Abstract
In this chapter, Carolin Stamm illustrates how research that heavily relies on fieldwork is profoundly influenced by the opportunities and constraints encountered during data collection, which often lie in the hands of gatekeepers. Taking a different approach from the usual scholarly discussions that focus on the role of the gatekeeper as a static figure to navigate around, Stamm uses her fieldwork with CBOs and NGOs in rural conservation projects in Namibia to reconceptualize the gatekeeper–researcher relationship. Through a critical evaluation of the role that gatekeepers played in the data collection process, analysis, and formation of her empirical findings, Stamm argues that the manner in which access to knowledge is negotiated should not be divorced from the results it generates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bondy, C. (2013). How Did I Get Here? The Social Process of Accessing Field Sites. Qualitative Research, 13(5), 578–590.
Brosius, J. P., Lowenhaupt Tsing, A., & Zerner, C. (1998). Representing Communities: Histories and Politics of Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Society and Natural Resources, 11(2), 157–168.
Campbell, L. M., Gray, N. J., Meletis, Z. A., Abbott, J. G., & Silver, J. J. (2006). Gatekeepers and Keymasters: Dynamic Relationships of Access in Geographical Fieldwork. Geographical Review, 96(1), 97–121.
Clark, T. (2008). We’re Over-Researched Here!’ Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue Within Qualitative Research Engagements. Sociology, 42(5), 953–970.
Clark, T. (2010). On ‘Being Researched’: Why Do People Engage with Qualitative Research? Qualitative Research, 10(4), 399–419.
Crowhurst, I. (2013). The Fallacy of the Instrumental Gate? Contextualising the Process of Gaining Access Through Gatekeepers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(6), 463–475.
De Laine, M. (2000). Fieldwork, Participation and Practice: Ethics and Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (2006). The Relational Foundation of Research: An Underappreciated Dimension of Interesting Research. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 21–26.
Easton, G. (2010). Critical Realism in Case Study Research. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 118–128.
Government of the Republic of Namibia. (2015). Poverty and Deprivation in Namibia 2015, Windhoek, Namibia: National Planning Commission. http://www.un.org.na/home_htm_files/NPC-Summary%20Report.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2017.
Grant, A. (2017). “I Don’t Want You Sitting Next to Me”: The Macro, Meso and Micro of Gaining and Maintaining Access to Government Organizations During Ethnographic Fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–11.
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative Methods in Management Research. London: Sage.
IRDNC—Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation. (2016). About Us/History and Awards. http://www.irdnc.org.na/history.html. Accessed October 27, 2017.
Jänis, J. (2014). The Tourism-Development Nexus in Namibia: A Study on National Tourism Policy and Local Tourism Enterprises’ Policy Knowledge. Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Jezewski, M. (1993). Culture Brokering as a Model for Advocacy. Nursing and Health Care, 14(2), 78–89.
Jones, B. T. B. (2010). The Evolution of Namibia’s Communal Conservancies. In F. Nelson (Ed.), Community Rights, Conservation and Contested Land: The Politics of Natural Resource Governance in Africa (pp. 106–120). London: Earthscan.
Kitchin, R., & Tate, N. (2013). Conducting Research in Human Geography: Theory, Methodology and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
Long, N. (2001). Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
Mandel, J. L. (2003). Negotiating Expectations in the Field: Gatekeepers, Research Fatigue and Cultural Biases. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24(2), 198–210.
McAreavey, R., & Das, C. (2013). A Delicate Balancing Act: Negotiating with Gatekeepers for Ethical Research When Researching Minority Communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 113–131.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. London: Sage.
Ministry of Environment and Tourism Namibia. (2013). National Policy on Community Based Natural Resource Management. http://www.met.gov.na/files/files/CBNRM_20Policy%20Approved.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2018.
Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating Development. London: Pluto Press.
Mulhall, A. (2003). In the Field: Notes on Observation in Qualitative Research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306–313.
NACSO—Namibian Association for CBNRM Support Organizations. (2017). Conservancies and Conservancies Overview. http://www.nacso.org.na/conservation-and-conservancies. Accessed September 27, 2017.
Peace Parks Foundation. (2017). Kavango Zambezi. http://www.peaceparks.org/tfca.php?pid=27&mid=1008. Accessed October 7, 2017.
Reeves, C. (2010). A Difficult Negotiation: Fieldwork Relations with Gatekeepers. Qualitative Research, 10(3), 315–331.
Ribot, J. C. (2002). Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: Institutionalizing Popular Participation. Washington: World Resources Institute.
Robson, C. (1993). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioners-Researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
Scott, S., Miller, F., & Lloyd, K. (2006). Doing Fieldwork in Development Geography: Research Culture and Research Spaces in Vietnam. Geographical Research, 44(1), 28–40.
Shaw, I. (2008). Ethics and the Practice of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Social Work, 7(4), 400–414.
Silverman, D. (2010). Doing Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Siwale, J. (2015). Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance Institutions. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1–12.
Stevens, S. (2001). Fieldwork as Commitment. The Geographical Review, 91(1–2), 66–73.
Sullivan, S. (2002). How Sustainable is the Communalizing Discourse of ‘New’ Conservation: The Masking of Difference, Inequality and Aspiration in the Fledgling “Conservancies” of Namibia. In D. Chattyand & M. Colchester (Eds.), Conservation and Mobile Indigenous Peoples (pp. 158–197). Oxford: Berghahn Press.
Sullivan, S. (2003). Dissent or Libel in Resistance to a Conservancy in North-West Namibia. In E. Berglund & D. Anderson (Eds.), Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege (pp. 69–86). Oxford: Berghahn Press.
Tushman, M. L., & Katz, R. (1980). External Communication and Project Performance: An Investigation into the Role of Gatekeepers. Management Science, 26(11), 1071–1085.
Wanat, C. L. (2008). Getting Past the Gatekeepers: Differences Between Access and Cooperation in Public School Research. Field Methods, 20(2), 191–208.
Wolcott, H. F. (2005). The Art of Fieldwork. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
WWF—World Wide Fund For Nature. (2016). Namibia: The Greatest Wildlife Recovery Story Ever Told. http://www.worldwildlife.org/pages/namibia-the-greatest-wildlife-recovery-story-evertold. Accessed May 31, 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stamm, C.H. (2019). Gatekeeping Success in the Namibian CBNRM Program. In: Johnstone, L. (eds) The Politics of Conducting Research in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95531-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95531-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95530-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95531-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)