Advertisement

Framing CPD to Understand and Explore the Finnish Context

  • Yongjian LiEmail author
  • Fred Dervin
Chapter
  • 356 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter serves the purpose of framing Continuing Professional Development (CPD) to understand and explore the Finnish context. This is used as a conceptual and theoretical chapter for the rest of the book. We start by problematizing CPD as a polysemic idea, reviewing international research. We are critical of the fact that most of the literature on CPD is Westerncentric and add what we consider to be interesting dimensions from China. The second section is about the importance of long-term reflexivity in CPD. This is followed by a review of current research on CPD worldwide. The ‘natural’ links between initial teacher education and CPD are noted.

References

  1. Aspfors, J. (2012). Induction practices: Experiences of newly qualified teachers. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bausmith, J. M., & Barry, C. (2011). Revisiting professional learning communities to increase college readiness: The importance of pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 40(4), 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burden, P. R. (1982). Implications of teacher career development: New roles for teachers, administrators and professors. Paper presented at the National Summer Workshop of the Association of Teacher Educators, Slippery Rock, P. A.Google Scholar
  5. Calderhead, J. (1992). The role of reflection in learning to teach. In L. Valli (Ed.), Reflective teacher education: Cases and critiques (pp. 139–146). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Craft, A. (1996). Continuing professional development: A Practical guide for teachers and schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Recognizing and enhancing teacher effectiveness. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 3, 1–24.Google Scholar
  8. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. W. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.Google Scholar
  9. Dubble, S. L. (1998). Evolving people/evolving schools. Paper presented at the North American Montessori Teachers’ Association Conference, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  10. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching.Google Scholar
  11. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability. System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental study of teacher concerns across time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Geeraerts, K., Tynjälä, P., Heikkinen, H. L., Markkanen, I., Pennanen, M., & Gijbels, D. (2015). Peer-group mentoring as a tool for teacher development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guiden, V., & Brennan, M. (2017). The continuous professional development (CPD) of Finnish primary school teachers—Potential lessons to be learned for Ireland. Irish Teachers’ Journal, 5(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
  16. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hämäläinen, K., & Hämäläinen, K. (2011). Professional development for education personnel as a competence resource. A report on good practices and development measures in professional development for education personnel. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.Google Scholar
  18. Heikkinen, H. L. T., Aho, J., & Korhonen, H. (2015). Ope ei saa oppia. Opettajankoulutuksen jatkumon kehittäminen [The teacher does not know how to teach. Development of teacher education]. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos.Google Scholar
  19. Helin, M. (2014). Opettajien ammatillisen kehittymisen jatkumo: yliopiston ja koulujen kumppanuus [Teachers’ professional development as a continuum—Educational partnership between the university and schools]. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Huber, S. G. (2012). The impact of professional development: A theoretical model for empirical research, evaluation, planning and conducting training and development programmes. Professional Development in Education, 37(5), 837–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huhtala, A., & Vesalainen, M. (2017). Challenges in developing in-service teacher training: Lessons learnt from two projects for teachers of Swedish in Finland. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 11(3), 55–79.Google Scholar
  22. Jokinen, H., Heikkinen, H., & Valijervi, J. (2005, October). Mentoring in supporting newly qualified teachers’ professional development. ATEE 30e annual conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands (pp. 219–222).Google Scholar
  23. Kangasoja. (2017). Good practices from the Osaava programme; Operating models for developing the competence of personnel in education and the opportunities provided by these models. Programme report in Finnish for the Ministry of Education. Helsinki: MoE.Google Scholar
  24. Katz, L. G. (1972). Developmental stages of preschool teachers. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Early Childhood Education.Google Scholar
  25. Korkeakoski, E. (Ed.) (1999). Opettajien täydennyskoulutuksen tuloksellisuus [Benefits of teacher professional development]. Arviointi, 3. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.Google Scholar
  26. Lehtola, K., & Wilen, L. (2010). Täydennyskoulutus auttaa jaksamaan ja antaa uutta tietoa – opetushenkilökunnan arviointeja täydennyskoulutuksesta Itä-Suomen aluehallintoviraston alueella [Professional development helps to be motivated and to receive new information—Teaching staff evaluation of professional development in Southern Finland]. Tutkimusraportti: “Täydennyskoulutuksen vaikuttavuus”.Google Scholar
  27. Li, L., & Chen, S. (2013). In-service training of primary and secondary teachers in Finland and Inspiration. Contemporary Educational Science, 8, 45–48.Google Scholar
  28. Liu, H., & Dervin, F. (2016). ‘Education is a life marathon rather than a hundred-meter race’: Chinese ‘folk’ comparative discourses on Finnish education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(4), 529–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, X., & Zhang, W. (2017). Possible paths for teacher professional development—Based on the comparative analysis of TALIS 2013 Shanghai and Finland. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 9, 1–8.Google Scholar
  30. Niemi, H. (2015). Teacher professional development in Finland: Towards a more holistic approach. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  32. Perez, L., Uline, C., Johnson, J., James-Ward, C., & Basom, M. (2007). Foregrounding fieldwork in leadership preparation: The transformative capacity of authentic inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 217–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schollaert, R. (2011). Continuing professional development for the 21st century: Setting the scene for teacher induction in a new era. In P. Picard & L. Ria (Eds.), Beginning teachers: A challenge for educational systems—CIDREE yearbook (pp. 9–28). Lyon: ENS de Lyon, Institut français de l’Éducation.Google Scholar
  34. Shepel, E. N. L. (1995). Teacher self-identification in culture from Vygotsky’s developmental perspective. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(4), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Song, B. (2013). ‘Pre-service’ and ‘In-service’ training of teacher education in Finland. Modern Teaching, 3, 70–72.Google Scholar
  36. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 237–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stoll, L., Harris, A., & Handscomb, G. (2012). Great professional development which leads to great pedagogy: Nine claims from research. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  38. Supovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, L. (2005). An analysis of in-service training models for foreign bilingual teachers—Case studies from the United States, Canada and Finland. Exploring Education Development, 21, 78–81.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, B. (2013). ITT: In service training for Finnish teacher project—Physics teachers as an example. Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad, 5, 37–41.Google Scholar
  42. Watts, H. (1980). Starting out, moving on, running ahead or how the teachers’ center can attend to stages in teachers’ development. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  43. Weiss, I., & Pasley. J. (2006). Scaling up instructional improvement through teacher professional development: Insights from the local systemic change initiative. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE) Policy Briefs.Google Scholar
  44. Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Teacher EducationUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations