Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reconceptualising Custody: Rights, Responsibilities and ‘Imagined Communities’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights and Incarceration

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

  • 1750 Accesses

Abstract

Reconceptualising Custody draws on developments for women in prison in Scotland to consider the influence of ‘rights discourse’ in reorganising the penal estate. Locating these developments within an international context, the chapter explores the flexibility of concepts of ‘community’ in the repositioning of custody and in attempts to create ‘benevolent’ spaces within the prison system. The chapter argues that an individual model of rights within institutional spaces cannot address the factors that contribute to imprisonment, sustain processes of criminalisation and that continue to exert impact post-release. The tension between the potential for achieving radical change and the legitimation of the existing system is evident in the creation of apparently benevolent spaces within which women are incompatibly both punished and rehabilitated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Hunger and Food Poverty. (2014). Feeding Britain: A Strategy for Zero Hunger in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. London: The Children’s Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Women in the Penal System. (2015). Report on the Inquiry into Preventing Unnecessary Criminalisation of Women. London: Howard League.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, T. (2013). Indigenous People, Crime and Punishment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, E. (2010). Women in transition: From prison to …. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 22(2), 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A., Corteen, K., Scott, D., & Whyte, D. (Eds.). (2011). Expanding the Criminological Imagination. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E. (2014). There is an alternative: Challenging the logic of neoliberal penality. Theoretical Criminology, 18(4), 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E., & Scott, D. (Eds.). (2016). Justice, Power and Resistance. Foundation Issue: Non-Penal Real Utopias. London: EG Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. ([1961] 1986). Natural Law and Human Dignity (D. J. Schmidt, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, C. (2003). Gender Responsive Strategies: Research, Practice and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Human Rights Commission. (2003). Protecting Their Rights. Ottawa: Canadian Human Rights Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (1983). Women’s Imprisonment: A Study in Social Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (2008). Imaginary Penalities. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (2013). Against rehabilitation: For reparative justice. In K. Carrington, M. Ball, E. O’Brien, & M. Juan (Eds.), Crime, Justice and Social Democracy: International Perspectives (pp. 89–104). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P., & Tombs, J. (2006). Reconfigurations of penality. Theoretical Criminology, 10(3), 337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, B., & Segrave, M. (2011). Women’s survival post-imprisonment: Connecting imprisonment with pains past and present. Punishment & Society, 13(5), 551–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Imprisoning women: The unintended victims of mass imprisonment. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment (pp. 79–94). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of Social Control. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Women Offenders. (2012). Commission on Women Offenders: Final Report. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correctional Services of Canada [CSC]. (1990). Creating Choices. Canada: CSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corston, J. (2007). The Corston Report: A Report by Baroness Jean Corston of a Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas, C., & Gearey, A. (2005). Critical Jurisprudence: The Political Philosophy of Punishment. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, R., & Souness, C. (2015). Evaluation of Sixteen Women’s Community Justice Services in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engender. (2015). A Widening Gap: Women and Welfare Reform. Edinburgh: Engender.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2007). Reframing justice in a globalizing world. In T. Lovell (Ed.), (Mis)recognition, Social Inequality and Social Justice: Nancy Fraser and Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 17–35). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of Feminism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K. (2001). Punishment in Disguise: Penal Governance and Federal Imprisonment of Women in Canada. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K. (2008). Re-imagining gendered penalities: The myth of gender responsivity. In P. Carlen (Ed.), Imaginary Penalities (pp. 193–217). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K., & Shaw, M. (2000). An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women’s Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, S. (2006). Imprisoning Our Sisters: The New Federal Women’s Prisons in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houchin, R. (2005). Social Exclusion and Imprisonment in Scotland. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B., & Ugelvik, S. (Eds.). (2012). Justice and Security in the 21st Century. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulsman, L. (1986). Critical criminology and the concept of crime. Contemporary Crises, 10(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N., & Zedner, L. (1995). Discourses of community in criminal justice. Journal of Law and Society, 22(3), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, E. (2015). Crime, Inequality and Power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidell Thomson Consultancy. (2015). Consultation Report: The Future of the Female Custodial Estate. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, N. (1997). Research into Drugs and Alcohol, Violence and Bullying, Suicides and Self-injury and Backgrounds of Abuse (Occasional Papers Report No. 1/98). Edinburgh: Scottish Prison Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, M. (2013). A healing place? Okimaw ohci and a Canadian approach to Aboriginal women. In M. Malloch & G. McIvor (Eds.), Women, Punishment and Social Justice (pp. 79–91). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, M. (2016). Justice for women: A penal utopia? Justice, Power and Resistance, Foundation Volume, 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, M., & McIvor, G. (Eds.). (2013). Women, Punishment and Social Justice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, M., & Munro, B. (Eds.). (2013). Crime, Critique and Utopia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Invisible Punishment. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L., Scraton, P., & Wahidin, A. (Eds.). (2017). Women’s Imprisonment and the Case for Abolition: Critical Reflections on Corston Ten Years On. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, K. (2013). Women, punishment and justice: Why you should care. In M. Malloch & G. McIvor (Eds.), Women, Punishment and Social Justice (pp. 197–205). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prisons & Probation Ombudsman. (2003). The Death in Custody of a Woman and the Series of Deaths in HMP/YOI Styal, August 2002–2003. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prisons & Probation Ombudsman. (2017). Learning Lessons Bulletin: Fatal Incidents Investigations. Issue 13. Self-inflicted Deaths Among Female Prisoners. [Online]. Available https://www.ppo.gov.uk/document/learning-lessons-reports. Accessed February 16, 2018.

  • Rafter, N. (1990). Partial Justice: Women, Prisons, and Social Control (2nd ed.). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. (2016). They will not look like prisons. Holyrood, February 5. [Online]. Available https://www.holyrood.com/articles/feature/they-will-not-look-like-prisons. Accessed March 23, 2017.

  • Scottish Government. (2017). Justice in Scotland: Vision and Priorities. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Prison Service [SPS]. (2015). From Vision to Reality: Transforming Scotland’s Care of Women in Custody. Edinburgh: SPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Public Health Observatory. (2016). Excess mortality in Scotland and Glasgow. [Online]. Available http://www.scotpho.org.uk/comparative-health/excess-mortality-in-scotland-and-glasgow. Accessed February 16, 2018.

  • Scraton, P., & Moore, L. (2007). The Prison Within: The Imprisonment of Women and Girls at Hydebank Wood. Belfast: Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretary General of the Council of Europe. (2015). State of Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule of Law in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Work Services and Prisons Inspectorates for Scotland. (1998). Women Offenders—A Safer Way. Edinburgh: Scottish Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. (1990). United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-Custodial Measures [Tokyo Rules]. A/RES/45/110. Adopted December 14, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. (2010). United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-Custodial Measures for Women Offenders [Bangkok Rules]. A/RES/65/229. Adopted December 21, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban Outcasts. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2011). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2011). The Criminological Imagination. Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK

    Margaret S. Malloch

Authors
  1. Margaret S. Malloch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret S. Malloch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Criminology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Elizabeth Stanley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malloch, M.S. (2018). Reconceptualising Custody: Rights, Responsibilities and ‘Imagined Communities’. In: Stanley, E. (eds) Human Rights and Incarceration. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95398-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95399-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation