Advertisement

Reflections on Binary Thinking

  • Michael Bourdillon
  • Sylvia Meichsner
  • Afua Twum-Danso Imoh
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies on Children and Development book series (PSCD)

Abstract

The editors reflect on the nature of binary thinking arising in various forms in chapters presented in this volume. While related pairs of binary opposites enable the structuring of human experience, such thinking can be misleading if we fail to move beyond it. The chapter points to the need to discriminate in how to use this kind of classification. It points to both the necessity and the difficulty in overcoming the North–South divide in the current academic climate.

References

  1. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Poverty. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  2. Beazley, H., Bessell, S., Ennew, J., & Waterson, R. (2009). The Right to Be Properly Researched: Research with Children in a Messy, Real World. Children’s Geographies, 7(4), 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Easterly, W. (2013). The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Goody, J. (1977). The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kahnerman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  7. Leach, E. (Ed.). (1967). The Structural Study of Myth and Totemism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Lonne, B., Parton, N., Thomson, J., & Harries, M. (2009). Reforming Child Protection. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Lundy, L., & McEvoy, L. (2012). Children’s Rights and Research Processes: Assisting Children to (In)formed Views. Childhood, 19(1), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Punch, S. (2016). Cross-World and Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue: A More Integrated, Global Approach to Childhood Studies. Global Studies of Childhood, 6(3), 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Raffety, E. L. (2015). Minimizing Social Distance: Participatory Research with Children. Childhood, 22(3), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sloman, S., & Fernbach, P. (2017). The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  13. Spyrou, S. (2011). The Limits of Children’s Voices: From Authenticity to Critical, Reflexive Representation. Childhood, 18(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bourdillon
    • 1
  • Sylvia Meichsner
    • 2
  • Afua Twum-Danso Imoh
    • 2
  1. 1.African Studies Centre LeidenUniversity of ZimbabweHarareZimbabwe
  2. 2.Department of Sociological StudiesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations