Advertisement

Implementation of Curriculum Theory in Formation of Specialists in Higher Education

  • Kaarel HaavEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Psychology of Education book series (CPED, volume 7)

Abstract

Author describes his contribution to curriculum theory and his experiences in using it in his research, development and teaching. It concerns overcoming the contradiction between the humanist goal in education theory and delivery of subject knowledge in practice. Formation of men, specialists and citizens has been the main curriculum goal more than a century. This goal should determine selection of study materials (subjects, concepts and theories). So far, designers of syllabuses have followed the subject logic and failed to integrate it with humanist concepts. Many curriculum theorists did not find any common theoretical ground for scientific, humanist and educational theories. They combined theories of man with social and cultural demands and treated them as the three main factors for curriculum (and student) development. This framework is eclectic as it contrasts theoretical phenomena with social ones (representatives of society and culture). It also discriminates students. It does not take them as equal partners and actors in their own development. Author has overcome these shortcomings. He has relied on the political or pluralist model of curriculum design in which teachers, students and employers are equal partners. In this model, men are represented by students, society—by employers and culture—by educational institutions and teachers. Author has added to this political model also the conceptual one that combines theories of man, society and culture. It focuses on initial definition of man, society and culture as mutually inclusive and integrated. All curricula, sciences and courses are parts of culture. They are sign systems that refer to different aspect of relations between man, society, culture and nature. This conceptual system enables to integrate all courses, all syllabuses with concepts of man and human development. Author has implemented this new conceptual system in his teaching and curriculum development at the Tallinn University of Technology. He also did this in his research on curriculum practice in Estonia and other countries.

Keywords

Curriculum Estonia Discrimination 

References

  1. Haav, K. (2010). Education for democratic citizenship: Development of the theoretical framework for Estonia and European Union. In P. Müürsepp (Ed.), Proceedings of the Institute for European Studies, Journal of Tallinn University of Technology, 7, 168–192. http://www.ies.ee/iesp/No7/iesp_no7.pdf.
  2. Haav, K. (2012). History of curricula and development of sociological curriculum theory in Estonia. Journal Sociology of Science and Technology, St. Petersburg, 3(3), 54–73. http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/history-of-curricula-and-development-of-sociological-curriculum-theory-in-estonia.
  3. Haav, K. (2015). Õppekava mudelid ja õpiväljundite arendus inimese, kodaniku ja spetsialisti kujundamisel Eestis. (Introduction of outcome-based curricula into higher education and development of curriculum theory in Estonia). - Riigikogu Toimetised (Rito), 32, 119–132. http://rito.riigikogu.ee/eelmised-numbrid/nr-32/.
  4. He, M. F., Schultz, B. D., & Schubert, W. H. (Eds.). (2015). The SAGE curriculum in education. Los Angeles, London: SAGE Reference.Google Scholar
  5. Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum. Theory and practice. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  6. Kridel, C. (Ed.). (2010). SAGE’s Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  7. Oliva, P. F. (2012). Developing the curriculum (8th ed.). Boston, New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  8. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. R., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (2008). Understanding curriculum. Introduction to the study of historical & contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
  9. Slattery, P. (2013). Curriculum development in the postmodern era (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Sowell, E. J. (2005). Curriculum. An integrative introduction (3rd ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Pearson.Google Scholar
  11. Rutiku, S., Valk, A., Pilli, E. & Vanari, K. (2009). Õppekava arendamise juhendmaterjal. (Guidelines for curriculum development). Tartu: Primus Archimedes.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations