Advertisement

Factors in Reporting Mobile Victimization in South African Schools

  • Michael KyobeEmail author
  • Shallen Lusinga
Chapter

Abstract

The report by UNESCO and UN Women (Global guidance on addressing school-related gender-based violence, UNESCO Publishing, New York, NY, 2016) provides extensive guidance on addressing school-related gender-based violence (SRGBV). This report makes several recommendations on how to deal with the mistreatment, bullying, psychological abuse and sexual harassment that students are experiencing at school. It also identifies safe, easily accessible and confidential reporting mechanisms as key in addressing SRGBV.

While reporting has been identified as relevant and useful in combating SRGBV, challenges in developing and maintaining mechanisms for reporting persist. Schools in particular lack systems for reporting SRGBV, and students do not trust some of the reporting mechanisms. This is not only limited to reporting traditional forms of violence. Similar challenges have been identified in cyberbullying literature. Reporting violence in schools is particularly important in a country like South Africa where the rate of crime remains the highest in the world. Understanding the circumstances under which victims decide to report (or not report) is important for effective implementation of the UNESCO and UN Women SRGBV recommendations and for the development of appropriate interventions.

Studies on crime reporting provide mechanisms for predicting reporting behaviour that are based mainly on sociological, economical or psychological models. However, focusing on one theoretical model may fail to capture the complexity of the factors influencing a victim’s decision to (or not to) report aggression. A broader theoretical perspective would allow for identification of the various motivating factors which normally do not operate exclusively. In addition, most existing studies have focused on traditional forms of violence. Victimization in schools is increasingly committed using mobile technology, which makes it imperative to examine the problem of reporting in a mobile environment. Reporting practices in a digital context may, however, differ in some aspects from reporting in a purely non-technological environment, and these may vary across cultural groupings.

The present study examines the effects of various factors on reporting mobile victimization in South African schools. It develops a theoretical framework that integrates the sociological, psychological, economic and technological theories. Based on this framework, a mobile application was developed to enable students to report incidents of mobile victimization. The mobile application is currently being tested in schools in South Africa. Preliminary findings in Cape Town suggest that while economic, psychological, cultural-sociological and technological factors influence students’ decisions to report mobile victimization, cultural and social factors appear to be more predominant. The present study also reports on the implementation of the UNESCO and UN Women recommendations by the South African government.

References

  1. Ayodele, J. O., & Aderinto, A. A. (2016). Socio-cultural conditions of victims and their crime reporting practices in Lagos, Nigeria. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies: AJCJS, 9(1), 207–242.Google Scholar
  2. Bagshaw, D., Chung, D., Couch, M., Lilburn, S., & Wadham, B. (2000). Reshaping responses to domestic violence. Adelaide, Australia: University of South Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Black, D. J. (1976). The behavior of law. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boux, H. J., & Daum, C. W. (2015). At the intersection of social media and rape culture: How Facebook postings, texting and other personal communications challenge the real rape myth in the criminal justice system. Journal of Law, Technology, and Policy, 1(2015), 149–186.Google Scholar
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breetzke, G. (2010). A socio-structural analysis of crime in the city of Tshwane, South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 106(11–12), 1–7.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard university press.Google Scholar
  9. Bursik, R. J. & Grasmick H. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexinton, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, J. (2016). South Africa’s shock crime statistics: More worrying than corruption? Expert analysis. Retrieved from http://www.biznews.com/leadership/2016/09/13/south-africas-shock-crime-statistics-more-worrying-than-corruption-expert-analysis/
  11. CRCVC. (2009). Victim Blaming. Retrieved from http://crcvc.ca/docs/victim_blaming.pdf
  12. Creecy, B. (2012). Gauteng education MEC Barbara Creecy’s opening address at the colloquium on bullying at Turffontein Racecourse 21 August 2012. Retrieved from http://www.education.gpg.gov.za/Media/Statements/Documents/Media%20Statement%20-%20MEC%20address%20at%20colloquium%2021%20August%202012.pdfGoogle Scholar
  13. Emeakaroha, E. (2002). Seminar Paper presented by Rev. Fr. Dr. Emeka Emeakaroha On the 14th of March 2002 At the Theological department of the University of Vienna Austria. Retrieved from http://www.emeka.at/african_cultural_vaules.pdf
  14. eNCA.com. (2017). Reports of bullying in Gauteng schools on the rise. Retrieved from https://www.enca.com/south-africa/reports-bullying-gauteng-schools-rise
  15. Epstein, A., & Kazmierczak, J. (2006). Cyberbullying: What teachers, social workers, and administrators should know. Illinois child welfare, 3(1– 2), 41–51.Google Scholar
  16. Goudriaan, H. (2006). Reporting crime: Effects of social context on the decision of victims to notify the police. Heike Goudriaan.Google Scholar
  17. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenberg, M. S., & Beach, S. R. (2004). Property crime victims’ decision to notify the police: Social, cognitive, and affective determinants. Law and Human Behaviour, 28(2), 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ishii, K. (2011). Examining the adverse effects of mobile phone use among Japanese adolescents. Keio Communication Review, 33(2011), 69–83.Google Scholar
  20. Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Gould, M. (2010). The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(5), 282–288.Google Scholar
  21. Lancaster, L. (2017). Why are South Africans underreporting on crime? Retrieved from https://issafrica.org/iss-today/why-are-south-africans-underreporting-on-crime
  22. Law, D., Shapka, J., Hymel, S., Olson, B., & Waterhouse, T. (2012). The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, C. H. (2011). An ecological systems approach to bullying behaviors among middle school students in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1664–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, Q. (2010). Cyberbullying in high schools: A study of students’ behaviors and beliefs about this new phenomenon. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 19(4), 372–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Kelly, A. (2016). Cyberbullying: Incidence, trends and consequences. In Ending the torment: Tackling bullying from the Schoolyard to Cyberspace (pp. 115–120). New York, NY: United Nations Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Violence against Children.Google Scholar
  26. Lusinga, S., & Kyobe, M. (2017). Testing a typology of mobile phone victimisation using cluster analysis. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 78(6), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marcum, C., Higgins, G., & Ricketts, M. (2010). Potential factors of online victimization of youth: An examination of adolescent online behaviours utilizing routine activity theory. Deviant Behavior, 31(5), 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mbalula, F. (2017). Minister Fikile Mbalula – Speech at the Gender-Based Violence And Protection of Vulnerable Groups. Retrieved from http://www.policesecretariat.gov.za/newsroom/speeches/MINISTER_FIKILE_MBALULA_SPEECH_AT_THE_GENDER_BASED_VIOLENCE_AND_PROTECTION_OF_VULNERABLE_GROUPS.pdf
  29. Mtshazi, S., & Kyobe, M. (2014). Investigating the role of the law enforcement in combating mobile bullying in South African high schools. Retrieved from http://www.ictforafrica.org/images/stories/downloads/ICT4A2014Proceddings/ConferencePapers/ict4a-84-%20mtshazi.pdf .
  30. Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(2), 241–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ndyave, Z. C., & Kyobe, M. (2017). Factors that influence mobile bully-victim behaviour on social media: The case of Facebook. Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 8(4), 230–233.Google Scholar
  32. Neubaum, G. (2016). Monitoring and expressing opinions on social networking sites empirical investigations based on the spiral of silence theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Duisburg-Essen.Google Scholar
  33. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olawoye, J. E., Omololu, F. O., Aderinto, Y., Adeyefa, I., Adeyemo, D., & Osotimehin, B. (2004). Social construction of manhood in Nigeria: implications for male responsibility in reproductive health. African population studies, 19(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  35. Olweus, D. (1997). Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(4), 495–510Google Scholar
  36. Oosterwyk, G. (2013). Mobile bullying in South Africa – Exploring its nature, influencing factors and implications. Masters Dissertation, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  37. Orpinas, P., & Horne, A. (2006). Bullying prevention: Creating a positive school climate and developing social competence. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  38. Palekar, S., Atapattu, M., Sedera, D., & Lokuge, S. (2015). Exploring spiral of silence in digital social networking spaces (p. 2015). Fort Worth, TX: Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems.Google Scholar
  39. Parliamentary Monitoring Group. (2015). School Safety/Violence & Bullying in Schools; Quality Learning and Teaching Campaign (QLTC) Implementation: progress report. Retrieved from https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/21219/
  40. Parliamentary Monitoring Group. (2016). Department of Basic Education on its 2015/16 Annual Report, in presence of Minister & Deputy Minister. Retrieved from https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/23528/
  41. Parliamentary Monitoring Group. (2017). Safety in Schools: DBE & SAPS briefing; Feedback on KZN Oversight Visit. Retrieved from https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/25230/
  42. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pauli-Pott, U., Haverkock, A., Pott, W., & Beckmann, D. (2007). Negative emotionality, attachment quality, and behavior problems in early childhood. Infant Mental Health Journal, 28(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pettalia, J. L., Levin, E., & Dickinson, J. (2013). Cyberbullying: Eliciting harm without consequence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2758–2765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pintado, I. (2006). Perceptions of school climate and bullying in middle schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida.Google Scholar
  46. Posick, C. (2014). Victimization and reporting to the police: The role of negative emotionality. Psychology of violence, 4(2), 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pousttchi, K., Weizmann, M., & Turowski, K. (2003). Added value-based approach to analyze electronic commerce and mobile commerce business models. 2003 Proceedings International Conference Management and Technology in the New Enterprise, La Habana, Cuba. Del 22 al 25 de Abril del 2003, 414–423.Google Scholar
  48. Pratt, T., Holtfreter, K., & Reisig, M. (2010). Routine online activity and internet fraud targeting: Extending the generality of routine activity theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rennison, C. M., Gover, A. R., Bosick, S. J., & Dodge, M. (2011). Reporting violent victimization to the police: A focus on Black, White, Asian, and Hispanic adolescent victims. The open family studies journal, 4(2011), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Samkange-Zeeb, F., & Blettner, M. (2009). Emerging aspects of mobile phone use. Emerging Health Threats Journal, 2(1), 7082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. SA News.gov.za. (2011). SA’s violent crime has roots in apartheid, says report. Retrieved from http://www.sanews.gov.za/features/sas-violent-crime-has-roots-apartheid-says-report
  52. Savahl, S., Adams, S., Isaacs, S., Hendricks, G., Matzdorff, A., Wagenaar, C., Abrahams, L., & September, R. (2015). Children’s Worlds National Report: South Africa. Children’s Worlds Project. Retrieved from http://www.isciweb.org/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/SouthAfrica_NationalReport_Final.pdf
  53. Schonteich, M., & Louw, A. (2001). Crime in South Africa: A country and cities profile. Institute for Security Studies Papers: Pretoria, South Africa, 2001(49).Google Scholar
  54. Sibanda-Moyo, N., Khonje, E., & Kyerewaa Brobbey, M. (2017). Violence against women in South Africa, A Country In Crisis. Retrieved from http://www.csvr.org.za/pdf/Full-report-to-client.pdf
  55. Sidebottom, A. (2014). On the correlates of reporting assault to the police in Malawi. British Journal of Criminology, 55(2), 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Slonje, R., Smith, P., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Styron, R. A., Jr., Bonner, J. L., Styron, J. L., Bridgeforth, J., & Martin, C. (2016). Are teacher and principal candidates prepared to address student cyberbullying? Journal of At-Risk Issues, 19(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
  59. Swingle, M. (2016). i-Minds: How cell phones, computers, gaming, and social media are changing our brains, our behavior, and the evolution of our species. Gabriola, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. Tolsma, J., Blaauw, J., & Te Grotenhuis, M. (2012). When do people report crime to the police? Results from a factorial survey design in the Netherlands, 2010. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(2), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. UNESCO, & UN Women. (2016). Global guidance on addressing school-related gender-based violence. New York, NY: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Walsh, A., & Hemmens, C. (2010). Introduction to criminology: A text/reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Williams III, F. P., & McShane, M. D. (2010). Criminology theory: Selected classic readings. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations