Skip to main content

Germany’s “Ordinary Monsters” and the Holocaust

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Willing Participants, Volume 1
  • 1053 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, Russell provides the reader with a brief overview of the Holocaust, the Obedience studies, and the contentious relationship they share—the so-called Milgram-Holocaust linkage. This chapter also explores some of the more important literature that is associated with or has grown out of this relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, M. T. (2005). Introduction: A bureaucratic Holocaust—toward a new consensus. In G. D. Feldman & W. Seibel (Eds.), Networks of Nazi persecution: Bureaucracy, business, and the organization of the Holocaust (pp. 259–268). New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschheim, S. E. (1996). Reconceiving the Holocaust? Tikkun, 11(4), 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankier, D. (1992). The Germans and the final solution: Public opinion under Nazism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartov, O. (1996). Ordinary monsters. The New Republic, 214(18), 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Y. (2001). Rethinking the Holocaust. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass, T. (1993). Psychological perspectives on the perpetrators of the Holocaust: The role of situational pressures, personal dispositions, and their interactions. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 7(1), 30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blass, T. (1998). The roots of Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiments and their relevance to the Holocaust. Analyse & Kritik, 20(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, D., & Kushner, T. (2005). The Holocaust: Critical historical approaches. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C. R. (1992). Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C. R. (1998). Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C. R. (2004). The origins of the final solution: The evolution of Nazi Jewish policy, September 1939–March 1942. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charny, I. W. (1982). How can we commit the unthinkable? Genocide, the human cancer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Swaan, A. (2015). The killing compartments: The mentality of mass murder. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, N. G. (1997). Daniel Goldhagen’s crazy thesis, a critique of Hitler’s Willing Executioners. New Left Review, 224(1), 39–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, N. G., & Birn, R. B. (1998). A nation on trial: The Goldhagen thesis and historical truth. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhagen, D. J. (1996a). Hitler’s willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. London: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhagen, D. J. (1996b). Motives, causes, and alibis: A reply to my critics. The New Republic, 215(26), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberg, R. (1961a). The destruction of the European Jews. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberg, R. (1961b). The destruction of the European Jews (Vols. 1–3). New York: Holmes & Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberg, R. (1980a). The significance of the Holocaust. In H. Friedlander & S. Milton (Eds.), The Holocaust: Ideology, bureaucracy, and genocide (the San José Papers) (pp. 95–102). Millwood, NY: Kraus International Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberg, R. (1980b). The nature of the process. In J. E. Dimsdale (Ed.), Survivors, victims, and perpetrators: Essays on the Nazi Holocaust (pp. 5–54). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberg, R. (1997). The Goldhagen phenomenon. Critical Inquiry, 23(4), 721–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höss, R. (2001). Commandant of Auschwitz: The autobiography of Rudolf Hoess. London: Phoenix Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, I. (1983). Popular opinion and political dissent in the Third Reich: Bavaria 1933–1945. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langerbein, H. (2004). Hitler’s death squads: The logic of mass murder. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, P. (1988). The drowned and the saved. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. G. (1986). The obedience experiments: A case study of controversy in social science. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, B. (1966). Auschwitz. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, D. (1997). Nationalsozialistische Judenverfolgung in Ostgalizien 1941–1944: Organisation und Durchführung eines staatlichen Massenverbrechens. Munich: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, R. (1978). The cunning of history: The Holocaust and the American future. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, N. J. C., & Gregory, R. J. (2005). Making the undoable doable: Milgram, the Holocaust and modern government. American Review of Public Administration, 35(4), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabini, J., & Silver, M. (1982). Moralities of everyday life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, F. (1996). The Goldhagen controversy: One nation, one people, one theory. Foreign Affairs, 75(6), 128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2010). Histories of the Holocaust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traverso, E. (1999). Understanding the Nazi genocide: Marxism after Auschwitz. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheler, H. (1998). Like a thorn in the flesh. In R. R. Shandley (Ed.), Unwilling Germans? The Goldhagen debate (pp. 93–104). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nestar Russell .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Russell, N. (2018). Germany’s “Ordinary Monsters” and the Holocaust. In: Understanding Willing Participants, Volume 1. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95816-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics