Skip to main content

Towards Foundations of Fuzzy Utility: Taking Fuzziness into Account Naturally Leads to Intuitionistic Fuzzy Degrees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 763 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 831))

Abstract

The traditional utility-based decision making theory assumes that for every two alternatives, the user is either absolutely sure that the first alternative is better, or that the second alternative is better, or that the two alternatives are absolutely equivalent. In practice, when faced with alternatives of similar value, people are often not fully sure which of these alternatives is better. To describe different possible degrees of confidence, it is reasonable to use fuzzy logic techniques. In this paper, we show that, somewhat surprisingly, a reasonable fuzzy modification of the traditional utility elicitation procedure naturally leads to intuitionistic fuzzy degrees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Belohlavek, R., Dauben, J.W., Klir, G.J.: Fuzzy Logic and Mathematics: A Historical Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fishburn, P.C.: Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley, New York (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fishburn, P.C.: Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory. The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Klir, G., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Luce, R.D., Raiffa, R.: Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. Dover, New York (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Mendel, J.M.: Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Systems: Introduction and New Directions. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51370-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen, H.T., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V.: Decision making beyond Arrow’s ‘impossibility theorem’, with the analysis of effects of collusion and mutual attraction. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 24(1), 27–47 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen, H.T., Walker, E.A.: A First Course in Fuzzy Logic. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Novák, V., Perfilieva, I., Močkoř, J.: Mathematical Principles of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, Boston (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Raiffa, H.: Decision Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Perkins Grant administered by the Grants Management Office of the El Paso Community College and by the US National Science Foundation grant HRD-1242122.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladik Kreinovich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Servin, C., Kreinovich, V. (2018). Towards Foundations of Fuzzy Utility: Taking Fuzziness into Account Naturally Leads to Intuitionistic Fuzzy Degrees. In: Barreto, G., Coelho, R. (eds) Fuzzy Information Processing. NAFIPS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95312-0_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95312-0_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95311-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95312-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics