Abstract
The idea in this paper is to lodge the creativity construct within the project of understanding human development as having to do, at the very core, with its transformative rather than adaptive, conformist nature. This project is also, and non-coincidentally, about ascertaining fundamental equality of all human beings. In the transformative activist stance (TAS) approach, there are no impenetrable walls separating any one person from the most prolific “giants” history has ever known. The gist of this anti-elitist view is that all humans can be credited with the amazingly creative, transformative agency and creativity in their seemingly—only seemingly!—mundane and ordinary lives. The core of creativity, like freedom, is about dissent, resistance, discord, challenge, critique, and ultimately, about acts of moving beyond what is given, a process that transcends (or deconstructs) the status quo and its entrenched structures, phenomena, and elements. Every human encounter and action are always novel, unrepeatable, and creative. Along these lines, creativity studies, which too often comply with the canons of mainstream approaches, potentially can be revolutionized to challenge the many myths of its own creation.
“Freedom is always the freedom of the dissenter”
Rosa Luxemburg
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). New York: Cambridge University.
Bloch, E. (1986). The principle of hope (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
Connery, M. C., John-Steiner, V., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (Eds.). (2018). Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts(2nd edition). New York: Peter Lang.
Costall, A. (2015). Canonical affordances and creative agency. In V. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from social and cultural psychology (pp. 45–57). London: Routledge.
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge.
Cushman, P. (2012). Defenseless in the face of the status quo: Psychology without critical humanities. The Humanistic Psychologist, 40(3), 262–269.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind. How psychology found its language. London: Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of “No Child Left Behind”. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 10, 245–260.
Gardner, H. (Ed.). (2007). Responsibility at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gatto, J. T. (2001). Weapons of mass instruction: A schoolteacher’s journey through the dark world of compulsory schooling. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.
Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2017). A culture-inclusive, socially engaged agenda for creativity research. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 338–340.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.
Kucsera, J., & Orfield, G. (2014). New York State’s extreme school segregation: Inequality, inaction and a damaged future. Los Angeles: University of California.
Kirschner, S. R., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (2010). The sociocultural turn in psychology. New York: Columbia University.
Marx, K. (1978/1846). The German ideology. In R. Tucker (Ed.), Marx/Engels reader (pp. 146–200). New York: Norton.
Moran, S. (2008). Creativity: A systems perspective. In T. Richards, M. Runco, & S. Moger (Eds.), The Routledge companion to creativity. London: Routledge.
Moran, S. (2010). The roles of creativity in society. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 74–90). New York: Cambridge University.
Orfield, G. (2014). Tenth annual Brown lecture: A new civil rights agenda for American education. Educational Researcher, 43, 273–292.
Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Sawyer, K. (2015). Preface: The sociocultural approach to creativity. In V. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from social and cultural psychology (pp. xii–xiv). London: Routledge.
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12.
Stetsenko, A. (1990). On the role and status of methodology in psychology. [О роли и статусе методологического знания в психологии]. Vestnik MGU, Psihologija, 2, 39–50.
Stetsenko, A. (2007). Being-through-doing: Bakhtin and Vygotsky in dialogue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 25–37.
Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 465–485.
Stetsenko, A. (2010). Teaching-learning and development as activist projects of historical becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(1), 6–16.
Stetsenko, A. (2012). Personhood: An activist project of historical becoming through collaborative pursuits of social transformation. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 144–153.
Stetsenko, A. (2013). The challenge of individuality in cultural-historical activity theory: “Collectividual” dialectics from a transformative activist stance. Outlines – Critical Practice Studies, 14(2), 7–28.
Stetsenko, A. (2015). Theory for and as social practice of realizing the future: Implications from a transformative activist stance. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & K. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology (pp. 102–116). New York: Wiley.
Stetsenko, A. (2016). The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to development and education. New York: Cambridge University.
Stetsenko, A., & Ho, G. (2015). The serious joy and the joyful work of play: Children becoming agentive actors in co-authoring themselves and their world through play. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(2), 221–234.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stetsenko, A. (2019). Creativity as Dissent and Resistance: Transformative Approach Premised on Social Justice Agenda. In: Lebuda, I., Glăveanu, V.P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95497-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95498-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)