and the different constructs lack a common definition. Overall, eye-tracking is the technology with the most potential, but it needs further development to increase reliability. EEG lacks practicability and subjective measures are prone to misjudgement and may counteract extreme levels of fatigue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. SAE International (2016) Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE Standard J 3016_201609

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gold CG (2016) Modeling of Take-Over Performance in Highly Automated Vehicle Guidance. Dissertation, Technische Universität München. http://mediatum.ub.tum.de?id=1296132

  3. Bhatt PP, Trivedi JA (2017) Various methods for driver drowsiness detection: an overview. Int J Comput Sci Eng (IJCSE) 9(03):70–74

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heikoop DD, de Winter JCF, van Arem B, Stanton NA (2015) Psychological constructs in driving automation. A consensus model and critical comment on construct proliferation. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2015.1101507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanton N, Young M (2000) A proposed psychological model of driving automation. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220052399131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rauch N, Kaussner A, Boverie S, Giralt A (2009) HAVEit Deliverable D32.1 Report on driver assessment methodology. HAVEit - Highly automated vehicles for intelligent transport, Regensburg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marberger C, Mielenz H, Naujoks F, Radlmayr J, Bengler K, Wandtner B (2018) Understanding and applying the concept of “Driver Availability” in automated driving. In: Stanton NA (ed) Advances in human aspects of transportation: proceedings of the AHFE 2017 international conference on human factors in transportation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 595–605

    Google Scholar 

  8. Croo HD, Bandmann M, Mackay GM, Rumar K, Vollenhoven P (2001) The role of driver fatigue in commercial road transport crashes. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karrer-Gauß K (2012) Prospektive Bewertung von Systemen zur Müdigkeitserkennung - Ableitung von Gestaltungsempfehlungen zur Vermeidung von Risikokompensation aus empirischen Untersuchungen. Technische Universität Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. May JF, Baldwin CL (2009) Driver fatigue. The importance of identifying causal factors of fatigue when considering detection and countermeasure technologies. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Åkerstedt T, Gillberg M (2009) Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int J Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459008994241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoddes E, Zarcone V, Smythe H, Phillips R, Dement WC (1973) Quantification of sleepiness. A new approach. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1973.tb00801.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goncalves J, Happee R, Bengler K (2016) Drowsiness in conditional automation. Proneness, diagnosis and driving performance effects. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 19th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 873–878

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jarosch O, Kuhnt M, Paradies S, Bengler K (2017) It’s out of our hands now! effects of non-driving related tasks during highly automated driving on drivers’ fatigue. In: Proceedings of the 9th international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle design: driving assessment 2017. Driving assessment conference, Manchester Village, Vermont, USA. University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 26–29 June 2017, pp 319–325. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1653

  15. Knipling RR, Wierwille WW (1994) Vehicle-based drowsy driver detection. Current status and future prospects. In: IVHS America fourth annual meeting, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feldhütter A, Feierle A, Kalb L, Bengler K (2018) A new approach for a real-time non-invasive fatigue assessment system for automated driving. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society (HFES) (in Press)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dong Y, Hu Z, Uchimura K, Murayama N (2011) Driver inattention monitoring system for intelligent vehicles. A review. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2010.2092770

  18. Coetzer RC, Hancke GP (2009) Driver fatigue detection. A survey. In: Proceedings of the AFRICON, AFRICON 2009, Nairobi, Kenya. IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/afrcon.2009.5308101

  19. Vicente J, Laguna P, Bartra A, Bailón R (2016) Drowsiness detection using heart rate variability. Med Biol Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1448-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hargutt V (2000) Eyelid movements and their predictive value of fatigue stages. In: 3rd international conference of psychophysiology in ergonomics, San Diego, California, 30.07.2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wierwille WW, Wreggit SS, Kirn CL, La Ellsworth, Fairbanks, R.J (1994) Research on vehicle-based driver status/performance monitoring; development, validation, and refinement of algorithms for detection of driver drowsiness. Final report. U.S. Department of Transportation. Springfield, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  22. Murata A, Koriyama T, Hayami T (2012) A basic study on the prevention of drowsy driving using the change of neck bending and the sitting pressure distribution. In: Proceedings of SICE (Society of Instrument and Control Engineers) Annual Conference 2012, Akita, pp 274–279

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt J. Braunagel C, Stolzmann W, Karrer-Gauss K (2016) Driver drowsiness and behavior detection in prolonged conditionally automated drives. In: 2016 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), Gotenburg, Sweden. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 19–22 June 2016, pp 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1109/ivs.2016.7535417

  24. Regan MA, Hallett C, Gordon CP (2011) Driver distraction and driver inattention. Definition, relationship and taxonomy. Accident; analysis and prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.008

  25. Schooler JW, Smallwood J, Christoff K, Handy TC, Reichle ED, Sayette MA (2011) Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends Cogn Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oken BS, Salinsky MC, Elsas SM (2006) Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention. physiological basis and measurement. Clin Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt EA, Schrauf M, Simon M, Fritzsche M, Buchner A, Kincses WE (2009) Drivers’ mis-judgement of vigilance state during prolonged monotonous daytime driving. Accid Anal Prev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sathyanarayana A, Nageswaren S, Ghasemzadeh H, Jafari R, Hansen JHL (2008) Body sensor networks for driver distraction identification. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE international conference on vehicular electronics and safety (ICVES 2008), Columbus, OH, 22.09.2008–24.09.2008, Columbus, USA, pp 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1109/icves.2008.4640876

  29. Azman A, Meng Q, Edirisinghe E (2010) Non intrusive physiological measurement for driver cognitive distraction detection. Eye and Mouth Movements. In: 2010 3rd international conference on advanced computer theory and engineering (ICACTE). IEEE, pp 595–599 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Körber M, Cingel A, Zimmermann M, Bengler K (2015) Vigilance decrement and passive fatigue caused by monotony in automated driving. Procedia Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Young K, Regan M (2007) Driver distraction. A review of the literature. In: Faulks IJ, Regan M, Stevenson M, Brown J, Porter A, Irwin JD (ed) Distracted driving, NSW, Sydney, pp 379–405 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Selye H (1980) Selye’s guide to stress research. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Conti-Kufner A-S (2017) Measuring cognitive task load: an evaluation of the Detection Response Task and its implications for driver distraction assessment. Dissertation, Technische Universität München. http://mediatum.ub.tum.de?id=1340561

  34. Wickens CD (2008) multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Factors. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index). Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Meshkati N, Hancock PA (eds) Human Mental Workload. Advances in Psychology, vol 52, 1st edn. Elsevier textbooks, s.l., pp 139–183 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pauzié A (2008) A method to assess the driver mental workload. The driving activity load index (DALI). IET Intell Transp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its:20080023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kahneman D, Tursky B, Shapiro D, Crider A (1969) Pupillary, heart rate, and skin resistance changes during a mental task. J Exp Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Itoh M (2009) Individual differences in effects of secondary cognitive activity during driving on temperature at the nose tip. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on mechatronics and automation (ICMA), Changchun, China, 09.08.2009–12.08.2009, IEEE, Changchun, China, pp 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/icma.2009.5246188

  39. Marquart G, Cabrall C, de Winter J (2015) Review of eye-related measures of drivers’ mental workload. Procedia Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang Y, Reimer B, Dobres J, Mehler B (2014) The sensitivity of different methodologies for characterizing drivers’ gaze concentration under increased cognitive demand. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Healey JA, Picard RW (2005) Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2005.848368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yamakoshi T, Yamakoshi K, Tanaka S, Nogawa M, Shibata M, Sawada Y, Rolfe P, Hirose Y (2007) A preliminary study on driver’s stress index using a new method based on differential skin temperature measurement. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, vol. 2007, Lyon, France, pp 722–725

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lee HB, Choi JM, Kim JS, Kim YS, Baek HJ, Ryu MS, Sohn RH, Park KS (2007) Nonintrusive biosignal measurement system in a vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, Lyon, France, pp 2303–2306

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jeong IC, Jun Sh, Lee DH, Yoon HR (2007) Development of bio signal measurement system for vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on convergence, pp 1091–1096

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schmidt EA, Schrauf M, Simon M, Buchner A, Kincses WE (2011) The short-term effect of verbally assessing drivers’ state on vigilance indices during monotonous daytime driving. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lenné MG, Jacobs EE (2016) Predicting drowsiness-related driving events. a review of recent research methods and future opportunities. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2016.1155239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Heuer S, Chamadiya B, Gharbi A, Kunze C, Wagner M (2010) Unobtrusive in-vehicle biosignal instrumentation for advanced driver assistance and active safety. In: Proceedings of the IEEE EMBS conference on biomedical engineering and sciences (IECBES), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/iecbes.2010.5742238

  48. Bergasa LM, Nuevo J, Sotelo MA, Barea R, Lopez ME (2006) Real-Time system for monitoring driver vigilance. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2006.869598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Danisman T, Bilasco IM, Djeraba C, Ihaddadene N (2010) Drowsy driver detection system using eye blink patterns. In: 2010 international conference on machine and web intelligence (ICMWI), Algiers, 03.10.2010–05.10.2010. IEEE, pp 230–233. https://doi.org/10.1109/icmwi.2010.5648121

  50. Friedrichs, F., Yang, B.: Camera-based drowsiness reference for driver state classification under real driving conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), La Jolla, CA, USA, 21.06.2010–24.06.2010. IEEE, La Jolla, USA, pp 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/ivs.2010.5548039

  51. Fors C, Ahlström C, Sörner P, Kovaceva J, Hasselberg E, Krantz M, Grönvall J-F, Kircher K, Anund A (2011) Camera-based sleepiness detection. Final report of the project SleepEYE. ViP publication: ViP - Virtual Prototyping and Assessment by Simulation. Statens vägoch transport-forskningsinstitut, Linköping

    Google Scholar 

  52. ISO/TS 15007-2:2014 (2014) Road vehicles - Measurement of driver visual behaviour with respect to transport information and control systems: Part 2: Equipment and procedures. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Hecht .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hecht, T. et al. (2019). A Review of Driver State Monitoring Systems in the Context of Automated Driving. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 823. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics