Advertisement

A Sustainable Working Life for All Ages – The swAge-Model

  • Kerstin NilssonEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 826)

Abstract

The demographic shift is fast becoming a global challenge and an important public health concern. The proportion of people over 65 years is currently 10% around the world, but it is expected to rise to 22% by the year 2050 [1]. Populations ageing rapidly is widely seen as one of the most powerful transformative forces affecting society over the next four decades [1, 2, 3, 4]. The ageing population is probably one of the most significant threats to global wealth because of the potential strains it imposes on the robustness of social welfare, public health, and economic prosperity. The challenges and opportunities posed by this demographic shift are therefore of special interest to sustainable societies and require the implementation of policies to help people stay healthy and active while ageing, but also to work longer providing the welfare systems.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    World Economic Forum (2016) Global Agenda Council on Ageing. https://www.weforum.org/communities/global-agenda-council-on-ageing/
  2. 2.
    Rechel B, Grundy E, Robine J-M et al (2013) Ageing in the European union. Lancet 181:1312–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    UNFPA & HelpAge International (2012) Ageing in the twenty-first century: a celebration and a challenge. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), New York & HelpAge International, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    OECD (2016) Health at a glance: Europe 2016. State of health in the EU Cycle. OECD Publishing, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265592-en
  5. 5.
    Kunze F, Raes AML, Bruch H (2015) It matter how old you feel: antecedents and consequences of age in organizations. J Appl Psychol 100(5):1511–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beehr TA, Glazer S, Nielson NL, Farmer SJ (2000) Work and nonwork predictors of employees’ retirement age. J Vocat Behav 57:206–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nilsson K (2016) Conceptualization of ageing in relation to factors of importance for extending working life – a review. Scandinavian J Publ Health 44:490–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nilsson K (2017) Bästföredatum på arbetskraften? – olika åldersbegrepps betydelse för äldre i arbetslivet [Best before date on the workforce? - Different age concepts important for older people in the workplace]. In: Krekula C, Johansson B (eds) Ålder, makt och organisering – teori och empiri. Studentlitteratur, Lund (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nilsson K (2013) To work or not to work in an extended working life? Factors in working and retirement decision. Lund University, Lund, 4Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nilsson K (2017) The ability and desire to extend working life. In: Vingård E (ed) Healthy workplaces for men and women in all ages. Swedish Work Environment Authority, Stockholm, pp 30–49Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nilsson K, Rignell-Hydbom A, Rylander L (2011) Factors influencing the decision to extend working life or to retire. Scandinavian J Work Environ Health 37(6):473–480Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nilsson K (2012) Why work beyond 65? discourse on the decision to continue working or retire early. Nord J Working Life Stud 2(3):7–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nilsson K (2005) Vem kan och vill arbeta till 65 år eller längre? En studie av anställda inom hälso- och sjukvården. [Who can and want to work until 65 years or beyond? A study with employed in health and medical care]. Arbete och hälsa, 14 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nilsson K (2006) Äldre medarbetares attityder till ett långt arbetsliv. Skillnader mellan olika yrkesgrupper inom hälso- och sjukvården. [Older workers attitude to an extended working life. Differences between occupations in health and medical care.] Arbetsliv i omvandling, 10. (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nilsson K (2003) Förlängt arbetsliv – En litteraturstudie av faktorer med betydelse för förlängt arbetsliv som alternativ till tidig pensionsavgång. [Extended working life – A literature review on factors important to an extended working life as an alternative to early retirement]. Swedish National Institute of Working life, Malmö (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nilsson K (2005) Pension eller arbetsliv? [Pension or working life?]. Swedish National Institute in Working life, Malmö (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caffaro F, Lundqvist P, Micheletti Cremasco M, Nilsson K, Pinzke S, Cavallo E (2018) Being a farmer at old age: an ergonomic analysis of work-related risks in a group of Swedish farmers aged 65 and over. J Agromedicine 23:78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hovbrandt C, Håkansson C, Karlsson G, Albin M, Nilsson K (2017) Prerequisites and driving forces behind an extended working life among older workers. Scandinavian J Occup Therapy 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1409800
  19. 19.
    Nilsson K (2017) The influence of work environmental and motivation factors on seniors’ attitudes to an extended working life or to retire. A cross sectional study with employees 55–74 years of age. Open J Soc Sci 5:30–41Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gyllensten K, Wentz K, Håkansson C, Nilsson K (2018) Older assistant nurses’ motivation for a full or extended working life. Ageing and SocietyGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nilsson K (2017) Hållbart arbetsliv inom hälso- och sjukvården – studie om hur 11 902 medarbetare upplever sin arbetssituation och möjlighet att arbeta i ett förlängt arbetsliv [Sustainable working life in health care – survey with 11 902 employees regarding their experience of their work situation and possibility to work in an extended working life]. Arbets- och miljömedicin, Lunds universitet: Rapport nr 13/2017Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nilsson K, Pinzke S, Lundqvist P (2010) Occupational injuries to senior farmers in Sweden. J Agric Saf Health 16(1):19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nilsson K (2015) Kön och ålderspension – en tvärsnittsstudie om skillnader mellan män och kvinnor i att kunna och vilja arbeta till 65 år eller längre. [Gender and age pension - a cross-sectional study about the differences between men and women to be able and willing to work to 65 years or longer] Occupational and Environmental medicine, Lund University: Report 4/2015 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nilsson K, Rignell-Hydbom A, Rylander L (2016) How is self-rated health and diagnosed disease associate with early or deferred retirement: a cross sectional study with employees aged 55–64. BMC Publ Health 16:886.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3438-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nilsson K (2003) Arbetstillfredsställelse hos äldre läkare och sjuksköterskor. [Work satisfaction among older physician and nurses]. Swedish National Institute of Working life, Malmö (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bengtsson E, Nilsson K (2004) Äldre medarbetare. [Older worker]. Swedish National Institute of Working life, Malmö (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nilsson K (2018) Managers’ attitudes to their older employees - a cross-sectional study. WORK J Prev Assess Rehabil 59(1):49–58Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nilsson E, Nilsson K (2017) The transfer of knowledge between younger and older employees in the health and medical care: an intervention study. Open J Soc Sci 5:71–96Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nilsson K (2017) Active and healthy ageing at work. - A qualitative study with employees 55–63 years and their managers. Open J Soc Sci 5:13–29Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hörnstedt K, Nilsson K, Albin M, Håkansson C (2017) Managers’ perceptions of older workers and an extended working life in Sweden. Int J Gerontol Geriatr Res 1:14–20Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nilsson K (2007) Chefers attityder till äldre medarbetare inom kommunen. [Municipal managers attitude to their older workers]. Swedish National Institute of Working life, Stockholm, 4Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nilsson E, Nilsson K (2017) Time for caring? elderly care employees’ occupational activities in the cross draft between their work priorities, “must-do’s” and meaningfulness. Int J Care Coord 20(1–2):8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nilsson K (2011) Attitudes of managers and older employees to each other and the effects on the decision to extended working life. In: Ennals R, Salomon RH (eds) Older workers in a sustainable society. Labor, education and society, pp 147–156. Peter Lang Verlag, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pinzke S, Nilsson K, Lundqvist P (2012) Tractor accidents in Swedish traffic. Work J Prev Assess Rehabil 41:5317–5323Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nilsson K (2017) Interventions to reduce injuries among older workers: a review of evaluated intervention projects. WORK J Prev Assess Rehabil 55(2):471–480Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nilsson K, Östergren P-O, Kadefors R, Albin M (2016) Has the participation of older employees in the workforce increased? Study of the total Swedish population regarding exit working life. Scandinavian J Publ Health 44:506–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kadefors R, Nilsson K, Rylander L, Östergren P-O, Albin M (2017) Occupation, gender and work-life exits: a Swedish population study. Ageing Soc 1–18Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fridriksson, JF, Tómasson K, Midtsundstad T, Sivesind Mehlum I, Hilsen AI, Nilsson K, Albin M, Poulsen OM (2017) Working environment and work retention. Nordiska ministerrådet TemaNord, Copenhagen, nr. 559:1–121Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations