Abstract
Investors can play an important role in making sustainability considerations a strategic issue for corporate executives. The increasing availability of corporate sustainability data has led to investment approaches that consider sustainability metrics in investment processes. Investors incorporating environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria to generate long-term competitive financial returns and positive societal impact – so-called socially responsible investors (SRI) or ESG investors – have experienced significant client growth. This chapter describes ESG investing and explores the extent to which financial performance and sustainability are compatible and even mutually reinforcing. The concept of materiality is discussed, illustrating the need to focus sustainability efforts on areas that have financial importance to a company. A perspective on the electric power industry through the lens of an ESG investor is offered along with a discussion of investor challenges posed by certain trends in the industry, such as load defection, stranded asset risk, and climate change. While financial performance and sustainability are compatible in many instances, there are also a series of tradeoffs ESG investors face when financial or business needs collide with sustainability issues or one area of sustainability competes with another.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Stranded asset risk is the possibility that an asset, like a power plant, may become obsolete before the end of its expected life and therefore generate less value than its owners or investors had expected.
- 2.
Personal communication. October 28, 2017.
- 3.
Utility customers meeting part of their electricity demand with their own power generation, typically solar PV
- 4.
For a summary of how Germany’s nuclear phaseout came about, see Ref. [33].
- 5.
For a list of institutions participating in fossil fuel divestment, see www.gofossilfree.org/divestment/commitments
- 6.
For instance, as of the writing of this book, four large state pension funds in California and New York have either stopped investing in coal companies and/or are debating fossil fuel divestment initiatives.
- 7.
Personal communication. October 28, 2017.
- 8.
CCS projects typically improve their economic viability by using the sequestered carbon to enhance the output of oil fields, undermining climate benefits. Building large-scale CCS pilot projects helps commercialize the technology, however, with significant potential for long-term climate benefits.
- 9.
Based on Calvert data sourced from SNL.
References
Calvert International Equity Fund, Q1 2018, Calvert, https://www.calvert.com/includes/loadDocument.php?fn=23946.pdf&dt=fundpdfs%27. Accessed 25 May 2018.
Caldwell, Tiffany. “Vivint Solar accused of dishonest sales practices by New Mexico attorney general”. Salt Lake Tribune, March 11, 2018. https://www.sltrib.com/news/2018/03/11/vivint-solar-accused-of-dishonest-sales-practices-by-new-mexico-attorney-general Accessed March 25, 2018.
Klas, Mary Ellen. “Insider reveals deceptive strategy behind Florida’s solar amendment”. Miami Herald, October 18, 2016. http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/election/article109017387.html Accessed March 25, 2018.
Colby, Laura. Bloomberg, “Global sustainable investments grow 25% to $23 trillion”. July 24, 2017. https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/global-sustainable-investments-grow-25-23-trillion Accessed October 14, 2017.
Bresiger, Gregory. Financial Advisor Magazine, “Women, Millennials Want ESG Investments, Advisors Say“. October 20, 2017. https://www.fa-mag.com/news/women--millennials-want-esg-investments--advisors-say-35304.html Accessed December 4, 2017
Friede, Gunnar, Timo Busch, and Alexander Bassen. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies." Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 5.4 (2015): 210–233.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. “Fifth Assessment Report. 2014.” Working Group 3, Chapter 1, page 123. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter1.pdf Accessed July 9, 2017.
U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Capital Cost Estimates for Utility Scale Electricity Generating Plants.” Analysis & Projections. November 22, 2016. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/powerplants/capitalcost/pdf/capcost_assumption.pdf Accessed October 10, 2017.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, “U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System Cost Benchmark: Q1 2017.”, Figure ES-1. Press. September 12, 2017. Found at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/68925.pdf Accessed on November 22, 2016.
Solar Energy Industries Association, Solar Market Insight Reports 2011–2017. https://www.seia.org/us-solar-market-insight Accessed April 2, 2018.
U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Estimated small-scale solar photovoltaic generation by state, 2016.” Today in Energy. June 1, 2017. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=31452 Accessed October 10, 2017.
Rocky Mountain Institute, “The Economics of Grid Defection, 2017”. https://rmi.org/insights/reports/economics-grid-defection Accessed October 24, 2017.
Solar Energy Industries Association, “Solar Market Insight” reports for 2011 through 2017. https://www.seia.org/us-solar-market-insight Accessed November 12, 2017.
Calvert Research & Management, Ceres, CDP, and WWF. “Power Forward 3.0: How the largest US companies are capturing business value while addressing climate change”. April 25, 2017 https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/power-forward-3-0-how-the-largest-us-companies-are-capturing-business-value-while-addressing-climate-change Accessed January 14, 2018.
Rocky Mountain Institute, “Corporate Renewables Deals 2012–2017.” Business Renewables Center. http://businessrenewables.org/corporate-transactions Accessed November 15, 2017.
U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Utility-Scale Capacity Additions, Retirements and Changes by Energy Source, 2016.” Electricity, Table 4.6 https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_04_06.html Accessed November 15, 2017.
Maloney, Peter. Utility Dive. “EIA: Low gas prices set to drive decline in coal generation”, January 11, 2018. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/eia-low-gas-prices-set-to-drive-decline-in-coal-generation/514556 Accessed November 15, 2017.
Based on analysis of data sourced from S-Network and S&P Dow Jones Indices. Source data available at http://ardour.snetglobalindexes.com/sites/snardour/index-data, and https://www.spindices.com/indices/equity/sp-500 Accessed December 3, 2017
Sheppard, David. Financial Times, "Norway wealth fund proposes end to oil and gas investment". November 16, 2017. https://www.ft.com/content/611c2e9e-cad9-11e7-aa33-c63fdc9b8c6c Accessed March 20, 2018.
AXA press release, “AXA accelerates its commitment to fight climate change.” December 12, 2017 https://group.axa.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/axa-accelerates-its-commitment-to-fight-climate-change Accessed October 8, 2017.
JP Morgan Chase & Co. Sustainability. “Environmental and Social Policy Framework.” Page 9. Corporate Responsibility. https://www.jpmorganchase.com/corporate/Corporate-Responsibility/document/jpmc-environmental-and-social-policy-framework.pdf Accessed October 8, 2017
ING. Newsroom. December 12, 2017. https://www.ing.com/Newsroom/All-news/ING-further-sharpens-coal-policy-to-support-transition-to-low-carbon-economy.htm Accessed October 8, 2017.
World Bank, “World Bank Group Announcements at One Planet Summit” News. December 12, 2017 http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2017/12/12/world-bank-group-announcements-at-one-planet-summit Accessed October 8, 2017.
Fearnside, Philip M. "Environmental and social impacts of hydroelectric dams in Brazilian Amazonia: Implications for the aluminum industry." World Development 77 (2016): 48–65.
Moran, Thomas. "The environmental and socio-economic impacts of hydroelectric dams in Turkish Kurdistan." (2004).
Bade, Gavin. Utility Dive, "Vogtle nuke cost could top $25B as decision time looms”. August 3, 2017. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/vogtle-nuke-cost-could-top-25b-as-decision-time-looms/448555 Accessed September 25, 2017.
Samuelsohn, Darren. Politico, „Billions over budget. Two years after deadline. What’s gone wrong for the ‘clean coal’ project that’s supposed to save an industry?” May 26, 2015. https://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/05/billion-dollar-kemper-clean-coal-energy-project-000015 Accessed September 25, 2017.
Walton, Robert. Utility Dive, “Southern Co: Kemper coal economics take a hit from low gas prices”. February 24, 2017. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/southern-co-kemper-coal-economics-take-a-hit-from-low-gas-prices/436834 Accessed September 25, 2017.
Cardwell, Diane. New York Times, “NRG Seeks to Cut 90% of Its Carbon Emissions”. November 21, 2014. Page B3. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/21/business/energy-environment/nrg-sets-goals-to-cut-carbon-emissions.html Accessed September 27, 2017.
Smith, Rebecca. Wall Street Journal, “NRG Energy CEO David Crane Resigns”. December 3, 2015. https://www.wsj.com/articles/nrg-energy-ceo-david-crane-resigns-1449151435
NRG Energy, Q4 Earnings Call. February 28, 2017. Found at https://seekingalpha.com/article/4050498-nrg-energy-nrg-q4-2016-results-earnings-call-transcript?page=2 Accessed September 27, 2017.
Energias de Portugal 2016 Annual Report. Available at https://www.edp.com/sites/default/files/portal.com/documents/Annual%20Report%202016.pdf. Accessed on August 20, 2017.
World Nuclear Association, “Nuclear Power in Germany,” at http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/germany.aspx.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walther, M. (2019). Sustainable Electric Power from a Responsible Investing Perspective. In: Fox, J., Scott, M. (eds) Sustainable Electricity II. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95696-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95696-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95695-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95696-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)