Skip to main content

Safety Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Principles and Methodologies

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering ((STME))

  • 1685 Accesses

Abstract

Planning is a process which leads from acquired knowledge to new knowledge. Unknown materials, models, environments etc. can generate abnormal operating conditions with the risk of damage. Designers have a number of tools to protect themselves from this eventuality. The first concept that was introduced to guarantee the safety of a project is the safety factor. In general terms, a system has a safety factor when the collapse is expected with conditions markedly more rigorous than those provided as design requirements. However, in a vision closer to reality, the most correct way of addressing the problem consists in recognizing the probabilistic nature of each process in use of a product, involving not only artificial, but also human actions. Every product/service is naturally subjected to failures, but more than failure in itself, are the effects of a failure that give significance to the failure. Then not only the nominal functions (with no failures) but also the functions consequently to a failure must be considered as possible system’s operating conditions. In an initial presentation there will be set forth some basic concepts of system reliability as the probability of no failures, along with the tools most commonly used, such as FMEA which, by virtue of their semi-scientific content, take into account variables not necessarily “measurable” but, nevertheless, lead to a significant reduction of the risk associated with a “failure”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In practical applications we must consider only the case of values of stress and strength far from the respective mean values.

  2. 2.

    The demonstration in the following steps:

    $$\begin{aligned} MTTF=-\int _0^\infty {t{{d R}\over {d t}}{d t}}=-[tR]_0^\infty + \int _0^\infty {R(t)d t}=\int _0^\infty {R(t)d t} \end{aligned}$$
    (5.9)

    The previous demonstration is valid only for \(E[\tau ]<\infty \). See a discussion on this point in Example A 6.9 of [3].

  3. 3.

    We emphasize that the word “Concept”, used in Product development phase [4] as a clear, detailed description of the attributes and benefits of a new product that addresses the needs of the targeted customers.

  4. 4.

    The functions of the item can be identified by a QFD analysis, that must also include anomalous operational conditions.

  5. 5.

    Potential failures modes are due to faults in components.

  6. 6.

    This small team is a group of people with a full set of complementary skills required to complete a task, job, or project. Team members (1) operate with a high degree of interdependence, (2) share authority and responsibility for self-management, (3) are accountable for the collective performance, and (4) work toward a common goal. A team becomes more than just a collection of people when a strong sense of mutual commitment creates synergy, thus generating performance greater than the sum of the performance of its individual members [5].

References

  1. Allison (1990) FMEA: quality at source. In: Guidelines for using process FMEA, reliability engineering, Allison Transmission

    Google Scholar 

  2. Battazza M (2003) FMEA per la fabbricazione di un nuovo motore 125–180 cmc. Thesis a.a.2001/2002, University of Bologna, Engineering Faculty, IT, Relatore: A. Freddi

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birolini A (2017) Reliability engineering, 8th edn. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Business Dictionary (2016) Concept. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/concept.html

  5. Business Dictionary (2016) Team. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/team.html

  6. Carlson CS (2012) Effective FMEAs. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Connor A, Irizarry A (2015) Discussing design : improving communication and collaboration through critique. OReilly, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  8. DOD (1980–1998) MIL-STD-1629A, military Standard: Procedures for performing a FMECA (24 NOV, 1980) Military Standard, Commanding Officer, Engineering Specifications and Standards Department (Code 93). Naval Air Engineering Center, Lakehurst, NJ, p 08733

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ford Motor Company (1995) Potential failure mode and effects analysis. Ford Environmental and Safety Engineering, Handbook

    Google Scholar 

  10. Freddi A (2004) Imparare a progettare, vol 1, 1st edn. Pitagora Editrice Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freddi A, Olmi G, Cristofolini L (2015) Experimental stress analysis for materials and structures. In: Stress analysis models for developing design methodologies. Series in solid and structural mechanics, vol 1, 1st edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  12. Larsson O (2012) Reliability analysis, Lund university. www.kstr.lth.se/fileadmin/kstr/pdf_files/vbkn10/.../Reliability_analysis_121101.pdf

  13. Lidwell W, Holden K, Butler J (2003) Universal principles of design. Rockport Publication, l

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mikulak RJ, McDermott R, Beauregard M (2008) The basics of FMEA, 2nd edn. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Connor P (1991) Practical reliability engineering, vol 1, 3rd edn. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  16. RAC-FMD-97CD (1997) Failure mode distribution data CD-ROM 1997. https://www.document-center.com/standards/show/RAC-FMD-97CD/history/1997%20EDITION

  17. SAE J 1739 (1995) Potential failure mode and effects analysis. QS 9000 FMEA reference manual, SAE J 1739. https://www.lehigh.edu/~intribos/Resources/SAE_FMEA.pdf

  18. Wikipedia (2015) FMECA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Failure_mode,_effects,_and_criticality_analysis

  19. Wikipedia (2016) FMEA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Failure_mode_and_effects_analysis

  20. Wikipedia (2017) de havilland comet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Comet

  21. Wikipedia (2017) Fail-safe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail-safe

  22. Wirsching P, Ortiz K (1992) Reliability methods in mechanical and structural design. The University of Arizona, College of engineering, Aerospace & Mech. Dept., Tucson, Arizona 85721

    Google Scholar 

  23. WMG (2007) FMECA product excellence using Six Sigma. Warwick Manufacturing Group at School of Engineering University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/wmg/ftmsc/modules/modulelist/peuss/slides/section_12a_fmeca_notes.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Freddi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Freddi, A., Salmon, M. (2019). Safety Assessment. In: Design Principles and Methodologies. Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95342-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95342-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95341-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95342-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics