Skip to main content

Resilience Engineering: Concepts of the New Paradigm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Digital Transformation

Abstract

Resilience Engineering is a new safety paradigm that considers that the way duties are normally performed is something that is subject to variability, and since change is necessary to achieve success it should not be restricted. People in this complex context are continuously making adjustments to the original design, enabling them to achieve success, but occasionally accidents also arise due to an incomplete analysis of the current conditions. Thus, linear, simple or complex causation models do not reflect the ongoing reality, which is essentially non-linear, besides being complex. The accident “emerges” from normality, due to concurrent events that “resonate”, and are not “caused” by a simple chain of errors. Therefore, new tools are required to analyse accidents and indicators to monitor processes, even though most simple incidents continue to be dealt with in the usual manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Costella MF, Saurin TA, de Macedo Guimarães LB (2009) A method for assessing health and safety management systems from the resilience engineering perspective. Saf Sci 47(8):1056–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2004) Barriers and accident prevention. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2007) http://www.sites.google.com/site/erikhollnagel2/whatisresilienceengineering%3F

  • Hollnagel E (2009) The ETTO principle. In: Efficiency-thoroughness trade-off. Why things that go right sometimes go wrong. Ashgate, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2012) FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method. In: Modelling complex socio technical systems. Ashagate, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods D, Leveson N (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Coze JC (2013) New models for new times. An anti-dualist move. Saf Sci 59:200–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson N (2003) White paper on approaches to safety engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero Martínez R (2011) Ingeniería de la Resiliencia. Nueva tendencia en la gestión de la seguridad y salud laboral, Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo 63:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents. In: Living with high risk technologies. Basico Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci 27(2/3):183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason J (2008) The human contribution. Accidents, unsafe acts and heroic recoveries. Ash-gate

    Google Scholar 

  • Saurin TA, Carim Junior GC (2011) Evaluation and improvement of a method for assessing HSMS from the resilience engineering perspective: a case study of an electricity distributor. Saf Sci 49:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurin TA, Formoso CT, Cambraia FB (2008) An analysis of construction safety best practices from a cognitive systems engineering perspective. Saf Sci 46:1169–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen R, Aven T (2011) A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering. Saf Sci 49:292–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD (2005) Creating foresight: lessons for resilience from Columbia. In: Farjoun M, Satarbuck WH (eds) Organization at the limit. NASA and the Columbia Disaster, Oxford, Backwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD (2015) Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 141:5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wreathall J (2006) Properties of resilient organizations: an initial view. In: Hollnagel E, Woods D, Leveson N (eds) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for financing project BIA2016-79270-P, of which this paper forms a part, and also to the University of Malaga for its support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rubio-Romero, J.C., Pardo-Ferreira, M.d.C., Rojas, M., López-Arquillos, A., Suarez-Cebador, M. (2019). Resilience Engineering: Concepts of the New Paradigm. In: Ortiz, Á., Andrés Romano, C., Poler, R., García-Sabater, JP. (eds) Engineering Digital Transformation. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96005-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96005-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96004-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96005-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics