Skip to main content

Truth Relativism and Evans’ Challenge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Eva Picardi on Language, Analysis and History
  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I develop a version of Evans’ challenge for MacFarlane’s assessment-sensitive relativism. The argument is meant to show that, contrary to MacFarlane’s intentions, the correctness of an assertion is a relative matter if the area of discourse has an assessment-sensitive semantics. Thus MacFarlane’s truth-relativism is an inherently unstable doctrine for it is unclear how we should behave in order to achieve the goal of an assertion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cappelen, H., and J. Hawthorne. 2009. Relativism and Monadic Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coliva, A., and S. Moruzzi. 2012. Truth Relativists Can’t Trump Moral Progress. Analytic Philosophy 53 (1): 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. 1979. Does Tense Logic Rest on a Mistake? ms, printed in G. Evans (1985), Collected Papers, 343–363. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenough, P. 2011. Truth-Relativism, Norm-Relativism, and Assertion. In Assertion: New Philosophical Essays, ed. J. Brown and H. Cappelen, 197–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J., and S. Yalcin. 2014. Epistemic Modals and Context: Experimental Data. Semantics and Pragmatics 7 (10): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölbel, M. 2002. Truth Without Objectivity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölbel, M. 2003. Faultless Disagreement. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 54 (1): 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, J. 2005. Making Sense of Relative Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, J. 2014. Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and Its Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, T. 2014. Relative Correctness. Philosophical Studies 167 (2): 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, J. 2014. Evans’s Challenge to Temporalism. Technical report, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moruzzi, S., and C. Wright. 2009. Trumping Assessments and the Aristotelian Future. Synthese 166 (2): 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastiano Moruzzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moruzzi, S. (2018). Truth Relativism and Evans’ Challenge. In: Coliva, A., Leonardi, P., Moruzzi, S. (eds) Eva Picardi on Language, Analysis and History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95777-7_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics