Skip to main content

Wealth Distribution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Galileo to Modern Economics

Abstract

This chapter begins with Michal Kalecki’s witty epigram, quoted by Josef Steindl (Random Process and the Growth of Firms. A study of the Pareto Law. Vienna: Griffin & Co., 1965, p. 18): “Economics consists of theoretical laws which nobody has verified and empirical laws which nobody can explain.” Never more than in the case of the empirical Pareto law has Kalecki’s witticism seemed so appropriate. Whether Pareto’s law is understandable or not, econophysicists consider the Pareto curve one of the forerunners of econophysics. The invariant distribution of income over time and space was clearly an economic phenomenon that economists were unable to account for or predict. Physicists were able to offer a different interpretation of the Pareto curve, based on appropriate methods and approaches, that contained it within the broader analysis of complex systems (see Richmond et al. Econophysics & Physical Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 16 ff.). Pareto law is introduced here as a stage in the journey toward econophysics. Its empirical features generated different interpretations, and now that it is largely a matter for the econophysicists many issues remain concerning its stability and universality, the mobility among different classes of income, and so on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, Gibrat (1931), in criticizing Pareto, said that a firm’s growth rate and size are independent of each other, that is, that small firms grow at the same rate as large firms. The Gibrat process is inconsistent with the Pareto size distribution.

References

  • Amoroso, L. 1925. “Ricerche intorno alla curva dei redditi.” Annali di matematica pura e applicata. 2(1): 123–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoroso, L. 1949. “Pareto matematico ed economista.” In Amoroso et al. Vilfredo Pareto, L’economista e il sociologo. Milan: Malfasi. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagni, T. 1915. Teoria matematica dei fenomeni collettivi. Florence: Barbèra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benini, R. 1897 (2001). “On Some Curves Described by Economic Phenomena Related to the Income Curve or That of Wealth.” In Roots of the Italian School of Economics and Finance: From Ferrara (1857) to Einaudi (1944), edited by Mario Baldassarri and Pierluigi Ciocca. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzi, M. 1988. “Un ‘Probabilista Neoclassico’: Francesco Paolo Cantelli.” Historia Mathematica 15: 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardelli, H. 1943. “The Stability of the Income Distribution.” Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics 6(4): 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, A. 1933. La teoria dell’equilibrio e gli schemi probabilistici. Bellinzona: Leins & Vescovi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, A. 1935a. “Il significato di alcune moderne teorie matematiche di dinamica economica.” Giornale degli economisti e rivista di statistica. 75: 161–210; 369–421; 580–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, A. 1935b. Il contenuto della dinamica economica. Venice: Libreria Emiliana Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, A. 1939. “Le teorie economiche di A. Cournot e l’ordinamento corporativo.” In Amoroso et al. Cournot nella economia e nella filosofia. Padua: Cedam, 183–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brambilla F. 1940. “Rappresentazione matematica ed interpretazione della curva dei redditi”. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 48(2): 166–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani-Turroni, C. 1939. “Annual Survey of Statistical Data: Pareto’s Law and the Index of Inequality of Incomes”. Econometrica 7.4:107–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantelli, F.P. 1921a. “Sulla deduzione delle leggi di frequenza da considerazioni di probabilità.” Metron, 1(3): 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantelli, F.P. 1921b. “Sulle applicazioni del calcolo delle probabilità alla fisica molecolare.” Metron, 1(1), 157–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelnuovo, G. 1919. Calcolo delle probabilità. Milan: Società Editrice Dante Alighieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champernowne, D.G. 1953. “A model of income distribution.” The Economic Journal 63(250): 318–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockshott, W.P., A.F. Cottrell, G.J. Michaelson, I.P. Wright, and V.M. Yakovenko. 2009. Classical Econophysics. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, G.E. 2015. “The Amoroso distribution.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.3274. Berkley.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Addario, R. 1936. “Le trasformate euleriane.” Annali dell’Istituto di Statistica dell’Università di Bari. 8. Bari: Macrì.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Addario, R. 1949. “Ricerche sulla curva dei redditi.” in Amoroso et al., Vilfredo Pareto. L’economista e il sociologo. Milan: Malfasi. 222–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibrat, R. 1931. Les inégalités économiques, Paris: Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, C. 1921. “Measurement of Inequality of Incomes.” Economic Journal 31.3:124–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttmann, Y.M. 1999. The Concept of Probability in Statistical Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. 1945. “On the Gibrat Distribution.” Econometrica 13: 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, C. and S. Kotz. 2003. Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maccabelli, T. 2009. “Measuring Inequality: Pareto’s Ambiguous Contribution.” History of Political Economy 41(1): 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. 1960. “The Pareto-Lévy Law and the Distribution of Income.” International Economic Review 1(2): 79–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, L. 1898. “Quelques exemples de distribution des salaries.” Journal de la Societé statistique de Paris: 193–206 and 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortara, Giorgio. 1911. “Note di economia induttiva: Sulla distribuzione dei redditi”. Giornale degli economisti e rivista di statistica 22.5:455–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. 1896 (1965). “La répartition des revenus.” In Pareto. “Ecrits sur la courbe de la répartition de la richesse.” Œuvres complete. 8, Genève: Droz. 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. 1906 (2014). Manuale di economia politica. English edition: Manual of Political Economy. 2014 (ed. by A. Montesano, A. Zanni, L. Bruni, J.C. Chipman, and M. McLure). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. 1916 (1935). Trattato di Sociologia Generale, 3 vols. English edition: The Mind and Society. A Treatise on General Sociology. 2 vols. 1935. New York: Dover. [Figure 5.1].

    Google Scholar 

  • Persky J. 1992. “Pareto’s Law.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(2): 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietra, G. 1935. “Intorno alla discordanza fra gli indici di variabilità e di concentrazione”. Bulletin de l’Institut international de statistique 28:171–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, U. 1916. “L’indice di variabilità e la curva dei redditi”. Giornale degli Economisti e Rivista di Statistica 27(9):177–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond P., J. Mimkes, and S. Hutzler. 2013. Econophysics & Physical Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steindl, J. 1965. Random Process and the Growth of Firms. A study of the Pareto Law. Vienna: Griffin & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinci, F. 1921. “Nuovi contributi allo studio della distribuzione dei redditi.” Giornale degli economisti e Rivista di Statistica 61(32): 365–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinci, F. 1924. “Calcolo delle probabilità e distribuzione dei redditi nel pensiero di Pareto.” Giornale degli economisti e Rivista di Statistica 64: 127–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tusset, G. (2018). Wealth Distribution. In: From Galileo to Modern Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95612-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95612-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95611-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95612-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics