Skip to main content

In the Right Place at the Right Time? A View at Latency and Its Implications for Automotive Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 823))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the presented study, latency between physical event and displayed content is considered in order to provide a quantifiable criterion. In a driving simulator the influence of a contact-analog lane marker which was subjected to different stages of latency (17 ms, 50 ms, 100 ms) is examined. In total 43 participants took part in this experiment. A detection response task was conducted to evaluate the subjects’ reaction times and cognitive workload [1]. Usability was assessed by applying the system usability scale [2]. Changes in latency have a significant influence on stress and usability. Specifically latencies over 50 ms have a negative effect on the dependent variables. Results suggest that latencies of up to 50 ms are still considered acceptable in terms of usability as evaluated in the implemented use case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bubb H, Bengler K, Grünen R, Vollrath M (2015) “Automobilergonomie” (ATZ/MTZ-Fachbuch). Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?di-rect=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=959251

  2. Brooke J (1996) SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Ind 189:194

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bengler K, Dietmayer K, Farber B, Maurer M, Stiller C, Winner H (2014) Three decades of driver assistance systems: review and future perspectives. IEEE Intell Transport Syst Mag 6:6–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gish KW, Staplin L (1995) Human factors aspects of using head up displays in automobiles: a review of the literature. Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kiefer RJ (1998) Defining the “HUD benefit time window”. Vision in vehicles - VI. Derby, England, North Holland, Amsterdam, New York, pp 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kiefer RJ (1999) Older drivers’ pedestrian detection times surrounding head-up versus head-down speedometer glances. Vision in vehicles - VII, Marseille, France. Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York, pp 111–118

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horrey WJ, Wickens CD, Alexander AL (2003) The effects of head-up display clutter and in-vehicle display separation on concurrent driving performance. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet 47:1880–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Azuma RT (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence-Teleop Virt. 6:355–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeh M, Wickens CD (2001) Display signaling in augmented reality: effects of cue reliability and image realism on attention allocation and trust calibration. Hum Factors 43:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rusch ML, Schall MC, Gavin P, Lee JD, Dawson JD, Vecera S, Rizzo M (2013) Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 16:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfannmüller L, Walter M, Bengler K. (2015) Lead me the right way?! The impact of position accuracy of augmented reality navigation arrows in a contact analogue head-up display on driving performance, workload, and usability. In: Proceedings 19th triennial congress of the IEA, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  12. Engström J, Johansson E, Östlund J (2005) Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 8(2):97–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pfannmüller L (2017) “Anzeigekonzepte für ein kontaktanaloges Head-up Display”, Dissertation, Technische Universität München

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Mr. Tobias Schumm and Mr. Johannes Salzberger from Audi AG for their continuing support and expertise during this experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Walter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Walter, M., Wendisch, T., Bengler, K. (2019). In the Right Place at the Right Time? A View at Latency and Its Implications for Automotive Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 823. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics