Skip to main content

Dynamic Diagnostics of Limiting State of Milling Process Based on Poincaré Stroboscopic Mapping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of diagnosing the limiting state of the milling process based on the Poincaré stroboscopic mapping. A method based on a contactless measurement of the distance between the cutter body and the measuring transducer is proposed. In this case, a sequence constructed on the basis of the Poincaré stroboscopic mapping is used, for which statistical estimates to determine the roughness, ripple, and mathematical expectation of the size over the entire treated surface are given. The results of the experiment made it possible to obtain effective algorithms for processing information, which, in the course of cutting, allow us to evaluate the limiting states of the process for obtaining information on the replacement of the tool and its readjustment. The dependencies obtained in the work as a whole coincides with the realistic approach to the estimation of the dynamics of milling processes occurring in metal-cutting machines. According to this approach, it is possible to provide unchanged values of the microroughness height due to the redistribution of the geometric component of the roughness determined by the feed, and the evolutionary component that depends on the trajectory of work and the power of irreversible transformations in the cutting zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zakovorotny VL, Gubanova AA, Lukyanov AD (2017) Attractive manifolds in end milling. Russ Eng Res 37(2):158–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg S (1967) Henri Poincaré and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Am J Phys 35:934–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hintikka J (2012) IF logic, definitions and the vicious circle principle. J Philos Logic 41(2):505–517

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Budak E, Altintas Y (1995) Modeling and avoidance of static form errors in peripheral milling of plates. J. Mach Tools Manuf 35(3):459–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai JS, Liao CL (1999) Finite-element modelling of static surface errors in the peripheral milling of thin-walled workpiece. J. Mater Process Technol 94:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paris H, Peigne G, Mayer R (2004) Surface shape prediction in high-speed milling. J Mach Tools Manuf 44(15):1567–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kersting P, Biermann D (2009) Simulation concept for predicting workpiece vibrations in five-axis milling. J. Mach Sci Technol 13(2):196–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Voronov S, Kiselev I (2011) Dynamics of flexible detail milling. J Multi-body Dyn 225(3):110–117

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lamikiz A, Lopez de Lacalle LN, Sanchez JA, Bravo U (2005) Calculation of the specific cutting coefficients and geometrical aspects in sculptured surface machining. J. Mach Sci Technol 9(3):411–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Surmann T, Enk D (2007) Simulation of milling tool vibration trajectories along changing engagement conditions. J. Mach Tools Manuf 47(9):1442–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guzel BU, Lazoglu I (2003) Sculpture surface machining: a generalized model of ball-end milling force system. J. Mach Tools Manuf 43(5):453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Charpentier E, Ghys E, Lesne A (2010) The scientific legacy of Poincaré. Providence, American Mathematical Society, London Mathematical Society, London, RI

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodman N (1969) Languages of art. An approach to a theory of symbols. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mette C (1986) Invariantentheorie als Grundlage des Konventionalismus. Überlegungen zur Wissenschaftstheorie Jules Henri Poincarés, Die blaue Eule, Essen

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zahar E (2001) Poincaré’s philosophy.From conventionalism to phenomenology. Open Court, LaSalle

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Browder FE (1983) The mathematical heritage of Henri Poincaré. In: Proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics of the american mathematical society, vol 39. American Mathematical Society, Providence

    Google Scholar 

  17. Darrigol O (2004) The mystery of the Einstein-Poincaré connection. Isis 95:614–626

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldfarb W (1985) Poincaré against the Logicists, in History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. In: Aspray W, Kitcher P (eds). Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 61–81

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gray JJ (1991) Did Poincaré say set theory is a disease? Math Intell 13(1):19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vapnik VN, Chervonenkis AY (1974) Theory of pattern recognition. Nauka, Moscow, pp 55–60. (in Russia)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I express my gratitude to my scientific supervisor Zakovorotniy Vilor Lavrentievich for valuable advice in the planning of research and recommendations on the design of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Gubanova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gubanova, A.A. (2019). Dynamic Diagnostics of Limiting State of Milling Process Based on Poincaré Stroboscopic Mapping. In: Radionov, A., Kravchenko, O., Guzeev, V., Rozhdestvenskiy, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering. ICIE 2018. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95630-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95630-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95629-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95630-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics