Skip to main content

Belacquobatic Secrets: Deleuze and the Purgatorial Rebellion of the Beckettian Body

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 236 Accesses

Part of the book series: Performance Philosophy ((PPH))

Abstract

This chapter approaches the body in Beckett’s theatre through the concept of the secret which Deleuze and Guattari develop in A Thousand Plateaus, through the text of Beckett’s neither and through the idea of a presence of absence in Beckett’s work. Examining Come and Go, What Where and Footfalls, it invents a new concept—belacquobatic secrets—and sees this concept undergo variations as it tries to diagnose how relations of non-relation are established in performances of Beckett’s work. Further, it examines how the body resists representational categories and how Beckett establishes relations of non-relation between bodies and language, events and signification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In his discussion of the Greek Stoics, Uhlmann similarly proposes that the relation between body and event can be considered one of non-relation (Uhlmann 2009: 135 ). He does not, however, expand this observation in the directions we will take it.

  2. 2.

    First published in 1929, the subject of Dante… Bruno. Vico. Joyce was suggested by Joyce himself. The peculiar use of ellipses is Beckett’s own, with the dots indicating the number of centuries which separate each writer.

Works Cited

  • Blanchot, Maurice (1989) The Space of Literature, trans. Ann Smock, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Ruby (2005) A Beckett Canon, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, Simon (1998) ‘Who Speaks in the Work of Samuel Beckett?’, in Yale French Studies, No. 93, The Place of Maurice Blanchot, pp. 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gontarski, Stanley E. (2001) ‘The Body in The Body of Samuel Beckett’s Theatre’, in Samuel Beckett: Endlessness in the Year 2000 / Samuel Beckett Sans Fin L’An 2000, ed. Angela Moorjani & Carola Veit, New York: Rodopi, pp. 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb, Jonathan (1991) Beckett in Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenner, Hugh (1962) Samuel Beckett: A Critical Study, London: Calder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlson, James (1997) Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlson, James & Knowlson, Elizabeth (2007) Beckett Remembering / Remembering Beckett: Uncollected Interviews with Samuel Beckett & Memories of Those Who Knew Him, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, Karen (1987) ‘“Looking for Sense…”: The Spectator’s Response to Beckett’s Come and Go’, in Modern Drama, Vol. 30, No. 2, Summer 1987, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian (1992) A User’s Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia; Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maude, Ulrika (2011) ‘Beckett and the Laws of Habit’, in Modernism/Modernity, Vol. 18, No. 4, November 2011, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 814–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Breon (1976) ‘Art in Microcosm: The Manuscript Stages of Beckett’s Come and Go’, in Modern Drama, Vol. 19, No. 3, Fall 1976, pp. 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattie, David (2000) ‘Space, Time, and the Self in Beckett’s Late Theatre’, in Modern Drama, Vol. 43, No. 3, Fall 2000, pp. 393–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone, R. Thomas (1983) ‘“Faint, Though by No Means Invisible”: A Commentary on Beckett’s Footfalls’, in Modern Drama, Vol. 26, No. 4, Winter 1983, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 435–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlmann, Anthony (2009) Samuel Beckett and the Philosophical Image, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, James (2008) Gilles Deleuze’s Logic of Sense: A Critical Introduction and Guide, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth, Katharine (2001) Samuel Beckett’s Theatre: Life Journeys, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koczy, D. (2018). Belacquobatic Secrets: Deleuze and the Purgatorial Rebellion of the Beckettian Body. In: Beckett, Deleuze and Performance. Performance Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95618-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics