Skip to main content

Digital Making as an Opportunity for Social Inclusion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 826))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2107 Accesses

Abstract

Within the framework of the EU-funded project ‘Digital Do-It-Yourself (DiDIY), we have explored the dynamics facilitating the acquisition of different competencies in this practice.

Rooted in design and construction, the digital making activities often emphasize the acquisition of problem-solving, critical thinking, creativity, cross-disciplinarily and collaboration.

Starting from the results of the Digital DIY project has come to light that the developed process can also facilitate inclusivity. The contemporary phenomenon of “digital making” linked to “make” enabled by digital technologies (e.g., Web 2.0, 3D printers) is a meaningful context for social inclusion through interpersonal productive activities.

In this paper, we will first define such competencies as a result of a comparative study of the literature analysis. The analysis of the current scenario of digital DIY as a social innovation phenomenon enabled us to define a model through which it was possible to identify the fundamental dynamics and factors for skilling. The same model can allow the replication and adaptation of such dynamics into a different environment, such as the social inclusion.

We will conclude with the proposal of transferring the skilling dynamics identified in digital DIY to promote social inclusion of elderly.

The DiDIY co-design model, developed during the EU projects, includes the development of tools that facilitate the involvement of people in the design process merging digital making and skills improvement. The social empowerment and the individual creativity and self-improvement skills are crucial elements to avoid social exclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such key competences have been widely defined and work programmes have been activated to promote their application among the educational and work fields both in Europe (i.e. the Lifelong Learning programme edited by the European Commission (2006/962/EC)) [6] and across United Stated (i.e. the Partnership for the 21st century skills, National Research Council) [7].

References

  1. European Project Digital Do It Yourself (DiDIY). http://www.didiy.eu/

  2. Bruno C, Salvia G, Canina M (2016) Digital self-production as a means to improve education. In: 10th international technology, education and development conference 2016, Valencia, pp 2304–2310

    Google Scholar 

  3. Salvia G, Bruno C, Canina M (2016) Skilling and learning through digital Do-It-Yourself: the role of (Co)Design. In: DRS2016: Design+ Research+ society-future-focused thinking. Design Research Society, Brighton, pp 2077–2089

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson P (2006) Do it yourself: democracy and design. J Des Hist 19(1):10

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson C (2012) Makers: the new industrial revolution. McClelland & Stewart, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Commission (2007) Key competences for lifelong learning. European Reference Framework0

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Partnership of 21st Century Skills (2008) 21st century skills, education & competitiveness. A resource and policy guide

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vossoughi S, Bevan B (2014) Making and tinkering: a review of the literature. In: National Research Council Committee on out of school time STEM, pp 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peppler K, Bender S (2013) Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan 95(3):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hielscher S, Smith A (2014) Community-based digital fabrication workshops: a review of the research literature (No. 08). SPRU Working Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ree R (2011) Master thesis: 3D printing: convergences, frictions, fluidity, University of Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  12. Naegele G, Schnabel E (2010) Measures for social inclusion of the elderly: the case of volunteering. Working paper. European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions, Ireland. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2010/quality-of-life-social-policies/measures-for-social-inclusion-of-the-elderly-the-case-of-volunteering-working-paper. Accessed 28 May 2018

  13. World Health Organization (2002) The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  14. United Nation (2002) Report of the second world assembly on ageing Madrid, New York, 8–12 April 2002. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CONF.197/9

  15. Kahana E, Kahana B, Kercher K (2003) Ageing Int 28:155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray R, Caulier-Grice J, Mulgan G (2010) The open book of social innovation. Nesta and Young Foundation, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Benkler Y, Nissenbaum H (2006) Commons-based peer production and virtue. J Polit Philos 14(4):394–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gauntlett D (2011) Making is connecting: the social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Polity Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Soderberg J (2013) Automating amateurs in the 3D printing community. Work Organ Labour Globalisation 7(1):124–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Olphert CW, Damodaran L, May AJ (2010) Towards digital inclusion-engaging older people in the ‘digital world’. In: Accessible design in the digital world conference 2005, Dundee, Scotland. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b312/dac0a90bbdfeffc8b4348a5793593fbc58a1.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018

  21. Hill R, Betts L, Gardner S (2015) Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput Hum Behav 48:415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanders E, Chan P (2007) Emerging trends in design research. In: IASDR07 - International Association of Societies of Design Research, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, School of Design, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  23. IDEActivity: Codesign in the Digital DIY scenario. Toolkit and guidelines (2017). http://www.ideactivity.polimi.it/toolkits/. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marita Canina or Carmen Bruno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Canina, M., Bruno, C. (2019). Digital Making as an Opportunity for Social Inclusion. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 826. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96065-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics