Skip to main content

Enhancing the Usability of a Mobile App for Process Evaluation in a Participatory Ergonomics Healthcare Intervention

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 824))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Monitoring of workplace intervention processes in real-time can identify factors influencing intervention success or failure while they can still be modified if necessary. The aims of this study are to describe a process to assess and (where necessary) improve functionality and usability of a process evaluation mobile app. The app was developed for the research study “Safety and Health through Integrated, Facilitated Teams” (SHIFT), an evaluation of the CPH-NEW Healthy Workplace Participatory Program in public sector healthcare institutions. App users are members and co-facilitators of labor-management health and safety committees, internal program champions, other managers, and researchers. The app records four “functions:” meetings held, attendance and attendee feedback; project-related chats; and time spent on project activities. Post-meeting feedback surveys cover participant engagement, group dynamics, and usefulness of the intervention at each step. Pilot tests were conducted across combinations of device specifications to assess both functionality and usability. Functionality problems were fixed as they were documented. The average System Usability Scale scores for seven student testers were similar between the two interfaces: 72.9 for the mobile app and 72.5 for the website, both corresponding to “good” usability. Development of a mobile app requires substantial effort and personnel time which may not be apparent at the start of the project. Communication between researchers and the app developer was challenging at times. Conceptual and mental models of the specifications do not necessarily correspond due to differences in fields, experience, and priorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brooke J (1996) SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. Usability Eval Ind 189–194:4–7

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nielsen J (1995) Usability heuristics for user interface design. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/. Accessed 7 May 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Grant Number U19-OH008857, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH/CDC). The research team thanks the students and end-user volunteers who tested the mobile application and website.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winnie Chin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chin, W., Kurowski, A., Chen, G., Gore, R., Punnett, L. (2019). Enhancing the Usability of a Mobile App for Process Evaluation in a Participatory Ergonomics Healthcare Intervention. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_56

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics