Abstract
Osteoporosis is a systemic disorder of the skeleton which is characterized by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue (Fig. 45.1) with a resulting increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture [2, 3]. Osteoporosis is a major national health problem which affects an estimated 25 million men and women. Osteoporotic fractures cause significant morbidity and mortality for the individual and incur a significant economic cost. Vertebral fractures cause loss of height, pain, and deformity. Hip fractures pose an even more significant risk of death and disability compared to vertebral fractures: of the 300,000 hip fractures which occur every year in the United States, more than 30,000 will die within the first year after the fracture. Most who suffer a hip fracture never fully recover, and many never walk again unassisted. Nearly half will require nursing home care after the fracture. The cost of hospitalization, rehabilitation, and long-term care of individuals who have suffered a hip fracture totals more than $10 billion annually.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Osteopenia is a condition in which the BMD is lower than normal BMD but not low enough to be classified as osteoporosis.
References
Dempster DW, Shane E, Horbert W, et al. A simple method for correlative light and scanning electron microscopy of human iliac crest bone biopsies: qualitative observations in normal and osteoporotic subjects. J Bone Miner Res. 1986;1:15–21.
WHO. Prevention and management of osteoporosis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;921:1–164.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2004. p. 1–404.
IAEA. Dual energy x ray absorptiometry for bone mineral density and body composition assessment, in IAEA human health series. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); 2013.
Sabin MA, Blake GM, MacLaughlin-Black SM, et al. The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual x-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int. 1995;56:210–4.
Lorente Ramos RM, Azpeitia Arman J, Arevalo Galeano N, et al. Dual energy X-ray absorptimetry: fundamentals, methodology, and clinical applications. Radiologia. 2012;54:410–23.
Lorente-Ramos R, Azpeitia-Arman J, Munoz-Hernandez A, et al. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: a practical guide. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:897–904.
Crabtree NJ, Leonard MB, Zemel BS. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. In: Sawyer AJ, Bachrach LK, Fung EB, editors. Current clinical practice: bone densitometry in growing patients: guidelines for clinical practice. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 2007.
Chung KJ. Bone densitometry. Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:220–8.
Wilson CR. Essentials of bone densitometry for the medical physicist. https://www.aapm.org/meetings/03AM/pdf/9873-13152.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2017.
Cameron JR, Sorenson J. Measurement of bone mineral in vivo: an improved method. Science. 1963;142:230–2.
Thorson LM, Wahner HW. Single- and dual-photon absorptiometry techniques for bone mineral analysis. J Nucl Med Technol. 1986;14:163–71.
Christensen TE, Nunnally J. An introduction to the physics of diagnostic radiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1973.
Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT, et al. Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? Radiographics. 2010;30:1037–55.
Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM Jr, et al. The essential physics of medical imaging. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
Adams JE. Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:415–24.
Quantitative computed tomography. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_computed_tomography. Accessed 21 Nov 2017.
Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Genant HK, et al. The European Spine Phantom – a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Eur J Radiol. 1995;20:83–92.
Zanzonico P. Routine quality control of clinical nuclear medicine instrumentation: a brief review. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1114–31.
European spine phantom. http://www.qrm.de/content/products/bonedensity/esp.htm. Accessed 21 Nov 2017.
Damilakis J, Adams JE, Guglielmi G, et al. Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2707–14.
Blake GM, Naeem M, Boutros M. Comparison of effective dose to children and adults from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations. Bone. 2006;38:935–42.
Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zanzonico, P. (2019). Technical Aspects of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Quantitative Computed Tomography for Assessment of Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition. In: Volterrani, D., Erba, P.A., Carrió, I., Strauss, H.W., Mariani, G. (eds) Nuclear Medicine Textbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95564-3_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95564-3_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95563-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95564-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)