Abstract
Norwegian elites do not seem to hold elitist or arrogant ideas about the population to the same extent as elites elsewhere in the world. Admittedly, elites express concerns about high levels of political indifference among citizens. Moreover, about half of the members of the national elite fear that citizens are too easily influenced by charismatic politicians. Nevertheless, they are not worried about voters’ level of competence. The elites in Norway are critical towards the politicians’ inclination to follow the sways of opinion among the voters. But such critical attitudes have not led to widespread anti-democratic elitist sentiments. Elites’ elitist opinions seem to be primarily related to the elite persons’ ideological stance. The analyses presented in this chapter demonstrate that elite individuals who endorse a right-wing ideology overall express more strongly elitist views.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aardal, Bernt (ed.). 2003. Velgere i villrede ... En analyse av stortingsvalget 2001. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Aalberg, Torill. 1998. Norske likhetsverdier i et komparativt perspektiv. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 39: 490–515.
Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove. 2014. How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies 47: 1324–1353.
Blau, Peter. 1956. Occupational Mobility and Inter-Personal Relationship. American Sociological Review 21: 290–295.
Bobbio, Norberto, and Allan Cameron. 1996. Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brennan, Jason. 2011. The Ethics of Voting. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brennan, Jason. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Daloz, Jean Pascal. 2007. Political Elites and Conspicuous Modesty: Norway, Sweden, Finland in Comparative Perspective. In Comparative Studies of Social and Political Elites. Comparative Social Research, vol. 23, ed. Fredrik Engelstad and Trygve Gulbrandsen. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ethington, Philip J. 1997. The Intellectual Construction of “Social Distance”: Toward a Recovery of Georg Simmel’s Social Geometry. Cybergo: European Journal of Geography. https://cybergeo.revues.org/227.
Fritzell, Johan, Bjørn Hvinden, Mikko Kautto, Jon Kvist, and Hannu Uusitalo. 2005. Nordic Welfare States in the European Context. London: Routledge.
Hansen, Marianne Nordli, Magne Flemmen, and Patrick Lie Andersen. 2009. The Oslo Register Data Class Scheme (ORDC). Final Report from the Classification Project. Memorandum nr.1, Institute of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo.
Holmqvist, Mikael. 2017. Leader Communities. New York: Columvia University Press.
Kahn, Shamus Rahman. 2011. Privilege. The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Karakayali, Nedim. 2009. Social Distance and Affective Orientations. Sociological Forum 24: 538–562.
Kazin, Michael. 1995. The Populist Persuasion: An American History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lasch, Christopher. 1996. Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy. New York: W.W. Norton.
Magee Joe, C., and Pamela K. Smith. 2013. The Social Distance Theory of Power. Personality and Social Psychology Review 17: 158–186.
Myhre, Jan Eivind. 2017. The Cradle of Norwegian Equality and Egalitarianism: Norway in the Nineteenth Century. In Egalitarianism in Scandinavia, ed. Synnøve Bendixen, May Bente Bringslid, and Halvard Vike, 65–85. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Park, Robert E. 1924. The Concept of Social Distance as Applied to the Study of Racial Attitudes and Racial Relations. Journal of Applied Sociology (Later Sociology and Social Research) 8 (July/August): 339–344.
Rydgren, Jens. 2013. Introduction. In Class Politics and the Radical Right, ed. Jens Rydgren. London: Routledge.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Sejersted, Francis. 1993. Demokratisk kapitalisme. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Simmel, Georg. 1971. The Stranger. In Georg Simmel, on Individuality and Social Forms, edited by Donald N. Levine, 143–149. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Sloterdijk, Peter. 2000. Die Verachtung der Massen – Versuch über Kulturkämpfe in der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Somin, Ilya. 2013. Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tarde, Gabriel. 1962. The Laws of Imitation. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
Vogel, David. 1978. Why Businessmen Distrust Their State: The Political Consciousness of Corporate Executives. British Journal of Political Science 8: 45–78.
Williams, Joyce E. 2007. Social Distance. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. George Ritzer. Hoboken: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gulbrandsen, T. (2019). Are Norwegian Elites Elitist?. In: Elites in an Egalitarian Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95984-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95984-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95983-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95984-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)