Skip to main content

Are Norwegian Elites Elitist?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Elites in an Egalitarian Society
  • 344 Accesses

Abstract

Norwegian elites do not seem to hold elitist or arrogant ideas about the population to the same extent as elites elsewhere in the world. Admittedly, elites express concerns about high levels of political indifference among citizens. Moreover, about half of the members of the national elite fear that citizens are too easily influenced by charismatic politicians. Nevertheless, they are not worried about voters’ level of competence. The elites in Norway are critical towards the politicians’ inclination to follow the sways of opinion among the voters. But such critical attitudes have not led to widespread anti-democratic elitist sentiments. Elites’ elitist opinions seem to be primarily related to the elite persons’ ideological stance. The analyses presented in this chapter demonstrate that elite individuals who endorse a right-wing ideology overall express more strongly elitist views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aardal, Bernt (ed.). 2003. Velgere i villrede ... En analyse av stortingsvalget 2001. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aalberg, Torill. 1998. Norske likhetsverdier i et komparativt perspektiv. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 39: 490–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove. 2014. How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies 47: 1324–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter. 1956. Occupational Mobility and Inter-Personal Relationship. American Sociological Review 21: 290–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto, and Allan Cameron. 1996. Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Jason. 2011. The Ethics of Voting. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Jason. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daloz, Jean Pascal. 2007. Political Elites and Conspicuous Modesty: Norway, Sweden, Finland in Comparative Perspective. In Comparative Studies of Social and Political Elites. Comparative Social Research, vol. 23, ed. Fredrik Engelstad and Trygve Gulbrandsen. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethington, Philip J. 1997. The Intellectual Construction of “Social Distance”: Toward a Recovery of Georg Simmel’s Social Geometry. Cybergo: European Journal of Geography. https://cybergeo.revues.org/227.

  • Fritzell, Johan, Bjørn Hvinden, Mikko Kautto, Jon Kvist, and Hannu Uusitalo. 2005. Nordic Welfare States in the European Context. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Marianne Nordli, Magne Flemmen, and Patrick Lie Andersen. 2009. The Oslo Register Data Class Scheme (ORDC). Final Report from the Classification Project. Memorandum nr.1, Institute of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist, Mikael. 2017. Leader Communities. New York: Columvia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Shamus Rahman. 2011. Privilege. The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakayali, Nedim. 2009. Social Distance and Affective Orientations. Sociological Forum 24: 538–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazin, Michael. 1995. The Populist Persuasion: An American History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, Christopher. 1996. Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee Joe, C., and Pamela K. Smith. 2013. The Social Distance Theory of Power. Personality and Social Psychology Review 17: 158–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myhre, Jan Eivind. 2017. The Cradle of Norwegian Equality and Egalitarianism: Norway in the Nineteenth Century. In Egalitarianism in Scandinavia, ed. Synnøve Bendixen, May Bente Bringslid, and Halvard Vike, 65–85. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Robert E. 1924. The Concept of Social Distance as Applied to the Study of Racial Attitudes and Racial Relations. Journal of Applied Sociology (Later Sociology and Social Research) 8 (July/August): 339–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydgren, Jens. 2013. Introduction. In Class Politics and the Radical Right, ed. Jens Rydgren. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sejersted, Francis. 1993. Demokratisk kapitalisme. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg. 1971. The Stranger. In Georg Simmel, on Individuality and Social Forms, edited by Donald N. Levine, 143–149. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloterdijk, Peter. 2000. Die Verachtung der Massen – Versuch über Kulturkämpfe in der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somin, Ilya. 2013. Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarde, Gabriel. 1962. The Laws of Imitation. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, David. 1978. Why Businessmen Distrust Their State: The Political Consciousness of Corporate Executives. British Journal of Political Science 8: 45–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Joyce E. 2007. Social Distance. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. George Ritzer. Hoboken: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trygve Gulbrandsen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gulbrandsen, T. (2019). Are Norwegian Elites Elitist?. In: Elites in an Egalitarian Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95984-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95984-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95983-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95984-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics