Abstract
The purpose of the chapter is to analyse variations in local policy autonomy across countries and over time. Policy autonomy refers to the tasks that local authorities perform and the discretion they enjoy in the performance of those tasks. Policy autonomy is at the heart of local democracy as it sets the range of policy choice open to the elected representatives serving on local councils and therefore also the potential range of political choices presented to local voters. Policy choices drive political competition and accountability. Policy autonomy has increased over the time period analysed here in most of the countries included in the study. In some countries, the increase is rather marginal; in other countries policy autonomy has grown substantially. Nevertheless, the most remarkable finding is the range over variation in policy autonomy still existing across European countries, with the Nordic countries leading in terms of policy autonomy while Black Sea countries lag behind. This contrast has persisted throughout the period. The chapter analyses, furthermore, policy autonomy in detail, policy by policy. European countries also vary as regards the range of functions allocated to local government as well as the amount of discretion granted in performing the respective functions. The functional variation across countries suggests that the development of local policy autonomy in European countries follows distinctly national trajectories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Factor analysis of 12 PS sub-dimensions with eigenvalue set at 1.0 yields four factors. Factor 1: HOUSING+: PS_Housing01_2014, PS_Landuse_Zoning01_2014 PS_Socialassistance_Othersocialsecurity01_2014, PS_Education_Buildings01_2014
Factor 2: HEALTH: PS_Health_Healthcenters01_2014, PS_Health_Doctorspayments01_2014
Factor 3: BUILDING PERMITS +: PS_Landuse_Buildingpermits01_2014, PS_Socialassistance_Povertyrelief01_2014
Factor 4: EDUCATION +: PS_Education_Teachers01_2014, PS_Publictransport01_2014 (and strong negative association with police: -.773)
References
Baldersheim, H., & Ståhlberg, K. (Eds.). (1994). Towards the Self-Regulating Municipality: Free Communes and Administrative Modernization in Scandinavia. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Baldersheim, H., Illner, M., & Wollmann, H. (Eds.). (2003). Local Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Boyne, G. A. (1985). Theory, Methodology and Results in Political Science: The Case of Output Studies. British Journal of Political Science, 15, 473–515.
Boyne, G. A. (1996). Constraints, Choices and Public Policies. In Research in Urban Policy. (Vol. 6). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Dawson, R. E., & Robinson, J. A. (1963). Inter-Party Competition, Economic Variables, and Welfare Policies in the American States. Journal of Politics, 25, 265–289.
Dye, T. R. (1966). Politics, Economics, and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Heinelt, H., & Hlepas, N.-K. (2006). Typologies of Local Government Systems. In H. Bäck, H. Heinelt, & A. Magnier (Eds.), The European Mayor. Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Hesse, J. J., & Sharpe, L. J. (1991). Local Government in International Perspective: Some Comparative Observations. In J. J. Hesse (Ed.), Local Government and Urban Affairs in International Perspective (pp. 603–621). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Illner, M. (2010). Top-Down or Bottom-Up? Coping with Territorial Fragmentation in the Czech Republic. In H. Baldersheim & L. E. Rose (Eds.), Territorial Choice. The Politics of Boundaries and Borders. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F., & Lidström, A. (2011). Introduction. In J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, & A. Lidström (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298–310.
Marcou, G. (2010). Local competences in Europe. Situation in 2007. Study of the European Committee on Local and Regional Democracy (CDLR). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Mill, J. S. (1946). On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government. Edited with an introduction by R.B. McCallum. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
OECD. (2013). Fiscal Federalism 2014. Making Decentralisation Work. Paris: Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development.
Olson, M. (1969). Strategic Theory and Its Applications. The Principle of Fiscal Equivalence: The Division of Responsibilities among Different Levels of Government. American Economic Review, 59, 479–487.
Söderström, L. (1998). Fiscal Federalism: The Nordic Way. In J. Rattsø (Ed.), Fiscal Federalism and State-Local Finance. The Scandinavian Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Swianiewicz, P. (2014). An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 40(2), 292–311.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Government Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ladner, A. et al. (2019). Functional Responsibilities. In: Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95642-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95642-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95641-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95642-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)