Abstract
Evidence-based decision-making is an imperative for conducting effective policies, particularly in the case of aging. Systematic research can contribute to better decision making by clarifying concepts, allowing us to place an issue into a larger theoretical framework and by providing evidence on what works. It can help to assess the efficacy, efficiency and legitimacy of different policy alternatives. Finally, it can inform of the potential problems that could be faced and present evidence of the effectiveness of the adopted policies. This chapter offers a brief review of the contributions that researchers can make at different stages in the policy cycle.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aguilar LF (1991) El estudio de las políticas públicas. Ed. Miguel Ángel Porrúa, México
Ripley RB (1985) Stages of the policy process. In: Daniel CM (ed) Public policy theories, models, and concepts: an anthology. Ed. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall
World Assembly on Aging (1983) A neglected área in the field of population and human rights: ageing and the aged. United Nations, New York, pp 102–109
Immergut E (1998) The rules of the game. The logic of policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden. In: Steinmo S, Thelen K, Longstreth F (eds) Structuring politics. Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Miller ER, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, Riemersma RA, Appel LJ, Guallar E (2005) Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med 142(1):37–46
Lipsky M (2010) Street-level bureaucracy, 30th ann. Ed.: dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Cornia GA, Stewart F (1995) Two errors targeting. In: van de Walle D, Nead K (eds) Public spending and the poor. Theory and evidence. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Osuna JL, Marquez C (2000) Guía para la evaluación de políticas públcas. Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla
Lasswell HD (1970) The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sci 1(1):3–14
Caplan NA (1979) The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. Am Behav Sci 22:459–470
Newman J (2014) Revisiting the ‘two-communities’ metaphor of research utilization. Int J Public Sect Manage 27:614–627
Leviton LC, Hughes EFX (1981) Research on the utilization of evaluations. A review and synthesis. Eval Rev 5(4):525–548
Landry R, Amara N, Lamaru M (2001) Climbing the ladder of research utilization: evidence from social science research. Sci Commun 22:396–422
Mulgan G, Puttick R (2003) The case for new institutions. Nesta, UK
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caro-López, E., Velasco-Sánchez, E. (2018). Research in Public Policies for Aging. In: García-Peña, C., Gutiérrez-Robledo, L., Pérez-Zepeda, M. (eds) Aging Research - Methodological Issues. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95387-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95387-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95386-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95387-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)