Skip to main content
Book cover

After Austen pp 127–144Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The Trouble with Mary: Curtis Sittenfeld’s Eligible and the Single Woman

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 357 Accesses

Abstract

Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792) was published two decades before Pride and Prejudice (1813) went to print, but to talk about feminism is to name a qualitatively different attitude than anything that was contemplated by Jane Austen’s society. In the twenty-first century, the choices available to women have dramatically expanded and yet it still seems as if the only permissible ending for a fictional work involving a single female character is to marry her off.

Curtis Sittenfeld’s Eligible (2016), an adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, updates Austen for the modern world. In Sittenfeld’s novel, drawing rooms have been replaced by fast food outlets, entails by double-mortgages, handsome militiamen by buff-chested Crossfit instructors, and the horror of impending spinsterhood by the ticking of fertility clocks. But it is not until the book’s last chapter that the marriage plot is finally addressed and the question that has long been a focus for Mary Bennet fan fictions gets asked—namely, how to narrate the possibility of a socially, economically, and emotionally fulfilling existence for Austen’s most famous unmarried female character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Curtis Sittenfeld, Eligible (London: Borough Press/HarperCollins, 2016), pp. 513 and 512.

  2. 2.

    James Edward Austen-Leigh, A Memoir of Jane Austen (London, Richard Bentley and Son, 1971), p. 78.

  3. 3.

    Terri Fleming, Perception (London: Orion Books, 2017), p. 3.

  4. 4.

    Colleen McCullough, The Independence of Mary Bennet (New York: Pocket Books/Simon and Schuster, 2008), pp. 20 and 22.

  5. 5.

    Ellen Moers, ‘Female Gothic’, in Literary Women (New York: Doubleday, 1976), p. 126. On feminism and the female gothic, see also, Camilla Nelson, ‘Spooky Jane: Women, History, and Horror in Death Comes to Pemberley’, Adaptation: Journal of Literature on Screen Studies, 9, 3, 2016, pp. 377–392.

  6. 6.

    Curtis Sittenfeld, Eligible (New York: Random House Penguin, 2016), p. 64.

  7. 7.

    Imelda Whelehan, The Feminist Bestseller (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), p. 176.

  8. 8.

    See Susan Wolfson’s analysis of book culture in Jane Austen’s text, ‘Re: Reading Pride and Prejudice: “What think you of books?”’ in Claudia L. Johnson and Clara Tuite, eds, A Companion to Jane Austen (Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell: 2012), pp. 112–122.

  9. 9.

    See, for example, Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981), Karen Valihora, Austen’s Oughts: Judgment after Locke and Shaftesbury (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2010), and Allan Bloom, Love and Friendship (New York, Simon and Schuster 1993).

  10. 10.

    There are a number of children’s films in which the traditional evil mother figure has been replaced by the figure of the absent working mother, including Neil Gaiman’s Coraline or Roald Dahl’s Matilda, for example.

  11. 11.

    Anthea Taylor, Single Women in Popular Culture: the Limits of Post Feminism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), p. 15.

Bibliography

  • Austen, Jane. 2001. Pride and Prejudice. New York/London: WW Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Leigh, James Edward. 1971. A Memoir of Jane Austen. London: Richard Bentley and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Allan. 1993. Pride and Prejudice. In Love and Friendship. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Cathy. 2015. Pride and Regicide. Los Gatos: Smashwords.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Roald. 1990. Matilda. New York: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitchman, Beth. 2014. Mary Bennet and the Bloomsbury Coven. Charleston, SC: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, Helen. 1997. Bridget Jones’s Diary. London: Picador/Pan Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, Terri. 2017. Perception. London: Orion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaiman, N. 2006. Coraline. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraghty, Christine. 2008. Now a Major Motion Picture: Adaptations of Literature and Drama. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeme-Smith, Seth, and Jane Austen. 2009. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. Philadelphia: Quirk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockensmith, Steve. 2010. Dawn of the Dreadfuls. Philadelphia: Quirk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Dreadfully Ever After. Philadelphia, PA: Quirk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guin, Ursula. 2016. ‘It Was Badly Done’ – To Quote Mr Knightley – An Ill-Judged Rendering of Jane Austen’s Most Famous Work. Guardian, April 22. www.guardian.com.

  • Lewis, C.S. 1979. A Note on Jane Austen. In Selected Literary Essays, ed. Walter Hooper, 175–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizzie Bennet Diaries. Created by Hank Green and Bernie Su. Perf. Ashley Clements, Mary Kate Wiles, Laura Spencer, Julia Cho and Daniel Vincent Gordh, Digital Pemberley, 2012. Webseries. http://www.pemberleydigital.com/the-lizzie-bennet-diaries/

  • Lost in Austen. Writ. Guy Andrews, Dir. Dan Zeff, Perf. Jemima Rooper, Elliot Cowan, ITV, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyall, Sarah. 2016. Eligible, Curtis Sittenfeld’s Update of Jane Austen. New York Times, April 25. www.nytimes.com.

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough. 2008. The Independence of Miss Mary Bennet. New York: Pocket Books/Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingle, Pamela. 2013. The Pursuit of Mary Bennet. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moers, Ellen. 1976. Female Gothic. In Literary Women, 90–130. New York: Double Day. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, Jennifer. 2014. The Forgotten Sister. Seattle: Lake Union Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, Mary. 1984. The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Words of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pride and Prejudice. Screenplay by Aldous Huxley, Helen Jerome and Jane Mur n. Dir. Robert Z. Leonard. Perf. Laurence Olivier and Greer Garson. Metro Goldwyn Mayer, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Dir. Simon Langton, Writ. Andrew Davies, Perf. Jennifer Ehle, Colin Firth, BBC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarath, Patrice. 2011. The Unexpected Miss Mary Bennet. London: The Crowood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sittenfeld, Curtis. 2016. Eligible. London: Borough Press/HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Anthea. 2012. Single Women in Popular Culture: The Limits of Post Feminism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valihora, Karen. 2010. Austen’s Oughts: Judgment after Locke and Shaftesbury. Delaware: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelehan, Imelda. 2005. The Feminist Bestseller. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, Susan. 2012. Re-reading Pride and Prejudice: “What Think You of Books?”. In A Companion to Jane Austen, ed. Claudia Johnson and Clara Tuite, 112–122. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilla Nelson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nelson, C. (2018). The Trouble with Mary: Curtis Sittenfeld’s Eligible and the Single Woman. In: Hopkins, L. (eds) After Austen. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95894-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics