Skip to main content

How Age and Pace of Work Affect Movement Variability During Repetitive Assembly Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 826))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

During production, companies aim to ensure optimal productivity and quality. With this in mind, workstation designers tend to assume that operators will perform tasks in a uniform manner, and tend not to include movement variability parameters in their designs. The aim of this study was to characterise movement variability during repetitive assembly tasks performed at a defined pace. 62 right-handed men in three different age groups were asked to affix a handle on a base with two nuts at two different paces. Particular attention was paid to how two factors influenced movement variability: the operator’s and the pace of work. Variability was observed in assembly way of doing when the procedure was not imposed. The variability observed during assembly, as performed for this study, was unaffected by operators’ age or the pace of work. No effect of variability was observed on the duration of assembly cycles, nor on the adaptation to changes in pace. In contrast, variability allowed operators alternatives to repetitive movement which could potentially exert strain on the locomotor system. Allowing operators the possibility to spontaneously use variable movements during repetitive tasks appears to be an important element to consider when designing workstations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berthoz A (1997) Le sens du mouvement. Odile Jacob (Eds), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glazier PS, Wheat JS, Pease DL, Bartlett R (2006) Dynamic system theory and the functional role of movement variability. In: Davids K, Bennett S, Newell K (eds) Movement system variability. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign (IL), pp 49–72

    Google Scholar 

  3. Diniz A, Wijnants ML, Torre K, Barreiros J, Crato N, Bosman AM, Hasselman F, Cox RF, Van Orden GC, Delignières D (2011) Contemporary theories of 1/f noise in motor control. Hum Mov Sci 30(5):889–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schröner G (2002) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30(1):26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson JA, Mathiassen SE, Dempsey PG (2009) Methodological variance associated with normalization of occupational upper trapezius EMG using sub-maximal reference contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 19(3):416–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Madeleine P, Lundager B, Voigt M, Arendt-Nielsen L (2003) The effects of neck-shoulder pain development on sensory-motor interactions among female workers in the poultry and fish industries. a prospective study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76(1):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  7. Madeleine P, Lundager B, Voigt M, Arendt-Nielsen L (2003) Standardized low-load repetitive work: evidence of different motor control strategies between experienced workers and a reference group. Appl Ergon 34(6):533–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathiassen SE, Burdorf A, Van der Beek AJ (2002) Statistical power and measurement allocation in ergonomic intervention studies assessing upper trapezius EMG amplitude. a case study of assembly work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12(1):45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathiassen SE, Möller T, Forsman M (2003) Variability in mechanical exposure within and between individuals performing a highly constrained industrial work task. Ergonomics 46(3):800–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Terrier P, Schutz Y (2003) Variability of gait patterns during unconstrained walking assessed by satellite positioning (GPS). Eur J Appl Physiol 90(5–6):554–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Svendsen JH, Madeleine P (2010) Amount and structure of force variability during short, ramp and sustained contractions in males and females. Hum Mov Sci 29(1):35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Madeleine P, Voigt M, Mathiassen SE (2008) The size of cycle-to-cycle variability in biomechanical exposure among butchers performing a standardised cutting task. Ergonomics 51(7):1078–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martine A. Gilles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gilles, M.A., Gaudez, C., Savin, J., Remy, A., Remy, O., Wild, P. (2019). How Age and Pace of Work Affect Movement Variability During Repetitive Assembly Tasks. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 826. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96065-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics