Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Entrenching Women’s Imprisonment: An Anti-carceral Critique of Rights Based Advocacy and Reform

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights and Incarceration

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

Campaigns challenging conditions in women’s imprisonment yield rich evidence of the repeated failures associated with penal reform programmes. In the Australian state of Victoria, such programmes have consistently failed to mitigate the discriminatory treatment and brutal conditions. Reforms have provided a progressive veneer, but have enabled the legitimisation and expansion of women’s imprisonment. Focused on the work of the pioneering 1982 Fairlea Research Group (FRG), this chapter takes an abolitionist position in assessing the complex relationships between rights discourse, imprisonment, reform and abolition. We show that while liberal rights-based frameworks can lay critical foundations for anti-carceral feminist activism, they provide an untenable mechanism for transforming and eliminating the violence and inequity embedded within and reproduced through the institutional structures of prisons and punishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender Responsive Strategies: Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections [NIC].

    Google Scholar 

  • Braz, R. (2006). Kinder, gentler, gender responsive cages: Prison expansion is not prison reform. Women, Girls, & Criminal Justice, 7(6), 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Schept, J. (2016). New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies. Punishment & Society, 19(4), 440–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, K. (2008). In an Abusive State: How Neoliberalism Appropriated the Feminist Movement against Sexual Violence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (1983). Women’s Imprisonment: A Study in Social Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (1988). Women, Crime and Poverty. Milton Keyes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, B. (2016). Penal reform, anti-carceral feminist campaigns and the politics of change in women’s prisons, Victoria, Australia. Punishment & Society. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516680205. Accessed February 7, 2018.

  • Carlton, B., & Russell, E. K. (2015). “A gender for change”: Cycles of women’s penal reform and reconfigurations of anti-prison resistance in Victoria, Australia. Champ pénal/Penal Field, 12, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, B., & Russell, E. (2018, January 10). ‘We will be written out of history’: Feminist challenges to carceral violence and the activist archive. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 8(2), 267–287. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3099424.

  • Carlton, B., & Seagrave, M. (2013). Women Exiting Prison: Critical Essays on Gender, Post-release Support and Survival. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for the Human Rights of Imprisoned People [CHRIP]. (2010). Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Women in Victorian Prison: Update on Developments Since the 2005 Request for Systemic Review of Discrimination Against Women in Victorian Prisons. Melbourne: CHRIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerveri, P., Colvin, K., Dias, M., George, A., Hanna, J., Jubb, G., et al. (2005). Request for a Systematic Review of Discrimination Against Women in Victorian Prisons. Melbourne: Victorian Council of Social Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1981). Limits to Pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S., & Davies, S. (1999). Harsh Punishment: International Experiences of Women’s Imprisonment. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y. (2003). Are Prisons Obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice Victoria. (2005). Better Pathways: An Integrated Response to Women’s Offending and Re-offending. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice Victoria. (2007). Better Pathways in Practice: The Women’s Correctional Services Framework. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Opportunity Commissioner. (1991, May 11). Inquiry into Sex Discrimination at Barwon Prison. The Age, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Opportunity Commission Victoria [EOCV]. (1993). Inquiry into Allegations of Discrimination at Barwon Prison. Melbourne: EOCV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, K. (2000). Reflections on inside/out organizing. Social Justice, 27, 158–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flat Out. (2014). Strategic Plan: 2014–2016. [Online]. Available http://www.flatout.org.au. Accessed January 9, 2018.

  • George, A. (2002). Tales of a private women’s prison: Writ in women’s lives. Hecate, 28(1), 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A., & McCulloch, J. (1988). Women & Imprisonment in Victoria: A Report. Melbourne: Fitzroy Legal Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, M. (2006). The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, L. (1982). Prisoner and Female: The Double Negative. Melbourne: Victorian Council of Social Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K. (2000). Prisons that empower: Neo-liberal governance in Canadian women’s prisons. British Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K. (2001). Punishment in Disguise: Penal Governance and the Federal Imprisonment of Women in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. P. (2011). Heteropatriarchy kills: Challenging gender violence in a prison nation. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 37, 13–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidensohn, F. (1985). Women and Crime. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiner, B., & Tyson, S. (2017). Feminism and the carceral state: Gender-responsive justice, community accountability, and the epistemology of antiviolence. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 3(1): Article 3. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2016.3.3. Accessed February 7, 2018.

  • Kilgore, J. (2014). Repackaging Mass Incarceration. [Online]. Available http://www.counterpunch.org. Accessed November 30, 2017.

  • McCulloch, J., & George, A. (2009). Naked power: Strip searching in women’s prisons. In J. McCulloch & P. Scranton (Eds.), The Violence of Incarceration (pp. 107–123). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakawa, N. (2014). The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musto, J. L. (2016). Control and Protect: Collaboration, Carceral Protection, and Domestic Sex Trafficking in the United States. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. (1998). Fairlea: The History of a Women’s Prison in Australia, 1956–1996. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E., & Carlton, B. (2013). Pathways, race and gender responsive reform: Through an abolitionist lens. Theoretical Criminology, 17(4), 474–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schept, J. (2015). Progressive Punishment: Job Loss, Jail Growth, and the Neoliberal Logic of Carceral Expansion. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaylor, C. (2009). Neither kind nor gentle: The perils of “gender responsive justice”. In J. McCulloch & P. Scraton (Eds.), The Violence of Incarceration (pp. 145–163). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spade, D. (2011). Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. Brooklyn: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuma, E. (2014). Against the “prison/psychiatric state”: Anti-violence feminisms and the politics of confinement in the 1970s. Feminist Formations, 26(2), 26–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuma, E. (2015). Lessons in self-defense: Gender violence, racial criminalization, and anticarceral feminism. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 43(3/4), 52–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toner, P. (1982). Speech Launching Prisoner and Female: The Double Negative. Melbourne: Department of Community Welfare Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. [Online]. Available http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html. Accessed November 30, 2017.

  • UN General Assembly. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. A/RES/34/180. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/A/RES/34/180. Accessed November 30, 2017.

  • UN General Assembly. (2003). Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment. A/RES/57/199. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/A/RES/57/199. Accessed November 30, 2017.

  • Victorian Ombudsman. (2017). Implementing OPCAT in Victoria: Report and Inspection of the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Woman’s Prison Council [VWPC]. (1977). Biannual Report: 1975–1977. Melbourne: Victorian Woman’s Prison Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women and Imprisonment Group. (1996). Wring Out Fairlea Demands. Melbourne: Fitzroy Legal Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women Prisoners and Offenders Advisory Committee. (1991). Women Prisoners and Offenders: The Agenda for Change. Melbourne: Victorian Office of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Senior Lecturer in Criminology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

    Bree Carlton

  2. Department of Social Inquiry, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Emma K. Russell

Authors
  1. Bree Carlton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emma K. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bree Carlton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Criminology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Elizabeth Stanley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carlton, B., Russell, E.K. (2018). Entrenching Women’s Imprisonment: An Anti-carceral Critique of Rights Based Advocacy and Reform. In: Stanley, E. (eds) Human Rights and Incarceration. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95398-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95399-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation