Skip to main content

Use of the Shear Box Compactor for Porous Asphalt Mix Property Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Solving Pavement and Construction Materials Problems with Innovative and Cutting-edge Technologies (GeoChina 2018)

Abstract

The most commonly used compaction methodologies for specimen preparation for the assessment of porous asphalt (PA) mix properties are gyratory and Marshall. Even though several individual blocks prepared by one of these test methods are usually considered to be replicates, the heating and handling histories are never identical as these are individual specimens prepared at different times. In contrast, the Shear Box Compaction (SBC) technique allows fabrication of a single slab, at a given time, which is then used to extract multiple specimens that can be considered as true replicates. The SBC can offer significant advantages in preparation of PA specimens for various tests typically performed on gyratory or Marshall specimens. The recently released ASTM D7981-15 test method on SBC of asphalt mixes is written around compaction of dense-graded (DG) mixes, not PA mixes, even though the specific mix type is not stated in the test method. Furthermore, there is a very limited literature on the SBC, with most of the published work focusing on DG mixes. This paper aims to address this gap. In this study, the SBC was used for PA mix compaction with a nominal maximum aggregate size of 10 mm using two different types on aggregates and four bituminous binders. Slab preparation and specimen extraction methodology developed were discussed in details. Variation of the air voids (AV) between the replicate specimens extracted from one slab were within ±0.5% from the average AV value regardless of the aggregate or binder type, or slab height. The total variation of AV in all the 64 extracted specimens tested was 1.9%. This gives the confidence that performance testing such as Dynamic Modulus testing, which requires very stringent control of specimen dimensions, uniformity, and AV consistency among the replicate specimens, can be performed reliably on PA. Also, some recommendations were provided on the changes needed in the ASTM D7981 for PA compaction using SBC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AASHTO: AASHTO PP 60-09: Standard Practice for Preparation of Cylindrical Performance Test Specimens Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC). AASHTO, Washington, DC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • AASHTO: AASHTO TP 79-13: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number for Asphalt Mixtures Using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT). American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, Washington, DC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM International: ASTM D3203/D3203M-11: Standard Test Method for Percent Air Voids in Compacted Dense and Open Bituminous Paving Mixtures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2011a). https://doi.org/10.1520/D3203_D3203M-11

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM International: ASTM D7227/D7227M-11: Standard Practice for Rapid Drying of Compacted Asphalt Specimens Using Vacuum Drying Apparatus. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2011b). https://doi.org/10.1520/D7227_D7227M-11

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM International: ASTM D7981-15: Standard Practice for Compaction of Prismatic Asphalt Specimens by Means of the Shear Box Compactor. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1520/D7981-15

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, L.A., Brumfield, J.W., Mallick, R.B., Mogawer, W.S., Partl, M., Poulikakos, L., Hicks, G.: Construction and maintenance practices for permeable friction courses. NCHRP Report 640, TRB (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrawy, T.: Towards laboratory replication of field compaction: the asphalt shear box compactor. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference World of Asphalt Pavements, Sydney, Australia, 20–24 Feb 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, S.W., You, Z.: Mechanical properties of porous asphalt pavement materials with warm mix asphalt and RAP. J. Transp. Eng. 138(1), 90–97 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamzah, M.O., Hasan, M.R.M., Van De Ven, M., Yahaya, A.S.: The effects of initial conditioning and ambient temperatures on abrasion loss and temperature change of porous asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 29, 108–113 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holleran, G., Holleran, I., Bearsley, S., Dubois, C.J., Wilson, D.: Epoxy asphalt for durability of open graded mixes: part 1 performance approaches. In: 17th AAPA International Flexible Pavements Conference, Australian Asphalt Paving Association, Melbourne, 13–16 Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandhal, P.S.: Design, Construction, and Maintenance of Open-Graded Asphalt Friction Courses. Asphalt Institute, National Asphalt Pavement Association (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, A.A.A., van de Ven, M.F.C., Rickards, I.: Laboratory compaction of asphalt samples using the shear box compactor. In: 13th AAPA International Flexible Pavements Conference, Australian Asphalt Paving Association, Queensland, Australia, 11–14 Oct 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • NZ Transport Agency: TNZ P/23:2005 Performance Based Specification for Hotmix Asphalt Wearing Course Surfacing. NZ Transport Agency, New Zealand (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • NZ Transport Agency: TNZ P/11:2007 Specification for Open Graded Porous Asphalt. NZ Transport Agency, New Zealand (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • NZ Transport Agency: NZTA M1-A: 2016 Performance Specification for Asphalt Binders. NZ Transport Agency, New Zealand (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Priyadharshini, R.Y., Krishnan, J.M.: How workable are modified binder mixtures? A comparative study with gyratory and shear compactor. In: Colloquium on Transportation Systems Engineering and Management, CTR, CED, NIT Calicut, India, 12–13 May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J., Li, N., Pramesti, F.P., Van De Ven, M.F.C., Molenaar, A.A.A.: Evaluating laboratory compaction of asphalt mixtures using the shear box compactor. J. Test. Eval. 40(5) (2012). https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20120070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia: AS 2891.2.2-1995. Methods of Sampling and Testing Asphalt. Method 2.2: Sample Preparation—Compaction of Asphalt Test Specimens Using a Gyratory Compactor. Australia (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Alvarez, A.E., Lee, S.I., Torres, A., Walubita, L.F.: Comparison of flow number, dynamic modulus, and repeated load tests for evaluation of HMA permanent deformation. Constr. Build. Mater. 44, 391–398 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Holleran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Holleran, I., Wilson, D.J., Holleran, G., Walubita, L.F. (2019). Use of the Shear Box Compactor for Porous Asphalt Mix Property Assessment. In: Hossain, Z., Zhang, J., Chen, C. (eds) Solving Pavement and Construction Materials Problems with Innovative and Cutting-edge Technologies. GeoChina 2018. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95792-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics