Advertisement

Manufacturing the Industrial Citizen

  • Joshua W. CleggEmail author
  • Joseph A. Ostenson
  • Bradford J. Wiggins
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Psychology of Education book series (CPED, volume 7)

Abstract

Over the last half-century, we have seen a widely documented shift toward neoliberal, (new) managerial, and industrial institutions of higher learning. In this chapter, we briefly outline this trend and provide an analysis of how it shapes the persons and communities that make up higher education. Specifically, we discuss how the changes in curriculum (from liberal to technical and vocational), organizational structure (from relational to managerial), and funding (decreased state and increased private funding) constitute a new framework for the industrialized student and teacher. This framework follows a fairly typical neoliberal script: Within higher education, we see the imposition of surveillance (assessment) to enforce conformism (standardization), and we likewise see the weakening of the capacity for any resistance, accomplished both through the engineering of precarity (defunding) and through an artificially narrowed public vision (vocationalized curriculum). We argue here that shifts of these kinds socialize scholars, whether student or faculty, into a system-aligned worldview—that is, into a narrow, conformist, bureaucratic consciousness and a politically neutral, largely consumerist conception of public life. Higher education is thus being maneuvered (not without resistance) away from the education of a publicly engaged, creative, alert citizenry and toward the socialization of the industrialized citizen—a more-or-less interchangeable, easily manageable component in a mass “economy.”

Keywords

Neoliberalism Conformity Resistance Citizenship 

References

  1. Baker, K. J. (March 10, 2015). ‘Detenure’ and its discontents. Chronicle Vitae. Retrieved from https://chroniclevitae.com/news/937-detenure-and-its-discontents.
  2. Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. W. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59, 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt, M. J., Ijzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., et al. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camera, L. (2016, September 22). Democrats look to increase federal role in college accreditation. U.S. News and World Report. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com.
  5. Clawson, D. (2009). Tenure and the future of the university. Science, 324, 1147–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clegg, J. W. (2016). Reconsidering philosophy of science pedagogy in psychology: An evaluation of methods texts. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000035 (Advance online publication).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delta Cost Project at American Institutes for Research. (2015). Trends in College Spending [Institutional Snapshot]. Retrieved from http://www.tcs-online.org.
  8. Dey, E. L., Milem, J. F., & Berger, J. B. (1997). Changing patterns of publication productivity: Accumulative advantage or institutional isomorphism? Sociology of Education, 70, 308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flaherty, C. (2015, March 3). U. Tennessee System backtracks on ‘de-tenure’ language. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com.
  10. Gale, W., Harris, B., Renaud, B., & Rodihan, K. (2014). Student loans rising: An overview of causes, consequences, and policy options (May 2014). Retrieved from The Brookings Institution website: http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2014/05/student-loan-debt-rising-gale-harris.
  11. Ginsberg, B. (2011). The fall of the faculty: The rise of the all-administrative university and why it matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Giroux, H. A. (1999). Vocationalizing higher education: Schooling and the politics of corporate culture. College Literature, 147–161.Google Scholar
  13. Gouldner, A. W. (1957). Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles. I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 281–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gumport, P. J. (2001). Built to serve: The enduring legacy of public higher education. In P. G. Altbach, P. J. Gumport, & B. Johnstone (Eds.), In defense of American higher education (pp. 85–109). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hefling, K. (2015, June 18). Walker’s latest target: College professors. Politico. Retrieved from http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/scott-walker-targets-college-professors-unions-wisconsin-119124.
  16. Hill, P. (2012, November/December). Online educational delivery models: A descriptive view. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero.
  17. Kezar, A. J. (2004). Obtaining integrity? Reviewing and examining the charter between higher education and society. The Review of Higher Education, 27, 429–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levinson, R. M. (1989). The faculty and institutional isomorphism. Academe, 85, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milem, J. F., Berger, J. B., & Dey, E. L. (2000). Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 454–475.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, R. B. (2004). Facing human suffering: Psychology and psychotherapy as moral engagement. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morphew, C. C. (2000). Institutional diversity, program acquisition and faculty members: Examining academic drift at a new level. Higher Education Policy, 13, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morphew, C. C. (2009). Conceptualizing change in the institutional diversity of US colleges and universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 243–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morphew, C., & Huisman, J. (2002). Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe, 27, 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
  26. Ostenson, J. A., Clegg, J. W., & Wiggins, B. J. (2017). Industrialized higher education and its sustainable alternatives. The Review of Higher Education, 40, 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ray, J., & Kafka, S. (2014, May 6). Life in college matters for life after college. Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/168848/life-college-matters-life-college.aspx.
  28. The Coalition on the Academic Workforce. (2012, June). A portrait of part-time faculty members. Retrieved from http://www.academicworkforce.org/CAW_portrait_2012.pdf.
  29. The College Board. (2014). Trends in college pricing. Retrieved from The College Board website: http://trends.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/2014-trends-college-pricing-final-web.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua W. Clegg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joseph A. Ostenson
    • 2
  • Bradford J. Wiggins
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, John Jay CollegeThe Graduate Center, City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral SciencesThe University of Tennessee at MartinMartinUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyBrigham Young University—IdahoRexburgUSA

Personalised recommendations