Advertisement

When Being a Woman Represents a Major Risk of Commuting Accidents?

  • Silvana SalernoEmail author
  • Claudia Giliberti
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 826)

Abstract

Since 2010, National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL) recognized commuting accidents as work injury. Commuting is the leading cause of death among Italian and immigrant women. Commuting disabilities have been studied from INAIL records within the last five years (2012–2016). Results show how women present more disabilities in commuting than men (53.2% vs 46.8% men, p < 0,001). Men show more disabilities due to commuting with vehicle (39.8% vs 36.8% women) while commuting without vehicle is more frequent among women (16.4% vs 7% men, p < 0,05) with more permanent disabilities and severe ones (20.4% vs 9% men, p < 0.001; severe 16.5% vs 7.2% men, p < 0,001). Skeleton-motor apparatus is the most affected among women (87.7% vs 80.7% men, p < 0.001) in all work injury disabilities. Lower limbs are the women body site mainly injured (40.4% women vs 38.6% men, p < 0.01) after upper limbs.

More disabilities due to commuting, particularly without vehicle, can be explained with women more home-work-home walking together with double burden, low socio-economic status, work and environmental conditions.

Ergonomics should deal towards commuting gender-oriented prevention, in terms of home-work-home journey concept (sidewalks, lighting, etc), work organization (family/work balance, flexible working hours, limited night shift work, standing and sitting posture, dual tasks, etc.), specific women’s health prevention (osteoporosis, strengthening lower limbs, wearing suitable shoes for walking and working, etc.).

Keywords

Commuting Gender Disabilities 

References

  1. 1.
    European transport safety council. https://etsc.eu/etsc-announces-2017-work-related-road-safety-award-winners/. Accessed 28 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Camino Lopez MA, Gonzalez Alcantara OJ, Fontaneda I (2017) Gender differences in commuting injuries in Spain and their impact on injury prevention. Biomed Res Intl 2017:3834827Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giliberti C, Salerno S (2016) Gender differences and commuting accidents in Italy: INAIL Data Base analysis on fatalities (2009–2013). Med Lav 107(6):462–472Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2013) Schneider E. New risks and trends in the safety and health of women at work. https://osha.europa.eu/en/tools-and-publications/publications/reports/new-risks-and-trends-in-the-safety-and-health-of-women-at-work. Accessed 28 May 2018
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Rossi P (2013) Raggruppamento delle menomazioni ai fini di un classamento statistico. Rivista Italiana di Medicina Legale no 3Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Salerno S, Brusco A, Bucciarelli A, Giliberti C (2017) La prevention des morts pour accidents trajet des femmes en Italie: un defi pour l’ergonomie. 52ème Congrès de la Société d’Ergonomie de Langue Française SELF 2017 Toulouse, 20–22 Septembre 2017, pp 373–376Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bena A, Giraudo M (2017) The health of foreign workers: an Italian and international priority. Recenti Prog Med 108(7):303–306Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneider E. EU-OSHA (2015) Gender at work and varying forms of exposure. http://www.etui.org/Events/Women-s-health-and-work-Sharing-knowledge-and-experiences-to-enhance-women-s-working-conditions-and-gender-equality. Accessed 28 May 2018
  11. 11.
    Gennaro V1, Ghirga G, Corradi L (2012) In Italy, healthy life expectancy drop dramatically: from 2004 to 2008 there was a 10 years drop among newborn girls. Ital J Pediatr 38:19Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Inail D, Mochi S (2008) Lavoro e infortuni: le differenze di genere. https://www.inail.it/cs/internet/docs/ucm_071044.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018
  13. 13.
    Garcia MG, Graf M, Läubli T (2017) Lower limb pain among workers: a cross-sectional analysis of the fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 90(7):575–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blanchette MG, Brault JR, Powers CM (2011) The influence of heel height on utilized coefficient of friction during walking. Gait Posture 34(1):107–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lundgren K1, Kuklane K, Gao C, Holmér I (2013) Effects of heat stress on working populations when facing climate change. Ind Health 51(1):3–15Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hours M, Fort E, Charbotel B, Chiron M (2001) Jobs at risk fo work-related road crashes: an analysis of the causalities from the Rhone Road Trauma Registry (France). Saf Sci 49:1270–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morency P, Strauss J, Pépin F, Tessier F, Grondines J (2018) Traveling by bus instead of car on urban major roads: safety benefits for vehicle occupants, pedestrians, and cyclists. J Urban Health 95:196–207Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stevenson M, Thompson J, de Sá TH, Ewing R, Mohan D, McClure R, Roberts I, Tiwari G, Giles-Corti B, Sun X, Wallace M, Woodcock J (2016) Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities. Lancet 388(10062):2925–2935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hill JD, Boyle LN (2007) Driver stress as influenced by driving maneuvers and roadway conditions. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 10:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salerno S, Dimitri L, Livigni L, Magrini A, Talamanca IF (2015) Mental health in hospital. Analysis of conditions of risk by department, age and gender, for the creation of best practices for the health of nurses. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 37(1):46–55Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giliberti C, Figà Talamanca I, Salerno S (2014) Ergonomic design for young users of mobile phones. In: Rebelo F, Soares M (eds) Advances in ergonomics in design, usability & special populations part II. Applied human factors and ergonomics, AHFE conference 2014Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee JH, Lee MH (2018) The effects of smartphone multitasking on gait and dynamic balance. J Phys Ther Sci 30(2):293–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Costa G, Pickup L, Di MV (1988) Commuting-a further stress factor for working people: evidence from the European Community. I. A review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 60(5):371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Santamariña-Rubio E, Pérez K, Olabarria M, Novoa AM (2014) Gender differences in road traffic injury rate using time travelled as a measure of exposure. Accid Anal Prev 65:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ENEA - National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic DevelopmentRomeItaly
  2. 2.INAIL-DIT - National Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at WorkRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations