Skip to main content

Do We Need Trade-Offs to Advance Climate Policy?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Electricity II
  • 264 Accesses

Abstract

Decarbonizing the energy and transportation sectors around the world is not another issue in achieving sustainability; it is the issue. Sustainability discussions often pit environmental concerns against social and economic priorities. Balancing climate as an equal concern with economic and societal priorities has achieved incremental change, but not the kind of sea change necessary to address the problem. This chapter suggests that these trade-offs may be a red herring in light of new technology and innovation, largely absent in the electric industry to date. It argues the trade-offs are institutional and behavioral rather than economic. This author makes the case for leadership and provides principles of prioritization and action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wuebbles, D.J., D.W. Fahey, K.A. Hibbard, B. DeAngelo, S. Doherty, K. Kayhoe, R. Horton, J.P. Kossin, P.C. Taylor, A.M. Waple, and C.P. Weaver, 2017: Executive summary, In: Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I [Wuebbles, D.J., D.W. Fahey, K. A. Hibbard, D.J. Dokken, B.C. Stewart and T.K. Maycock (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C., pp. 12–34, doi:https://doi.org/10.7930/JODJ5CTG, https://science2017.globalchange.gov/. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  2. Multi-Model Framework for Quantitative Sectoral Impacts Analysis: A Technical Report for the Fourth National Climate Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 430-R-17-001, May 2017, https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=532962. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  3. Kaufman, Leslie, “Is 100% Renewable Energy Feasible? New Paper Argues for a Different Target,” Inside Climate News, 19 June 2017, https://insideclimatenews.org/news/19062017/100-percent-renewable-energy-climate-change-targets. Accessed 15 February 2018.

  4. “Ratemaking and Utility Business Models,” America’s Power Plan, http://americaspowerplan.com/power-transformation-solutions/ratemaking-and-utility-business-models/. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  5. Pyper, Julia, “Large Corporations Are Driving America’s Renewable Energy Boom. And They’re Just Getting Started,” Greentech Media, 10 January, 2017, https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/large-corporations-are-driving-americas-renewable-energy-boom#gs.8NYf0OA. Accessed 15 February 2018.

  6. Lovins, Amory B. “The Negawatt Revolution,” Across The Board, The Conference Board Magazine , Vol. XXVII No. 9, September 1990, https://www.rmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/RMI_Negawatt_Revolution_1990.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  7. “National Energy Plan for Energy Efficiency,” United States Environmental Protection Agency, https://www.epa.gov/energy/national-action-plan-energy-efficiency. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  8. Energy Efficiency Trends in the Electric Power Industry, The Edison Foundation, Institute for Electric Innovation, December 2017, http://www.edisonfoundation.net/iei/publications/Documents/IEI_Energy%20Efficiency%20Report_Dec2017.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  9. “High Winds Bring Milestone for Iowa Utility’s Wind Power,” U.S. News and World Report, 28 October 2017. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/iowa/articles/2017-10-28/high-winds-bring-milestone-for-iowa-utilitys-wind-power. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  10. Chow, Lorraine, “Iowa's Largest Utility Eyes 100% Renewable Energy Goal,” EcoWatch, 2 May 2017, https://www.ecowatch.com/iowas-largest-utility-eyes-100-renewables-goal-2387877147.html?utm_campaign=RebelMouse&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_content=EcoWatch. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  11. Bade, Gavin, “EEI 2017: The utility sector's business case for deep decarbonization,” Utility Dive, 13 June 2017, https://www.utilitydive.com/news/eei-2017-the-utility-sectors-business-case-for-deep-decarbonization/444873/. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  12. “2018 Strategy,” United States Climate Alliance, https://www.usclimatealliance.org/. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  13. 2017 Annual Report: Alliance States Take the Lead, United States Climate Alliance, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5936b0bde4fcb5371d7ebe4c/t/59bc4959bebafb2c44067922/1505511771219/USCA_Climate_Report-V2A-Online-RGB.PDF. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  14. “America’s Pledge,” https://www.americaspledgeonclimate.com/. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  15. White House Announces Additional Commitments to The American Business Act on Climate Pledge,” White House Press Release, 1 December, 2015, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/01/white-house-announces-additional-commitments-american-business-act. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  16. Bakal, Dan, “The Power Sector Must Heed Shareholder Calls for 2-degree Scenario Analysis,” Utility Dive, 27 June 2017, https://www.utilitydive.com/news/the-power-sector-must-heed-shareholder-calls-for-2-degree-scenario-analysis/445950/. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  17. “The Power to Reduce CO2 Emissions, The Full Portfolio,” Discussion Paper Prepared for the EPRI 2007 Summer Seminar, Electric Power Research Institute, August 2007, http://mydocs.epri.com/docs/public/DiscussionPaper2007.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2018

  18. Bade, Gavin, “EEI 2017: The utility sector's business case for deep decarbonization,” Utility Dive, 13 June 2017, https://www.utilitydive.com/news/eei-2017-the-utility-sectors-business-case-for-deep-decarbonization/444873/. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  19. Evaluation of Conservation Voltage Reduction on a National Level, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-19596, July 2010, https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-19596.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2018.

  20. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, A “Choices, Values and Frames,” American Psychologist. 39 (4): 341–350, 1984, http://web.missouri.edu/~segerti/capstone/choicesvalues.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane Munns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Munns, D. (2019). Do We Need Trade-Offs to Advance Climate Policy?. In: Fox, J., Scott, M. (eds) Sustainable Electricity II. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95696-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95696-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95695-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95696-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics