Skip to main content

Evidentialism: A Primer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Believing in Accordance with the Evidence

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 398))

  • 637 Accesses

Abstract

This brief chapter provides a general overview of evidentialism by explaining evidentialism’s most fundamental claim about epistemic justification, that such justification supervenes on an agent’s evidence. Additionally, the chapter explains that evidentialism requires more clarification and detailing. Finally, short summaries of the other chapters included in this book are provided in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Dougherty (2011).

  2. 2.

    It is this amazement that led them to write their landmark “Evidentialism” in 1985.

  3. 3.

    See Conee and Feldman (1985, 2004, 2008).

  4. 4.

    This is a point I emphasize in my (2014).

  5. 5.

    See Conee and Feldman (2011) and my (2014).

  6. 6.

    Thanks to Kevin Lee for helpful comments on this chapter and for editorial assistance throughout the entire volume.

References

  • Conee, E., & Feldman, R. (1985). Evidentialism. Philosophical Studies, 45, 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E., & Feldman, R. (2004). Making sense of skepticism. In E. Conee & R. Feldman (Eds.), Evidentialism (pp. 277–206). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E., & Feldman, R. (2008). Evidence. In Q. Smith (Ed.), Epistemology: New essays (pp. 83–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E., & Feldman, R. (2011). Replies. In T. Dougherty (Ed.), Evidentialism and its discontents (pp. 428–501). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, T. (2011). Introduction. In T. Dougherty (Ed.), Evidentialism and its discontents (pp. 1–14). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. (2014). Evidentialism and epistemic justification. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin McCain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McCain, K. (2018). Evidentialism: A Primer. In: McCain, K. (eds) Believing in Accordance with the Evidence. Synthese Library, vol 398. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95993-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics