Advertisement

Designing Breadth-Oriented Data Exploration for Mitigating Cognitive Biases

  • Po-Ming LawEmail author
  • Rahul C. Basole
Chapter

Abstract

Exploratory data analysis involves making a series of complex decisions: what should I explore? what questions should I ask? As users do not have good knowledge about the data they are exploring, making these decisions is non-trivial. In making these decisions, heuristics are often applied, potentially causing a biased exploration path. While breadth-oriented data exploration presents a promising solution to rectifying a biased exploration path, how to design such systems is yet to be explored. In this Chapter, we propose three considerations in designing systems that support breadth-oriented data exploration. To demonstrate the utility of these design considerations, we describe a hypothetical breadth-oriented system. We argue that these design considerations pave the way for understanding how breadth-oriented exploration mitigates biases in exploratory data analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Chau DH, Kittur A, Hong JI, Faloutsos C (2011) Apolo: making sense of large network data by combining rich user interaction and machine learning. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 167–176Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dheeru D, Karra Taniskidou E (2017) UCI machine learning repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/auto+mpg
  3. 3.
    Gotz D, Sun S, Cao N (2016) Adaptive contextualization: combating bias during high-dimensional visualization and data selection. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on intelligent user interfaces, ACM, pp 85–95Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kairam S, Riche NH, Drucker S, Fernandez R, Heer J (2015) Refinery: visual exploration of large, heterogeneous networks through associative browsing. Comput Graphics Forum, Wiley Online Library 34:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psych 2(2):175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’malley AJ, Arbesman S, Steiger DM, Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2012) Egocentric social network structure, health, and pro-social behaviors in a national panel study of americans. PLoS One 7(5):e36,250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perer A, Shneiderman B (2008) Systematic yet flexible discovery: Guiding domain experts through exploratory data analysis. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, ACM, pp 109–118Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sarvghad A, Tory M, Mahyar N (2017) Visualizing dimension coverage to support exploratory analysis. IEEE Trans Visualization Comput Graphics 23(1):21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Toms EG (2002) Information interaction: providing a framework for information architecture. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 53(10):855–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5(2):207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Ham F, Perer A (2009) ?search, show context, expand on demand?: Supporting large graph exploration with degree-of-interest. IEEE Trans Visualization Comput Graphics 15(6)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Willett W, Heer J, Agrawala M (2007) Scented widgets: improving navigation cues with embedded visualizations. IEEE Trans Visualization Comput Graphics 13(6):1129–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wongsuphasawat K, Moritz D, Anand A, Mackinlay J, Howe B, Heer J (2016) Voyager: exploratory analysis via faceted browsing of visualization recommendations. IEEE Trans Visualization Comput Graphics 22(1):649–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations