Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Global Diplomacy and International Society pp 7–51Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The (Not So Pure) Concept of Diplomacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 738 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, Spies provides a conceptual framework for the academic study of diplomacy. Diplomatic theory is examined, with explanation of who is writing about diplomacy and why they are doing so. Key assumptions about diplomacy are investigated: Is it always peaceful and geared towards peaceful outcomes? Are states the only international actors who ‘do’ diplomacy? Why is there a distinct (and controversial) relationship between power and diplomacy? Diplomacy’s position vis-à-vis foreign policy and the latter’s spectrum of instruments is explained; as are elements that are central to the intrinsic nature of diplomacy: intermediation, representation, authority, reciprocity and continuous communication. Providing thus the wider conceptual context, this chapter makes it clear why diplomacy is—and has always been—a central institution of international society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Sources Used

  • Adler-Nissen, R. (2014). Stigma management in international relations: Transgressive identities, norms, and order in international society. International Organization, 68, 143–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, C. (2015). International organizations (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barston, R. P. (2006). Modern diplomacy (3rd ed.). London: Pearson/Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (1999). The diplomacy of revolutionary states. In J. Melissen (Ed.), Innovation in diplomatic practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, G. R., & James, A. (2003). A dictionary of diplomacy (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, G. R., Keens-Soper, M., & Otto, T. (2001). Diplomatic theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992, June 17). An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping (Rep. of the Secretary-General, United Nations GA and SC. A/47/277, S/24111).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutros-Ghali, B. (1999). Unvanquished: A US—UN Saga. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calvet de Magalhães, J. (1988). The pure concept of diplomacy (B. F. Pereira, Trans.). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1987). Theatre of power: The art of diplomatic signalling. London and New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1999). Reflections on the new global diplomacy: Statecraft 2500 BC to 2000 AD. In J. Melissen (Ed.), Innovation in diplomatic practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C., & Packer, J. (2006). Options and techniques for quiet diplomacy. The Folke Bernadotte Academy, conflict prevention handbook series. Stockholm: Edita.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou, C. M. (1996). On the way to diplomacy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, D. (2009). Guerrilla diplomacy: The revolution in diplomatic affairs. World Politics Review: Reinventing Diplomacy, 5–8. http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com.

  • D’Agostino, A. (2012, November). Diplomatic history, world history, and the great scramble. Historically Speaking, 13, 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Callières, F. (1716). De la Manière de négocier avec les Souverains. Paris: Mercure Galant (Translated from the French by A. F. Whyte, and published as ‘On the manner of negotiating with Princes’ by Houghton Mifflin Co, Boston and New York, 1919). Available online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembinski, L. (1988). The modern law of diplomacy: External missions of states and international organizations. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1987). On diplomacy: A genealogy of Western estrangement. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditchley Foundation. (2010, March). A note by the director, following a conference on “The functions and purposes of modern diplomacy”, Ditchley, UK, 4–6. http://www.ditchley.co.uk/conferences/past-programme/2010-2019/2010/modern-diplomacy. Accessed 29 Jan 2013.

  • Faizullaev, A. (2013). Diplomacy and symbolism. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 8(2), 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geldenhuys, D. (2009). Contested states in world politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnell, J. G. (1981). Encounters of a third kind: The alienation of theory in American political science. American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 440–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haass, R. N. (2013, August 28). Twitter feed of Richard Haass (Twitter handle: @RichardHaass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K., & Langhorne, R. (1995). The practice of diplomacy: Its evolution, theory and administration. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, B. (1999). Catalytic diplomacy: Beyond ‘newness’ and ‘decline’. In J. Melissen (Ed.), Innovation in diplomatic practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, K. J. (2004). Taming the sovereigns: Institutional change in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IRIN News. (2008, December 5). Botswana to close its Harare embassy. Gaborone. http://www.irinnews.org/news/2008/12/05-0. Accessed 12 July 2016.

  • Jackson, R. (2000). The global covenant: Human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A. (1993). Diplomacy. Review of International Studies, 19, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, C., & Hall, M. (2005). Essence of diplomacy. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keens-Soper, H. M. A. (1973, September). Francois De Callieres and diplomatic theory. The Historical Journal, 16(3), 485–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keens-Soper, H. M. A. (1996). Abraham de Wicquefort and diplomatic theory. Leicester: Centre for the Study of Diplomacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. R. (2010). The new diplomacy: Evolution of a revolution. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 21(2), 286–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. A. (1994). Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhorne, R. (1998). History and the evolution of diplomacy. In J. Kurbalija (Ed.), Modern diplomacy. Malta: Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, University of Malta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhorne, R. (2005). The diplomacy of non-state actors. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 16(2), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, E. M. (2013, June 21). Taliban changes name of Qatar office. Associated Press. http://www.3news.co.nz/Taliban-changes-name-of-Qatar-office/tabid/417/articleID/302316/Default.aspx.

  • McDowell, M. (2008). Public diplomacy at the crossroads: Definitions and challenges in an ‘open source’ era. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 32(3), (Special Ed.), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melissen, J. (2011, October). Beyond the new public diplomacy (Clingendael Paper (3)). Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1972). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (5th ed.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J., & Thompson, K. W. (1985). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (6th ed.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, M. E. 1975. Suid-Afrika se buitelandse verteenwoordiging, 1910–1972. MA-verhandeling, Universiteit van Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. (2006). Reordering diplomatic theory for the twenty-first century: A tripartite approach. D.Phil. thesis, Bond University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. (2009). Towards an enhanced understanding of diplomacy as the business of peace. In N. Gertz (Ed.), War fronts: Interdisciplinary perspectives on war, virtual war and human security. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanjira, D. D. (2010). African foreign policy and diplomacy from antiquity to the 21st century (2 vols.). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S. G. (1998). International relations theory and the Third World. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy, 80, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2009, July/August). Get smart: Combining hard and soft power. Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65163/joseph-s-nye-jr/get-smart. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.

  • Petrovsky, V. (1998). Diplomacy as an instrument of good governance. In J. Kurbalija (Ed.), Modern diplomacy. Malta: Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, University of Malta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D. J. (1998). Third World thinking and contemporary international relations. In S. G. Neuman (Ed.), International relations theory and the Third World. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, K. S. (2004). Diplomatic culture and its domestic context. In H. Slavik (Ed.), Intercultural communication and diplomacy (pp. 381–390). Malta: DiploFoundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, K. S. (2017). A new bilateralism in a changing world. Comments during a webinar hosted by DiploFoundation on 6 June 2017. https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/new-bilateralism-changing-world. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • Reus-Smit, C. (2004). Society, power and ethics. In C. Reus-Smit (Ed.), The politics of international law. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rothgeb, J. M. (1995). The changing international context for foreign policy. In L. Neack, J. A. K. Hey, & P. J. Haney (Eds.), Foreign policy analysis: Continuity and change in its second generation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozental, A., & Buenrostro, A. (2013). Bilateral diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satow, E. M. (1917). A guide to diplomatic practice. London and New York: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satow, E. M. (1979). Satow’s guide to diplomatic practice (5th rev. ed., L. Gore-Booth & D. Pakenham, Ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, P. (1999). For diplomacy: Representation and the study of international relations. International Studies Review, 1, 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, P. (2009). Diplomatic theory of international relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. N. (2008). International law (6th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sofer, S. (1988). Old and new diplomacy: A debate revisited. Review of International Studies, 14(3), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. (2011, January–August). The United Nations and the quest for world peace. Crossroads: The Macedonian Foreign Policy Journal, II(4), 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. (2013). A balance of interests. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thucydides. (1954). History of the Peloponnesian War (R. Warner, Trans.). Baltimore: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toynbee, A. J. (1947). A study of history. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerer, C. (2007). The ‘Middle Power’ concept in Australian foreign policy. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 53(4), 538–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (1999). International relations theory: Realism, pluralism, globalism and beyond (3rd ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, N. J. (2000). Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (1997). Diplomacy. In J. Baylis & S. Smith (Eds.), The globalisation of world politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. (1978). Power politics (original edition 1946; edited and expanded on by H. Bull and C. Holbraad). New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, G. (1999). Polylateralism and new modes of global dialogue. Leicester: Centre for the Study of Diplomacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, G. (2005). Pax Americana: Bumping into diplomatic culture. International Studies Perspectives, 6, 409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R. (1997). Still lying abroad: On the institution of the resident ambassador. Leicester: Centre for the Study of Diplomacy (33), University of Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarakol, A. (2014, July). What made the modern world hang together: Socialisation or stigmatisation? International Theory, 6(2), 311–332.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Yolanda Kemp Spies

Authors
  1. Yolanda Kemp Spies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yolanda Kemp Spies .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spies, Y.K. (2019). The (Not So Pure) Concept of Diplomacy. In: Global Diplomacy and International Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95525-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation