Skip to main content

Proposal of a Guide to Select Methods of Ergonomic Assessment in the Manufacturing Industry in México

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 825))

Abstract

This paper presents the particular situation on the manufacturing industry in Mexico, a sector of the economy that provides important figures for the economy and that generates an important number of jobs, and the relevance of ergonomics in the health care of workers, in particular the Work Muscle Skeletal Disorders (WMSD). In recent years there has been an increase in the number these cases. In addition, the new legal regulations that require companies to identify and evaluate Ergonomics Risk Factors (ERF) have taken effect and it is needed take actions to minimize the risk of exposure to a WMSD. The paper presents a review of the ERF and the WMSD described in the literature as well as the proposal of a methodological guide to select the Ergonomic Assessment Methods (EAM) with greater application for the manufacturing industry, distinguishing two main activities; repetitive work and manual handling of loads. For each of these, the EAMs with the simplest application in two levels are suggested; the recommended EAM and at a second level the alternative EAMs to complement the evaluation. The guide is presented graphically and a brief description of each method and its scientific reference is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Instituto Nacional de Geografía, Informática y Estadística (INEGI) (2017) Estadísticas a propósito de la Industria Automotriz. http://www.amia.com.mx. Accessed 22 Oct 2017

  2. Asociación Mexicana de la Industria Automotriz (AMIA). http://www.amia.com.mx. Accessed 26 Nov 2017

  3. The International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA) (2017). http://www.oica.net. Accessed 26 Nov 2017

  4. Promexico (2017) Diagnostico sectorial, industria electrónica. http://www.promexico.gob.mx/documentos/diagnosticos-ectoriales/electronico.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2018

  5. Maestas N, Powell D, Wenger J (2017) Working conditions in the United States, Results of the 2015 American Working Conditions Survey. RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/t/RR2014. Accessed 08 Feb 2018

  6. Pinila GJ, Almodovar MA, Galiana BM, Hervas RP, Zimmerman VM (2015) Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Trabajo. 2015 6ª EWCS – España. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo (INSHT). http://www.insht.es. Accessed 12 Feb 2018

  7. Parent-Thirion A, Biletta I, Cabrita J, Vargas O, Vermeylen G, Wilczynska A, Wilkwns M (2017) Eurofound, sixth european working conditions survey – overview report (2017 update). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Labor Organization, The prevention of occupational diseases. http://www.ilo.org/publns. Accessed 13 Nov 2017

  9. Health and Safety Executive, Health and safety statistics, http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/index.htm. Accessed 19 Nov 2017

  10. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) (2016) Memoria estadística. http://www.imss.gob.mx/conoce-al-imss/memoria-estadistica-2016. Accessed 05 Nov 2017

  11. Simoneau S, ST-Vincent M, Chicoine D. Les LATR- Mieux les comprendre pour mieux les prévenir.Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail. http://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/PubIRSST/RG-779.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2017

  12. The Eastman Kodak Company (2004) Ergonomic design for people at work, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bernard B (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors; a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Health Council of the Netherlands. Repetitive movements at work: Risk to health. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands. Publication no. 2013/05E. Health Council of the Netherlands. http://www.healthcouncil.nl. Accessed 11 Dec 2017

  15. Colombini D, Occhipinti E, Alvarez-Casado E, Waters T (2013) MANUAL LIFTING: a guide to study of simple and complex lifting tasks. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stanton NA, Hedge A, Brookhuis K, Salas E, Hendrick HW (2006) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marras WS, Karwowski W (2006) Fundamentals and assessment tools. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  18. Malchaire J, Cock N, Vergratch S (2011) Review of factors associated with musculoskeletal problems in epidemiologic studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stack T, Ostrom LT, Wilhelmsen CA (2016) Occupational ergonomics: a practical approach. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  20. David GC (2005) Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med 55:190–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garg A, Kapellush JM. Job analysis techniques for distal upper extremity disorders. Rev Hum Factors Ergon. http://rev.sagepub.com/content/7/1/149. Accessed 14 Dec 2017

  22. Health and Safety Executive. Assessment of repetitive tasks (ART Tool). http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg438.htm. Accessed 05 Oct 2017

  23. McAtamney L, Corlet EN (1973) RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 24(2):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hignett S, McAtamney I (2000) Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon 31:201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Health and Safety Executive. Manual handling assessment charts (MAC Tool). http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg383.htm. Accessed 08 Oct 2017

  26. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A. NIOSH Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/94-110/pdfs/94-110.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017

  27. Liberty Mutual Tables. Manual material handling tables. https://libertymmhtables.libertymutual.com/CM_LMTablesWeb. Accessed 10 Dec 2017

  28. Health and Safety Executive. Rapid assessment for pushing and pulling (RAPP Tool). http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg478.htm. Accessed 11 Dec 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to López Millán Francisco Octavio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Francisco Octavio, L.M., Enrique Javier, D.B., Vidal, A.T.O., Gerardo, M.P. (2019). Proposal of a Guide to Select Methods of Ergonomic Assessment in the Manufacturing Industry in México. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 825. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96068-5_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics