Abstract
The present paper focuses on a comparison between expressive features of principal members of the British English emotion cluster of compassion (empathy, sympathy and compassion) and their prototypical dictionary equivalents in Polish, empatia and współczucie. A cross-cultural asymmetry between the English and Polish clusters is argued to increase in the case of the Polish emotion sympatia, which presents a more peripheral correspondence pattern than the more polysemous concept of English sympathy and is shown to belong to a different Emotion Cluster (love/happiness). The expression features of empathy, sympathy and compassion in British English and Polish need to be tuned accordingly in socially interactive robots to enable them to operate successfully in these cultures. The results showed that British English compassion is characterized by more positive valence and more of a desire to act than Polish współczucie. Polish empatia, as juxtaposed to British English empathy, which has a wider range of application, presents a less consistent pattern of correspondences. The results further showed that although the processes of emotion recognition and expression in robotics must be tuned to culture-specific emotion models, the more explicit patterns of responsiveness (British English for the compassion model in our case) is also recommended for the transfer to make cognitive and sensory infocommunication more readily interpretable by interacting agents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Apart from individualism-collectivism, Hofstede has developed other dimensions pertaining to culture, namely power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity, indulgence, and long term orientation [18]. However, these are beyond the scope of the present focus.
- 2.
In Polish this shift in meaning is accompanied by a historical syntactic change: from the older form współczuć z kimś ‘to co-feel with somebody’ to the contemporary structure współczuć komuś lit. ‘to co-feel [to] somebody’ (Dative case).
- 3.
Descriptions of the power, arousal and novelty dimensions are not provided as these dimensions are not included in the GRID analyses in the present study.
- 4.
Each of the participants was randomly presented with 4 of the 24 prototypical emotion terms to rate and each of these terms was rated separately on each of the 144 emotion features.
- 5.
Due to space restrictions what is presented in this section is a summary of the procedure followed to select the emotion terms.
- 6.
As each participant rated 4 of the 24 prototypical emotion terms on the 144 emotion features, the overall amount of subjects in the British English and Polish datasets is larger than the numbers of participants that rated the specific emotion terms in each language.
References
Alam F, Danieli M, Riccardi G (2016) Can we detect speakers’ empathy? A real-life case study. In: 7th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2016.7804525
Baranyi P, Csapo A (2012) Definition and synergies of cognitive infocommunications. Acta Polytechnica Hungarcia 9(1):67–83
Batson CD, Fultz J, Schoenrade PA (1987) Distress and empathy: two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. J Personal 55(1):19–39
Berthelon F, Sander P (2013) Emotion ontology for context awareness. In: 4th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2013.6719313
Choi I, Nisbett RE, Norenzayan A (1999) Causal attribution across cultures: variation and universality. Psychol Bull 125:47–63
Condon P, Barrett LF (2013) Conceptualizing and experiencing compassion. Emotion 13(5):817–821
Dube L, Le Bel J (2003) The content and structure of laypeople’s concept of pleasure. Cognit Emot 17(2):263–295
Ellsworth PC, Scherer KR (2003) Appraisal processes in emotion. In: Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith H (eds) Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 572–595
Fontaine JJR (2013) Dimensional, basic emotion, and componential approaches to meaning in psychological emotion research. In: Fontaine JJR, Scherer KR, Soriano C (eds) Components of emotional meaning: a sourcebook. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 31–45
Fontaine JJR, Poortinga YH, Setiadi B (2002) Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and The Netherlands. Cognit Emot 16(1):61–86
Fontaine JJR, Scherer KR (2013) The global meaning structure of the emotion domain: Investigating the complementarity of multiple perspectives on meaning. In: Fontaine JJR, Scherer KR, Soriano C (eds) Components of emotional meaning: a sourcebook. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 106–125
Fontaine JJR, Scherer KR, Roesch EB, Ellsworth PC (2007) World of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychol Sci 18(12):1050–1057
Fontaine JJR, Scherer KR, Soriano C (eds) (2013) Components of emotional meaning: a sourcebook. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Fülöp I.M., Csapó A, Baranyi P (2013) Construction of a CogInfoCom ontology. In: 4th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp 811–816. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2013.6719210
Gladkova A (2010) Sympathy, and in English and Russian: a linguistic and cultural analysis. Culture Psychol 16(2):267–285
Goetz JL, Dacher K, Simon-Thomas E (2010) Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychol Bull 136(3):351–374
Hofstede G (1980) Cultures consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage, Beverly Hills
Hofstede G. Country comparison. https://www.geert-hofstede.com/countries.html. Accessed 12 Feb 2016
Hunyadi L (2015) On multimodality in the perception of emotions from materials of the HuComTech corpus. In: 6th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp 489–492. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2015.7390642
Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Langacker RW (1987/1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, vols 1 and 2. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B (1996) Depth of negation—a cognitive semantic study. Łódź University Press, Łódź
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B, Wilson PA (2013) English fear and Polish strach in contrast: GRID approach and cognitive corpus linguistic methodology. In: Fontaine JJR, Scherer KR, Soriano C (eds) Components of emotional meaning: a sourcebook. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 425–436
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B, Wilson PA (2015) It’s a date: love and romance in time and space. In: Paper at international workshop: love and time, University of Haifa, 8–10 March 2015
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B, Wilson PA (2016) Compassion, empathy and sympathy expression features in affective robotics. In: 7th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2016.7804526
Markus HR, Kitayame S (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98(2):224–253
Mascarenhas S, Prada R, Paiva A, Hofstede G (2013) Social importance dynamics: a model for culturally-adaptive agents. In: Aylett R, Krenn B, Pelachaud C, Shimodaira H (eds) Intelligent virtual agents, vol 8108. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 325–338
Niedenthal PM, Krauth-Gruber S, Ric F (2006) The psychology of emotion: interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. Psychology Press, New York
Ondas S, Mackova L, Hladek D (2016) Emotion analysis in DiaCoSk dialog corpus. In: 7th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2016.7804541
Osgood CE, May WH, Miron MS (1975) Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. University of Illinois Press, Chicago
Pȩzik P (2016) Exploring phraseological equivalence with paralela. In: Gruszczyńska E, Leńko-Szymańska A (eds) Polish-language parallel Corpora Warsaw. Instytut Lingwistyki Stosowanej UW, pp 67–81
Reips U-D (2002) Standards for internet-based experimenting. Exp Psychol 49:243–256
Saint-Aime S, Le Pevedic B, Duhaut D (2008) EmotiRob: an emotional interaction model. In: The 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, pp 89–94
Scherer KR (2005) What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc Sci Inf 44:693–727
Shaver P, Schwartz J, Kirston D, O’Connor C (1987) Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:1061–1086
Simon-Thomas ER, Godzik J, Castle J, Antonenko O, Ponz A, Kogan A, Keltner D (2012) An fMRI study of caring vs. self-focus during induced compassion and pride. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 7:635–648
Singer T, Lamm C (2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann New York Acad Sci 1156:81–96
Smith M, Ceni A, Milic-Frayling N, Shneiderman B, Mendes Rodrigues E, Leskovec J, Dunne C (2010) NodeXL: a free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010/2013/2016. http://nodexl.codeplex.com/ from the Social Media Research Foundation, http://www.smrfoundation.org
Szarota P, Cantarero K, Matsumoto D (2015) Emotional frankness and friendship in Polish culture. Pol Psychol Bull 46(2):181–185
Szymczak M (1981) Słownik Jȩzyka Polskiego. PWN, Warszawa
Triandis HC (1995) Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
Triandis HC (2001) Individualism-collectivism and personality. J Pers 69:907–924
Wilson PA, Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B (2014) Affective robotics: modelling and testing cultural prototypes. Cognit Comput 6(4):814–840
Yik MSM, Russell JA, Barrett LF (1999) Structure of self-reported current affect: integration and beyond. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:600–619
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., Wilson, P.A. (2019). Compassion Cluster Expression Features in Affective Robotics from a Cross-Cultural Perspective. In: Klempous, R., Nikodem, J., Baranyi, P. (eds) Cognitive Infocommunications, Theory and Applications. Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95996-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95996-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95995-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95996-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)