Abstract
In the conclusions we come back to the metaphor of ‘Achilles’ heel’. We argue that CPD can tell us a lot about what is happening behind the scene of an ‘education superpower’ like Finland, and open doors to aspects of international comparative education which are not always easy to access. The conclusion summarizes what we found; proposes a concluding figure which presents the organization and funding of CPD in Finland and offers recommendations for different actors involved in CPD. These recommendations are of interest to a global audience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aspfors, J. (2012). Induction practices: Experiences of newly qualified teachers. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.
Cai, Y., & Kivisto, J. (2010). Towards a fee-based education in Finland: Where to go? IMHE General Conference, Paris, France.
Craft, A. (1996). Continuing professional development. A practical guide for teachers and schools. London: Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Recognizing and enhancing teacher effectiveness. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 3, 1–24.
Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. W. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching.
Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability. System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental study of teacher concerns across time. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
Geeraerts, K., Tynjälä, P., Heikkinen, H. L., Markkanen, I., Pennanen, M., & Gijbels, D. (2015). Peer-group mentoring as a tool for teacher development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 358–377.
Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 129–139.
Grahn-Laasonen, S. (2018). Government’s question time in parliament: Equality in education. 28 February 2018. Available in Finnish at http://minedu.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/hallituksen-vastaus-valikysymykseen-koulutuksen-tasa-arvosta-28-2-2018.
Guiden, V., & Brennan, M. (2017). The continuous professional development (CPD) of Finnish primary school teachers—Potential lessons to be learned for Ireland. Irish Teachers’ Journal, 5(1), 39–54.
Hämäläinen, K., & Hämäläinen, K. (2011). Professional development for education personnel as a competence resource. A report on good practices and development measures in professional development for education personnel. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.
Hämäläinen, K., & Kangasniemi, J. (2013). Systemaattista suunnitelmallisuutta [Systematic planning]. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.
Hämäläinen, K., Hämäläinen, K., & Kangasniemi, J. (2015). Osaamisen kehittämisen poluille: Valtion rahoittaman opetustoimen henkilöstökoulutuksen haasteet ja tulevaisuus [Knowledge development direction: A state funded education in-service training, challenges and future]. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.
Heikkinen, H., Hästö, P., Kangas, V., & Leinonen, M. (2015). Promoting exploratory teaching in mathematics: A design experiment on a CPD course for teachers. LUMAT (2013–2015 Issues), 3(6), 905–924.
Helin, M. (2014). Opettajien ammatillisen kehittymisen jatkumo: yliopiston ja koulujen kumppanuus [Teachers’ professional development as a continuum—Educational partnership between the university and schools]. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
Holliday, A. (2010). Intercultural communication and ideology. London: Sage.
Huber, S. G. (2012). The impact of professional development: A theoretical model for empirical research, evaluation, planning and conducting training and development programmes. Professional Development in Education, 37(5), 837–853.
Huhtala, A., & Vesalainen, M. (2017). Challenges in developing in-service teacher training: Lessons learnt from two projects for teachers of Swedish in Finland. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 11, 55–79.
Li, L., & Chen, S. (2013). In-service training of primary and secondary teachers in Finland. Contemporary educational science, 8, 45–48.
Li, Y., & Dervin, F. (2018). Education systems and social justice: Comparing and contrasting in China and Finland. London: Routledge.
Liu, X., & Zhang, W. (2017). Possible paths for teacher professional development—Based on the comparative analysis of TALIS 2013 Shanghai and Finland. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 9, 1–8.
Niemi, H. (2015). Teacher professional development in Finland: Towards a more holistic approach. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 279–294.
Niemi, H., Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (Eds.). (2012). Miracle of education. London: Sense Publishers.
OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2011). Strong performers and successful reformers in education lessons from PISA for the USA. Paris: OECD Publications.
OECD. (2013). Teachers’ professional development Europe in international comparison. Paris: OECD.
Perez, L., Uline, C., Johnson, J., James-Ward, C., & Basom, M. (2007). Foregrounding fieldwork in leadership preparation: The transformative capacity of authentic inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 217–257.
Pöntynen, L., & Silander, T. (2015). Opettajat koulutuksessa—nappikaupasta rohkeisiin ratkaisuihin [Teachers in training—The most daring solutions]. Available at https://www.sitra.fi/blogit/opettajat-koulutuksessa-nappikaupasta-rohkeisiin-ratkaisuihin/.
Sahlberg, P. (2018, January 3). Teachers need a sense of mission, empathy and leadership. The Conversation (Z. Zhuoying). Available at https://www.jiemodui.com/N/90187.
Schatz, M., Popovic, A., & Dervin, F. (2015). From PISA to national branding: exploring Finnish education®. Discourse: Studies In The Cultural Politics Of Education, 38(2), 172–184.
Simola, H., Kauko, J., Varjo, J., Kalalahti, M., & Sahlstrom, F. (2017). Dynamics in education politics: Understanding and explaining the Finnish case. London: Routledge.
Sitra. (2015). https://www.sitra.fi/en/news/finnish-education-based-meeting-yesterdays-standards/.
Stoll, L., Harris, A., & Handscomb, G. (2012). Great professional development which leads to great pedagogy: Nine claims from research. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
Weiss, I., & Pasley. J. (2006). Scaling up instructional improvement through teacher professional development: Insights from the local systemic change initiative. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE) Policy Briefs.
Xing, X., Dervin, F., & Fan, P. (2017). Truths, omissions and illusions in the era of Marketization Chinese university leaders’ perceptions of Finnish education. Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 4, 33–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, Y., Dervin, F. (2018). Conclusions. In: Continuing Professional Development of Teachers in Finland. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95795-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95795-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95794-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95795-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)