Skip to main content

Ergonomics Evaluation of Workstations for Mechanical Engineering Companies with Particular Attention to Older Workers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 824))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Raising the retirement age characterizes the Italian pension policies as long as many other Western countries. The problems associated with the rise of the working-age population occur at the level of the production sector and at the level of the over 50 age workers safety and health risks, who work in the handling and control of industrial machineries. (ILO, 2015)

The sector of mechanical engineering is part of the metal industry, and it deals with machineries and facilities production. Today many people work into the metal industry, especially the over 50 workers.

By identifying the over 50 workers as a specific category of users, the design needs require the adaptation of the workstation to prevent any risks related to safety and to incapacity to work. The purpose of this ergonomics evaluation is the raising of safety and usability standard conditions.

This is the case of OCEM 2 company. It is made up of workers aged between 22 and 54.

The project in question aims to an ergonomic evaluation of 6 workstations in the carpentry and assembly departments.

The purpose of research project is to improve current workstations through an euristic evaluation of users risks conditions, using the methodological approach of ergonomics for design and its theoretical and operational tools, as Task Analysis, Users observation, Thinking Aloud, questionnaires and interviews. The aim of the results is to provide the basis for developing the design phase and to improve users risk conditions, usability and users comfort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Labour Office (2015) World employment and social outlook, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (2012) Promoting active ageing in the workplace, Bilbao

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 9241-210:2010 (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction, part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems

    Google Scholar 

  4. UNI 11377-1:2010 (2010) Usabilità dei prodotti industriali, parte 1: principi generali, termini e definizioni

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abras C, Maloney-Krichmar D, Preece J, (2004) User-centered design. In Bainbridge W (ed) Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norman DA (2013) The design of everyday things. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rubin J, Chisnell D (2011) Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design, and conduct effective test, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pheasant S, Haslegrave CM (2015) Bodyspace: anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (2002) Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tosi F (2005) Ergonomia progetto prodotto. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jordan PW (1998) An introduction to usability. Taylor & Francis, Londra

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson JR (1995) A framework and a contest for ergonomics methodology. In: Wilson JR, Corlett EN (eds) Evaluation of human work. Taylor & Francis, Londra-Philadelphia


    Google Scholar 

  13. Stanton N, Baber C (1996) Factors effecting the selection of methods and techniques prior to conducting a usability evaluation. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland I (eds) Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor & Francis, Londra-Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stanton NA, Young MS, Harvey C (2014) Guide to methodology in ergonomics, designing for human use, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. UNI 11377-2:2010 (2010) Usabilità dei prodotti industriali, parte 2: metodi e strumenti di intervento

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tosi F, Rinaldi A, Busciantella Ricci D, Pistolesi M, Brischetto A (2016) Ergonomics evaluation and redesign of workstation to prototyping of luxury garments. In: XI Congresso nazionale SIE 2016, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  17. Inail, Stress termico. https://www.inail.it/cs/internet/attivita/prevenzione-e-sicurezza/conoscere-il-rischio/agenti-fisici/stress-termico.html. Accessed 21 Dec 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Francesca Tosi or Mattia Pistolesi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tosi, F., Pistolesi, M. (2019). Ergonomics Evaluation of Workstations for Mechanical Engineering Companies with Particular Attention to Older Workers. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics