Advertisement

Building the (Higher)Education Stakeholder: The Realities of Economics in Higher Education

  • Geanina NaeEmail author
  • Virgil Nae
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Psychology of Education book series (CPED, volume 7)

Abstract

With the development of the human capital theory in the 1960s, education policy and its impact on societal advancement became an integral part of the economic policy. Under the assumptions that education leads to increased individual productivity, that earnings are a proxy for productivity (i.e., the more productive you are, the more you will earn, the more you earn, the more preferences one would satisfy and as such enhance your well-being), and that raising average and total incomes generate economic growth, education continues to translate into both a good individual investment and a key element of societal advancement. Regardless of how performance is defined, in an era of tight public budgets, it is not surprising that to bring private sector’s skills and control into higher education and to tap into private money was fathomed to represent the new panacea for improved efficiency and financial capacity. Attracting less controversy than privatization, attempting to recast the tension between the efficient and creative private sector and the bloated, stagnant public one, new management techniques are being introduced. Recognizing the fact that (higher)education and power are intertwined in a process of reciprocal legitimization is nothing new. Economically “parasitic,” universities have always relied on external sources of support, a support that brought to a varying extent also a certain degree of control from the sources of power in society, be it the church, the state or more recently the market. We believe that the idiographic focus on the qualitative hierarchical heterogeneity of the human psyche can enable us to conceive economics, education, and other social constructs alike in a holistic, multi-layered dynamic way, non-reducible, neither downwards to preferences/ behavioral linearity nor upwards, portraying individual as diluted into the collective, “the public.”

Keywords

Homo economicus New public management Education Privatization, (Public) Value 

References

  1. Antoniuk, L., & Zaprovodiuk, A. (2018). The role of venture capital in the national innovative system. In J. Valsiner, A. Lutsenko, & A. Antoniouk (Eds.), Sustainable Futures For Higher Education: The Making of Knowledge Makers. Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Baerveldt, C., & Cresswell, J. (2014). Creativity and the generative approach to culture and meaning. In V. P. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from social and cultural psychology (pp. 93–107). Hove, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Benington, J., & Moore, M. (2011). Public value in complex and changing times. In J. Benington & M. Moore (Eds.), Public value: theory and practice (pp. 1–30). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, P. (1963). Sociology: A humanistic perspective. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1988). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Callinicos, A. (2006). Universities in a neoliberal world. London: Bookmarks Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N., & Foucault, M. (2006). Human nature: Justice vs. power (1971): A debate between Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault. In N. Chomsky & M. Foucault (Eds.), The Chomsky-Foucault debate: On human nature (pp. 1–67). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  9. Collyer, F., & White, K. (1997). Enter the market: Competition, regulation and hospital funding in Australia. The Australian And New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 33, 344–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbett, A. (2012). Principles, problems, politics: what does the historical record of EU cooperation in higher education tell the EHEA generation? In A. Curaj, P. Scott, L. Vlasceanu, & L. Wilson (Eds.), European higher education at the crossroads: Between the bologna process and national reforms. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Corbyn, Z. (2009). Bang for your bucks. The Times Higher Education Supplement, 32.Google Scholar
  12. Couee, I. (2013). The economics of creative research. EMBO Reports, 14(3), 222–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniels, H. (2006). The ‘social’ in post-Vygotskian theory. Theory & Psychology, 16(1), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Boer, H. F., Enders, J. R., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 73, 27–46.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: H. Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Diederich, P., & Hampel, R. L. (2014). Paul Diederich and the progressive American high school, 1930–1970 Charlotte. NC: IAP—Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber. Organization. Ethics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. (2012a). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions—Rethinking education: Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. (2012b). Joint report of the council and the commission on the implementation of the strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET 2020)Education and Training in a smart, sustainable and inclusive Europe’. OJ C 70.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. (2016). Strategic framework—Education & training. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework_en.
  21. European Council. (2009). Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (‘ET 2020’). The Council of the European Union.Google Scholar
  22. European Council. (2013). Council conclusions on investing in education and training—A response toRethinking education: Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomesand the2013 annual growth survey’. The Council of the European Union.Google Scholar
  23. European Council. (2015). Joint report of the council and the commission on the implementation of the strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET 2020). New priorities for European cooperation in education and training.Google Scholar
  24. Ford, M. P. (2002). Beyond the modern university: Toward a constructive postmodern university. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline & punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.) (Second Vintage Books Edition, May 1995 ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  27. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  28. Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 93–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman, M. (1970). The counter-revolution in monetary theory: First Wincott memorial lecture. London: Published for the Wincott Foundation by the Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  31. Giaimo, S. (1995). Health care reform in Britain and Germany: Recasting the political bargain with the medical profession. Governance, 8(3):354–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gidley, J. M. (2012). Re-imagining the role and function of higher education for alternative futures through embracing global knowledge futures. In P. Scott, A. Curaj, L. R. Vlăsceanu, & L. Wilson (Eds.), European higher education at the crossroads: Between the Bologna process and national reforms. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Gidley, J. M. (2013). Futures of education for rapid global-societal change. In F. González (Ed.), Imagining the future. Madrid, Spain: BBVA.Google Scholar
  34. Gryga, V. (2018). The emerging technology as an economic policy category. In J. Valsiner, A. Lutsenko, & A. Antoniouk (Eds.), Sustainable Futures For Higher Education: The Making of Knowledge Makers. Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Heyne, P., Boettke, P., & Prychitko, D. (2014). The economic way of thinking, 13th international ed. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  36. In Defence of Public Higher Education. (2016). Knowledge for a successful society. A response to ‘Success as a Knowledge Economy. Retrieved from Jouke de Vries. (2017). Interviewer: J. P. Myklebust. University World News.Google Scholar
  37. Jarvis, A. (2017). Is there a crisis of confidence in our universities? Paper presented at the The Case Europe Annual Conference 2017, Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
  38. Kohn, A. (2014). The myth of the spoiled child: Challenging the conventional wisdom about children and parenting. Boston, MA: Da Capo Lifelong.Google Scholar
  39. Krasovska, O., Andrushchenko, V., & Velichko, I (2018). Scientific cooperation in basic research and higher education. In J. Valsiner, A. Lutsenko, & A. Antoniouk (Eds.), Sustainable Futures For Higher Education: The Making of Knowledge Makers. Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Lutsenko, A. (2018). Organisational Learning Mechanisms and Corporate Entrepreneurial Orientation. In J. Valsiner, A. Lutsenko, & A. Antoniouk (Eds.), Sustainable Futures For Higher Education: The Making of Knowledge Makers. Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and markets in higher education: A glonacal analysis. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 175–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McIlwain, C. (2010). What science is really worth. Nature, 465(10), 682–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Myklebust, J. P. (2017). In search of a new form of university governance. University World News. http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=2017030918094136.
  45. Neave, G. (2005a). Presentation to the seminarThe social dimension of the european higher education area and world wide competition”. Paris: The Sorbonne.Google Scholar
  46. Neave, G. (2005b). The social dimension and social cohesion. Or, on reconciling Adam Smith with Thomas Hobbes. Paper presented at the Social Dimension of the European Higher Education Area and World Wide Competition, The Sorbonne, Paris.Google Scholar
  47. Nóvoa, A. (2013). The blindness of Europe: New fabrications in the European educational space. Sisyphus Journal of Education, 1(1), 104–123.Google Scholar
  48. OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Retrieved from Paris.Google Scholar
  49. OECD. (2015). Education policy outlook 2015. Making reforms happen. Retrieved from Paris.Google Scholar
  50. OECD. (2016). Economic Policy Reforms: Going for Growth. Retrieved from Paris.Google Scholar
  51. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy.Google Scholar
  52. Osborne, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2002). The new public management in context. In K. McLaughlin, et al. (Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects (pp. 7–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Pereyra, M., Kotthoff, H., & Cowen, R. (Eds.). (2011). PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Poddiakov, A. N. (2001). Counteraction as a crucial factor of learning, education and development: Opposition to help. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(3).Google Scholar
  55. Pollock, A., & Leys, C. (2004). NHS plc: The privatisation of our health care. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  56. Pollock, A., Shaoul, J., & Vickers, N. (2002). Private finance and ‘value for money’ in NHS hospitals: a policy in search of a rationale? British Medical Journal, 324(7347), 1205–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Psacharopoulos, G. (2014). The returns to investment in higher education. In M. E. Menon, D. G. Terkla, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), Using data to improve higher education. Global perspectives on higher education. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.Google Scholar
  58. Rawolle, S., Wells, M., & Paatsch, L. (2016). School improvement as a global movement. In S. Rawolle, M. Wells, & L. Paatsch (Eds.), Improving schools. Productive tensions between the local, the systemic and the global (pp. 1–24). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Rhodes, R. A., & Wanna, J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the platonic guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66, 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Robertson, L., & Dale, R. (2016). Comparing policies in a globalising world: Methodological reflections. In A. Hadjar & C. Gross (Eds.), Education systems and inequalities (pp. 33–50). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rose, S. (2005, 2 June 2005). I’ll show you mine if… Guardian.Google Scholar
  62. Roszak, T. (1967). On academic delinquency. In T. Roszak (Ed.), The dissenting academy (Vol. 4). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  63. Salvatore, S., Lauro-Grotto, R., Gennaro, A., & Gelo, O. (2009). Attempts to grasp the dynamicity of intersubjectivity. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and develop-mental sciences (pp. 171–190). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (EASA Series) (pp. 57–89). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Suchman, M. C. (1995). ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. The World Bank. The World Development Report 2018 (WDR 2018)—Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018.
  69. Valsiner, J. (1988). Developmental psychology in the Soviet Union. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Valsiner, J. (2008). Open intransitivity cycles in development and education: Pathways to synthesis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  73. Van der Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: a guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Varzi, A. C. (1997) Boundaries, Continuity, and Contact. Nous, 31(1):26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weiler, K., & Mitchell, C. (Eds.). (1992). What schools do: Critical pedagogy and practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  76. Whitfield, D. (2010). Global auction of public assets: public sector alternatives to the infrastructure market and public private partnerships. Nottingham: Spokesman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Investment BankLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations