To Measure Is to Know: Development of an Instrument for Measuring Consulting Service Value

  • Severin Oesterle
  • Arne Buchwald
  • Nils UrbachEmail author
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


While their fundamental business model has not changed for many decades, consulting firms are currently faced with serious challenges putting the complete market at the risk of disruption. Given that situation, it is essential for consultancies to understand how value emerges in consulting projects in the eyes of their clients. Turning to the customer perspective, it is also important to understand how value emerges from the relationship with consultancies. While previous literature provides valuable but fragmented starting points to explain the joint value creation in IT consulting projects, we suggested a synthesized conceptual model drawing on the service-dominant logic in a previous article that integrates both the service provider and client perspectives. In this article, we now put forth a measurement instrument that we subjected to a preliminary empirical validation with which the important determinants in both spheres can be assessed to ultimately explain the value of the IT consulting service in a follow-up, large-scale quantitative-empirical validation.


  1. Alborz S, Seddon P, Scheepers R (2003) A model of studying IT outsourcing relationships. In: Proceedings of the 7th Pacific Asia conference on information systems (PACIS), Adelaide, Australia, Paper 90, 10–13 JulGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnould EJ, Price LL, Malshe A (2014) Toward a cultural resource-based theory of the customer. In: Lusch RF, Vargo SL (eds) The service-dominant logic of marketing: dialog, debate, and directions. Routledge, New York, pp 91–104Google Scholar
  3. Ballantyne D, Varey RJ (2006) Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Mark Theory 6:335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballantyne D, Frow P, Varey RJ, Payne A (2011) Value propositions as communication practice: taking a wider view. Ind Mark Manag 40:202–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrutia JM, Gilsanz A (2013) Electronic service quality and value do consumer knowledge-related resources matter. J Serv Res 16:231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker J-M, Rai A, Ringle CM, Völckner F (2013) Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Q 37:665–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergeron J, Ricard L, Perrien J (2001) Relationship marketing: the role of client knowledge, service quality and expertise. In: Proceedings of the 9th international colloquium on relationship marketing, Montréal, Canada, 24–26 Sept 2001Google Scholar
  8. Boh W, Ren Y, Kiesler S (2002) Managing expertise in a distributed environment. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on information systems 2002 (ICIS), Barcelona, Spain, 15–18 Dec 2002Google Scholar
  9. Brady MK, Cronin JJ (2001) Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: a hierarchical approach. J Mark 65:34–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brady MK, Knight GA, Cronin JJ, Tomas G, Hult M, Keillor BD (2005) Removing the contextual Lens: a multinational, multi-setting comparison of service evaluation models. J Retail 81:215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breidbach CF, Maglio PP (2015) A service science perspective on the role of ICT in service innovation. In: Proceedings of the 23rd European conference on information systems (ECIS), Münster, Germany, 26–29 May 2015Google Scholar
  12. Breidbach CF, Kolb DG, Srinivasan A (2013a) Connectivity in service systems: does technology-enablement impact the ability of a service system to co-create value? J Serv Res 16:428–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breidbach CF, Smith P, Callagher LJ (2013b) Advancing innovation in professional service firms: insights from the service-dominant logic. Serv Sci 5:263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruns K, Jacob F (2014) Value-in-use and mobile technologies. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Ind Mark Manag 31:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chan KW, Yim CK, Lam SS (2010) Is customer participation in value creation a double-edged sword? Evidence from professional financial services across cultures. J Mark 74:48–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chandler JD, Vargo SL (2011) Contextualization and value-in-context: how context frames exchange. Mark Theory 11:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chin WW (2003) A permutation procedure for multigroup comparison of PLS models. In: Proceedings of the PLS’03 international symposium, Lisbon, Portugal, 15–17 Sept 2003Google Scholar
  19. Christensen CM, Wang D, Dv B (2013) Consulting on the cusp of disruption. Harv Bus Rev 2013:106–115Google Scholar
  20. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cronin JJ, Brady MK, Hult GTM (2000) Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. J Retail 76:193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Das A, Soh CWL, Lee PCB (1999) A model of customer satisfaction with information technology service providers: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR conference on computer personnel research, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 8–10 Apr 1999Google Scholar
  23. Davis FD (1985) A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dayan M, Zacca R, Husain Z, Benedetto AD, Ryan JC (2016) The effect of entrepreneurial orientation, willingness to change, and development culture on new product exploration in small enterprises. J Bus Ind Market 31:668–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ennew CT, Binks MR (1999) Impact of participative service relationships on quality, satisfaction and retention: an exploratory study. J Bus Res 46:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frow P, Payne A (2011) A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. Eur J Mark 45:223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gallarza MG, Gil Saura I, Arteaga Moreno F (2013) The quality-value-satisfaction-loyalty chain: relationships and impacts. Tour Rev 68:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garcia R, Calantone R (2002) A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. J Prod Innov Manag 19:110–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goles T (2003) Vendor capabilities and outsourcing success: a resource-based view. Wirtschaftsinformatik 45:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grönroos C (2006) Adopting a service logic for marketing. Mark Theory 6:317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grönroos C, Ravald A (2011) Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing. J Serv Manag 22:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grönroos C, Voima P (2013) Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. J Acad Mark Sci 41:133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gruen TW, Osmonbekov T, Czaplewski AJ (2007) Customer-to-customer exchange: its MOA antecedents and its impact on value creation and loyalty. J Acad Mark Sci 35:537–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gummesson E (2007) Exit services marketing-enter service marketing. J Cust Behav 6:113–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Han H-S, Lee J-N, Seo Y-W (2008) Analyzing the impact of a firm’s capability on outsourcing success: a process perspective. Inform Manag 45:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heinonen K, Strandvik T, Mickelsson K-J, Edvardsson B, Sundström E, Andersson P (2010) A customer-dominant logic of service. J Serv Manag 21:531–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henseler J (2007) A new and simple approach to multi-group analysis in partial least squares path modeling. In: Proceedings of the PLS’07—The 5th international symposium on PLS and related methods, Matforsk, Aas, Norway, 5–7 September 2007Google Scholar
  39. Hoffman RR (1998) How can expertise be defined? Implications of research from cognitive psychology. In: Williams R et al (eds) Exploring expertise. University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh, pp 81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaiser S, Ringlstetter MJ (2011) Strategic management of professional service firms. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kang G-D (2006) The hierarchical structure of service quality: integration of technical and functional quality. Manag Serv Qual Int J 16:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kellermanns FW, Eddleston KA (2006) Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: a family perspective. Entrep Theory Pract 30:809–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kelley SW, Donnelly JH Jr, Skinner SJ (1990) Customer participation in service production and delivery. J Retail 66:315Google Scholar
  44. Kirby DA, Dylan J-E (1997) Small technology-based professional consultancy Services in the United Kingdom. Serv Ind J 17:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ko D-G, Kirsch LJ, King WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Q 29:59–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kowalkowski C (2011) Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service-dominant logic. Eur J Mark 45:277–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lusch RF, Nambisan S (2015) Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Q 39:155–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lusch RF, Vargo SL, O’Brien M (2007) Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. J Retail 83:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Madhavaram S, Hunt SD (2008) The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. J Acad Mark Sci 36:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McCarthy JC, Matzke P (2010) The coming upheaval. InTech Services, Forrester ResearchGoogle Scholar
  51. Metselaar EE (1997) Assessing the willingness to change: construction and validation of the DINAMO. Doctoral disserationGoogle Scholar
  52. Mohan K, Urbach N (2012) Do we fully understand the critical success factors of employee portal utilitarianism?—Uncovering and accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. In: Proceedings of the 20th European conference on information systems (ECIS), Barcelona, Spain, 10–13 Jun 2012Google Scholar
  53. Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 2:192–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oesterle S, Buchwald A, Urbach N (2016) Understanding the co-creation of value emerging from the collaboration between IT consulting firms and their customers. In: Proceedings of the 37th international conference on information systems (ICIS), Dublin, Ireland, 11–14 Dec 2016Google Scholar
  55. OʼFarrell PN, Hitchins DM (1988) Inter-firm comparison in industrial research: the utility of a matched pairs design. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 79:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oh H (1999) Service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer value: a holistic perspective. Int J Hosp Manag 18:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paredes MR, Barrutia JM, Echebarria C (2014) Resources for value co-creation in E-commerce: a review. Electron Commer Res 14:111–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Park J-W, Robertson R, Wu C-L (2004) The effect of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioural intentions: a Korean case study. J Air Transp Manag 10:435–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peck F (1985) The use of matched-pairs research design in industrial surveys. Environ Plan A 17:981–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pereira CS, Soares AL (2007) Improving the quality of collaboration requirements for information management through social networks analysis. Int J Inf Manag 27:86–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Richter A, Schmidt SL (2006) Antecedents of the performance of management consultans. Schmalenbachs Bus Rev 58:365–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roberts N, Galluch PS, Dinger M, Grover V (2012) Absorptive capacity and information systems research: review, synthesis, and directions for future research. MIS Q 36:625–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sandström S, Edvardsson B, Kristensson P, Magnusson P (2008) Value in use through service experience. Manag Serv Qual Int J 18:112–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharma N, Patterson PG (2000) Switching costs, alternative attractiveness and experience as moderators of relationship commitment in professional, consumer services. Int J Serv Ind Manag 11:470–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Skålén P, Gummerus J, von Koskull C, Magnusson PR (2014) Exploring value propositions and service innovation: a service-dominant logic study. J Acad Mark Sci 43:137–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Straub DW (1989) Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Q 13:147–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Urbach N, Ahlemann F (2010) Structural equation Modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. J Inform Technol Theory Appl (JITTA) 11:5–40Google Scholar
  68. Vargo SL, Akaka MA (2009) Service-dominant logic as a Foundation for Service Science: clarifications. Serv Sci 1:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark 68:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J Acad Mark Sci 36:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2016) Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. J Acad Mark Sci:1–19Google Scholar
  72. Vargo SL, Maglio PP, Akaka MA (2008) On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur Manag J 26:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Varki S, Colgate M (2001) The role of price perceptions in an integrated model of behavioral intentions. J Serv Res 3:232–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Veit D et al (2014) Business models. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang CL (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrep Theory Pract 32:635–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yi Y, Gong T (2013) Customer value co-creation behavior: scale development and validation. J Bus Res 66:1279–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yoon S, Suh H (2004) Ensuring IT consulting SERVQUAL and user satisfaction: a modified measurement tool. Inf Syst Front 6:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zacharia ZG, Nix NW, Lusch RF (2011) Capabilities that enhance outcomes of an episodic supply chain collaboration. J Oper Manag 29:591–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.EBS Business SchoolWiesbadenGermany

Personalised recommendations