Skip to main content

Assessment Policy and “Pockets of Freedom” in a Neoliberal University: A Foucauldian Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resisting Neoliberalism in Higher Education Volume II

Part of the book series: Palgrave Critical University Studies ((PCU))

Abstract

Guided by a Foucauldian theorisation, this chapter conducts a discourse analysis of assessment policy documents in one neoliberalised UK university. Furthermore, it traces the ways in which academics and graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) as assessors negotiate this policy space. The findings demonstrate that the assessment policy has become increasingly restrictive but also ambiguous in the university. It includes a high number of policy documents, a wide range of assessment stakeholders and increasingly abstract language of instruction. However, the findings also suggest that this policy ambiguity is not utterly negative but can be exploited by academics and GTAs, allowing them to have some ownership over assessment processes and their own subjectivities as assessors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Russell Group includes 24 “research-intensive” universities from the UK. More information is available at: http://www.russellgroup.ac.uk/

  2. 2.

    Michel Foucault, “The Subject and Power,” in Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, ed. J. D. Faubion (London: Penguin Group, 1982), 331.

  3. 3.

    Mark Olssen and Michael A. Peters, “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: from the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism,” Journal of Education Policy 20, 30 (2005): 47.

  4. 4.

    Kathleen Lynch, “Neo-liberalism and Marketisation: The Implications for Higher Education,” European Educational Research Journal 5, 1 (2006).

  5. 5.

    Natasha Jankowski and Staci Provezis, “Neoliberal Ideologies, Governmentality and the Academy: An Examination of Accountability through Assessment and Transparency,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 46, 5 (2014): 477.

  6. 6.

    Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979 (New York: Picador USA, 2004).

  7. 7.

    Trent H. Hamann, “Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics,” Foucault Studies 6 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Rohit Chopra, “Neoliberalism as Doxa: Bourdieu’s Theory of the State and the Contemporary Indian Discourse on Globalization and Liberalization,” Cultural Studies 17 (2003): 432.

  9. 9.

    Olssen and Peters, “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy”.

  10. 10.

    Rille Raaper, “Academic Perceptions of Higher Education Assessment Processes in Neoliberal Academia,” Critical Studies in Education 57, 2 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Sue Clegg and Karen Smith, “Learning, Teaching and Assessment Strategies in Higher Education: Contradictions of Genre and Desiring,” Research Papers in Education 25, 1 (2010).

  12. 12.

    David Boud and Elizabeth Molloy, “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38, 6 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Lynn Clouder and Christina Hughes, “Introduction,” in Improving Student Engagement and Development through Assessment. Theory and Practice in Higher Education, edited by L. Clouder, C. Broughan, S. Jewell, and H. Steventon (Oxon: Routledge, 2012).

  14. 14.

    Linda Hammersley-Fletcher and Anne Qualter, “From Schools to Higher Education – Neoliberal Agendas and Implications for Autonomy,” Journal of Educational Administration and History 41, 4 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Rille Raaper, “Tracing Assessment Policy Discourses in Neoliberalised Higher Education Settings,” Journal of Education Policy 32, 3 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Raw Rhodes, “The Hollowing Out of the State: the Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain,” The Political Quarterly 65, 2 (1994).

  17. 17.

    Stephen J. Ball, The Education Debate (Bristol: The Polity Press, 2008). Stephen J. Ball, “What is Policy? 21 Years Later: Reflections on the Possibilities of Policy Research,” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36, 3 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Ball, “What is Policy?,” 308.

  19. 19.

    Foucault, “The Subject and Power”. Michel Foucault, “Technologies of the self,” in Ethics. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow (London: Penguin Group, 1982).

  20. 20.

    Sine Lehn-Christiansen, “Health Promotion Viewed as Processes of Subjectification in the Education of Danish Social and Healthcare Workers,” Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community 25, 3 (2009).

  21. 21.

    Judith Butler, The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997).

  22. 22.

    Tina Besley and Michael A. Peters, Subjectivity and Truth. Foucault, Education and the Culture of Self (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2007).

  23. 23.

    Foucault, “The Subject and Power,” 331.

  24. 24.

    Butler, The Psychic Life of Power, 2.

  25. 25.

    Fiona Patrick, “Neoliberalism, the Knowledge Economy, and the Learner: Challenging the Inevitability of the Commodified Self as an Outcome of Education,” ISRN Education (2013).

  26. 26.

    Foucault, “Technologies of the self”.

  27. 27.

    Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics.

  28. 28.

    Hamann, “Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics,” 53.

  29. 29.

    Foucault, “Technologies of the self,” 225.

  30. 30.

    Geoff Danaher, Tony Schirato and Jenn Webb, Understanding Foucault (London: Sage Publications, 2000), 128.

  31. 31.

    Danaher, Schirato and Webb, Understanding Foucault. Gail McNicol Jardine, Foucault and Education (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2005).

  32. 32.

    Michel Foucault, “History, Discourse and Discontinuity,” Salmagundi 20 (1972): 232.

  33. 33.

    Lehn-Christiansen, “Health Promotion Viewed as Processes of Subjectification”.

  34. 34.

    Margaret Walshaw, Working with Foucault in education (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2007).

  35. 35.

    Norman Fairclough, Discourse and Social Change (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992). Norman Fairclough, Language and Power (Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2001).

  36. 36.

    The title “university teacher” refers to an academic position that mainly involves teaching and potentially pedagogic research.

  37. 37.

    Norman Fairclough, Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research (London: Routledge, 2003).

  38. 38.

    Fairclough, Analysing Discourse, 35.

  39. 39.

    Norman Fairclough, “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities,” Discourse & Society 4, 2 (1993).

  40. 40.

    Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics.

  41. 41.

    Michel Foucault, “Subjectivity and Truth,” in The Politics of Truth, edited by S. Lotringer (Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 1993).

  42. 42.

    Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison (London: Penguin Group, 1975).

  43. 43.

    Bronwyn Davies and Peter Bansel, “Governmentality and Academic Work. Shaping the Hearts and Minds of Academic Workers,” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 26, 3 (2010): 9.

  44. 44.

    Jankowski and Provezis, “Neoliberal Ideologies, Governmentality and the Academy”.

  45. 45.

    Rajani Naidoo and Joanna Williams, “The Neoliberal Regime in English Higher Education: Charters, Consumers and the Erosion of the Public Good,” Critical Studies in Education 56, 2 (2015): 213.

  46. 46.

    Raaper, “Tracing Assessment Policy Discourses”.

  47. 47.

    Eivind Engebretsen, Kristin Heggen and Heidi A. Eilertsen, “Accreditation and Power: A Discourse Analysis of a New Regime of Governance in Higher Education,” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 56, 4 (2012).

  48. 48.

    Royce D. Sadler, “Academic Freedom, Achievement Standards and Professional Identity,” Quality in Higher Education 17, 1 (2011).

  49. 49.

    Olssen and Peters, “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy”.

  50. 50.

    Stephen Hay and Cushla Kapitzke, “‘Smart State’ for a Knowledge Economy: Reconstituting Creativity through Student Subjectivity,” British Journal of Sociology of Education 30, 2 (2009): 153.

  51. 51.

    Joelle Fanghanel, Being an Academic (London: Routledge, 2012): 15.

  52. 52.

    Engebretsen, Heggen and Eilertsen, “Accreditation and Power”. Leslie D. Gonzales, E. Martinez and C. Ordu, “Exploring Faculty Experiences in a Striving University through the Lens of Academic Capitalism,” Studies in Higher Education 39, 7 (2013).

  53. 53.

    Michel Foucault, “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom,” in Ethics. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow (London: Penguin Group, 1984).

  54. 54.

    Foucault, “Technologies of the Self”.

  55. 55.

    Michel Foucault, “The Risks of Security,” in Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by J. D. Faubion (London: Penguin Group 1983), 372.

  56. 56.

    Deesha Chadha, “Reconceptualising and Reframing Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) Provision for a Research-Intensive Institution,” Teaching in Higher Education 18, 2 (2013). Chris Park, “Neither Fish nor Fowl? The Perceived Benefits and Problems of Using Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) to Teach Undergraduate Students,” Higher Education Review 35, 1 (2002).

  57. 57.

    Mitchell Dean, The Signature of Power. Sovereignty, Governmentality and Biopolitics (London: Sage Publications, 2013): 63.

  58. 58.

    Foucault, “Technologies of the Self”. Foucault, “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom”.

  59. 59.

    Olssen and Peters, “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy”.

  60. 60.

    Foucault, “The Risks of Security”.

  61. 61.

    Foucault, “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom”.

  62. 62.

    Foucault, “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom,” 286.

Bibliography

  • Ball, Stephen J. The Education Debate. Bristol: The Polity Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Stephen J. “What is Policy? 21 Years Later: Reflections on the Possibilities of Policy Research.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36, 3 (2015): 306–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, Tina, and Michael A. Peters. Subjectivity and Truth. Foucault, Education and the Culture of Self. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, David, and Elizabeth Molloy. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38, 6 (2013): 698–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chadha, Deesha. “Reconceptualising and Reframing Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) Provision for a Research-Intensive Institution.” Teaching in Higher Education 18, 2 (2013): 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, Rohit. “Neoliberalism as Doxa: Bourdieu’s Theory of the State and the Contemporary Indian Discourse on Globalization and Liberalization.” Cultural Studies 17 (2003): 419–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg Sue, and Karen Smith. “Learning, Teaching and Assessment Strategies in Higher Education: Contradictions of Genre and Desiring.” Research Papers in Education 25, 1 (2010): 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn Clouder, and Christina Hughes. “Introduction,” in Improving Student Engagement and Development through Assessment. Theory and Practice in Higher Education, edited by L. Clouder, C. Broughan, S. Jewell, and H. Steventon, 1–3. Oxon: Routledge, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Geoff, Schirato, Tony, and Jenn Webb. Understanding Foucault. London: Sage Publications, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Bronwyn, and Peter Bansel. “Governmentality and Academic Work. Shaping the Hearts and Minds of Academic Workers.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 26, 3 (2010): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Mitchell. The Signature of Power. Sovereignty, Governmentality and Biopolitics. London: Sage Publications, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engebretsen, Eivind, Heggen, Kirstin, and Heidi A. Eilertsen. “Accreditation and Power: A Discourse Analysis of a New Regime of Governance in Higher Education.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 56, 4 (2012): 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.” Discourse & Society 4, 2 (1993): 133–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. Language and Power. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fanghanel, Joelle. Being an Academic. London: Routledge, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Group, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. “History, Discourse and Discontinuity.” Salmagundi 20 (1972): 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. “The Subject and Power.” In Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by J. D. Faubion, 326–348. London: Penguin Group, 1982a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. “Technologies of the Self.” In Ethics. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow, 223–251. London: Penguin Group, 1982b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. “The Risks of Security.” In Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by J. D. Faubion, 365–381. London: Penguin Group, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In Ethics. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow, 281–301. London: Penguin Group, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. “Subjectivity and Truth.” In The Politics of Truth, edited by S. Lotringer, 147–167. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. New York: Picador USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, Leslie D., Martinez, E., and C. Ordu. “Exploring Faculty Experiences in a Striving University through the Lens of Academic Capitalism.” Studies in Higher Education 39,7 (2013): 1097–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, Trent H. “Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics.” Foucault Studies 6 (2009): 37–59. Accessed June 11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.2471.

  • Hammersley-Fletcher, Linda, and Anne Qualter, “From Schools to Higher Education – Neoliberal Agendas and Implications for Autonomy.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 41, 4 (2009): 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Stephen, and Cushla Kapitzke. “‘Smart State’ for a Knowledge Economy: Reconstituting Creativity through Student Subjectivity.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 30, 2 (2009): 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, Natasha, and Staci Provezis. “Neoliberal Ideologies, Governmentality and the Academy: An Examination of Accountability through Assessment and Transparency.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 46, 5 (2014): 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehn-Christiansen, Sine. “Health Promotion Viewed as Processes of Subjectification in the Education of Danish Social and Healthcare Workers.” Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community 25, 3 (2009): 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Kathleen. “Neo-liberalism and Marketisation: The Implications for Higher Education.” European Educational Research Journal 5, 1 (2006): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNicol Jardine, Gail. Foucault and Education. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, Rajani, and Joanna Williams. “The Neoliberal Regime in English Higher Education: Charters, Consumers and the Erosion of the Public Good.” Critical Studies in Education 56, 2 (2015): 108–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, Mark, and Michael A. Peters. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: from the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 20, 3 (2005): 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Chris. “Neither Fish nor Fowl? The Perceived Benefits and Problems of Using Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) to Teach Undergraduate Students.” Higher Education Review 35, 1 (2002): 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, Fiona. “Neoliberalism, the Knowledge Economy, and the Learner: Challenging the Inevitability of the Commodified Self as an Outcome of Education.” ISRN Education (2013): 1–8. Accessed June 11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/108705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raaper, Rille. “Academic Perceptions of Higher Education Assessment Processes in Neoliberal Academia,” Critical Studies in Education 57, 2 (2016): 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raaper, Rille. “Tracing Assessment Policy Discourses in Neoliberalised Higher Education Settings,” Journal of Education Policy 32, 3 (2017): 322–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, Raw. “The Hollowing Out of the State: the Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain.” The Political Quarterly 65, 2 (1994): 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, Royce D. “Academic Freedom, Achievement Standards and Professional Identity.” Quality in Higher Education 17, 1 (2011): 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walshaw, Margaret. Working with Foucault in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rille Raaper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Raaper, R. (2019). Assessment Policy and “Pockets of Freedom” in a Neoliberal University: A Foucauldian Perspective. In: Manathunga, C., Bottrell, D. (eds) Resisting Neoliberalism in Higher Education Volume II. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95834-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95834-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95833-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95834-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics