Advertisement

Beyond Examinations and Assessment: Pathways to Productivity

  • Rebekka Mai EckerdalEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Psychology of Education book series (CPED, volume 7)

Abstract

In this chapter, a critical analysis of the role of examinations in knowledge creation is given. Based on the materials of Danish universities where oral examinations are practiced, the limits of this form of assessment are outlined. A new system of knowledge testing—the “100 plus” system—is offered that would make examinations productive in the üromotion of creative solutions in the knowledge domains under consideration.

Keywords

Examinations Full knowledge Creativity “100 plus” Denmark 

References

  1. Andreasen, K., Friche, N., & Rasmussen, A. (2011). Evaluering i uddannelsespolitik og praksis. In K. Andreasen, N. Friche & A. Rasmussen (Eds.), Målt & vejet: Uddannelsesforskning om evaluering (pp. 9–34) [25 pages].Google Scholar
  2. Andreasen, K., Friche, N., & Rasmussen, A. (2011). Forord. In K. Andreasen, N. Friche, & A. Rasmussen, A. (Eds.), Målt & vejet: Uddannelsesforskning om evaluering (pp. 7–8) [2 pages].Google Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M. & Oettingen, G. (2010). Motivation. In S. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzay (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 268–316). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Brinkmann, S. (2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 720–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkmann, S. (2016). Ståsteder: 10 gamle ideer til en ny verden (pp. 7–38). Kbh.: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, W. B. (1963). Informal sociology: A casual introduction to sociological thinking. Random House, New York, 70 pp (Sometimes attributed to Albert Einstein).Google Scholar
  7. Einstein, A. (1949). Notes for an autobiography. The Saturday Review, November 26, 1949, pp. 9–12 [3 pages].Google Scholar
  8. Elmholdt, C. W., & Tanggaard, L. (2007). Deltagelse, læring og identitet på tværs af uddannelses- og professionspraksis. In S. Brinkmann, & L. Tanggaard (Eds.), Psykologi: forskning og profession (pp. 97–119) (Chapter 4). Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar
  9. Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education: Analytical abstractions and everyday experience. In R. J. Sternberg & L.F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 103–136). Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning (pp. 6–28) [18 pages]. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  11. Franken, R. E. (2002). Human motivation (5th ed., pp. 1–25 & 383–411) [52 pages]. Wadsworth: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  12. Gibbs, G. (1992). Assessing more students. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs, G. (2010). Using assessment to support student learning (pp. 1–49). Leeds Metropolitan University. ISBN 978-1-907240-06-5.Google Scholar
  14. Hansen, V. R. (1977). For og imod karakterer og eksamen. In P. Allerup et al. (Eds.), Evalueringsproblemer (pp. 29–37). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobsen, A., Rump, C., Clemmensen, T., & May, M. (1999). Kvalitetsudviklingsprojektet “Faglig Sammenhæng”. Hovedrapport. CDM’s skriftserie nr. 1, DTU (pp. 35–56).Google Scholar
  16. Jaspal, R., Carriere, K. R., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2016). Bridging micro, meso, and macro processes in social psychology. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato & V. Dazzani (Eds.), Psychology as a science of human being: The Yokohama Manifesto (pp. 265–278). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, J. (1977a). Om nytten af karaktergivning. In P. Allerup et al. (Eds.), Evalueringsproblemer (pp. 16–29). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  18. Jensen, J. A. (1977b). Eksamination af eksamen. In Allerup et al. (Eds.), Evalueringsproblemer (pp. 38–46). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  19. Krogh, L. (2011). Validiteten af eksamener på videregående uddannelser. In K. Andreasen, N. Friche & A. Rasmussen (Eds.), Målt & vejet: Uddannelsesforskning om evaluering (pp. 109–135).Google Scholar
  20. Kvale, S. (1970). En eksaminasjon av universitetseksamener. Norway: Universitets-forlaget.Google Scholar
  21. Maciel, D. A., Branco, A. U., & Valsiner, J. (2004). Bidirectional process of knowledge construction in teacher-student transaction. In: A. U. Branco & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Communication and metacommunication in a human development (pp. 109–125). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (2nd ed., pp. 39–58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, C. M. I., & Parlett, M. (1974). Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  25. Nielsen, K., & Tanggaard, L. (2011). Pædagogisk psykologi: en grundbog. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  26. Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peirce, C. S. (1901). On the logic of drawing history from ancient documents especially from testimonies (Logic of history). MS [R] 690.Google Scholar
  28. Peirce, C. S. (1911). Letter to J. H. Kehler. L [R] 231.Google Scholar
  29. Pizarroso, N., & Valsiner, J. (2009). Why developmental psychology is not developmental: Moving towards abductive methodology. Paper presented at the Society of Research in Child Development Conference, Denver, Co., April 3, 2009, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  30. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salvatore, S. (2016) Cultural psychology of desire. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato & V. Dazzani (Eds.), Psychology as a science of human being: The Yokohama Manifesto (pp. 33–50). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Snyder, B. R. (1971). The hidden curriculum. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Stadil, C., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). In the shower with Picasso: Sparking your creativity and imagination (1st ed.). London: Lid Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Thomsen, E. (1977). Nogle problemer ved vurdering og karaktergivning. In P. Allerup et al. (Eds.), Evalueringsproblemer (pp. 47–73). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  35. Valsiner, J. (2003). Missions in history and history through a mission: Inventing better worlds for humankind. The First Annual Casimir Lecture Studies in History of Education. Leiden University, December 12, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  36. Valsiner, J. (2008). Open intransitivity cycles in development and education: Pathways to synthesis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(2), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zittoun, T., Valsiner, J., Vedeler, D., Salgado, J., Gonçalves, M., & Ferring, D. (2013). Human development in the life course: Melodies of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Viborg Kommune, Børn & Unge, Familie og rådgivningViborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations