Skip to main content

The Trace Formula and the Proof of the Global Jacquet-Langlands Correspondence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Relative Aspects in Representation Theory, Langlands Functoriality and Automorphic Forms

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((LNM,volume 2221))

  • 1122 Accesses

Abstract

This paper contains the material covered in the lectures I gave at the doctoral school Introduction to Relative Aspects in Representation Theory, Langlands Functoriality and Automorphic Forms held at the CIRM, Luminy, 16–20 May 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here all the characters have complex values; smooth means continuous; when H is locally compact and totally disconnected, a smooth character has open kernel, because open subgroups form a basis of neighborhoods of 1 in H, and there is a neighborhood of 1 in \({\mathbb C}^\times \) containing no non trivial subgroup of \({\mathbb C}^\times \).

  2. 2.

    If v ∈ V , then F v is isomorphic to \({\mathbb R}\) or \({\mathbb C}\) and D v is isomorphic with \({\mathbb R}\), \({\mathbb C}\) or the quaternion algebra \({\mathbb H}\). When v ∈ V f every perfect square is the dimension of at least one division algebra over F v.

  3. 3.

    When n > 2, \(G^{\prime }_v\) is no longer compact modulo its center, but the same holds; this is a deep result of Harish-Chandra.

References

  1. J. Arthur, L. Clozel, Simple Algebras, Base Change, and the Advanced Theory of the Trace Formula. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 120 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1989). ISBN: 978-0-691-08517-3

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Arthur, The invariant trace formula, II, global theory. J. Am. Math. Soc. 1(3), 501–554 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Arthur, An introduction to the trace formula, in Harmonic Analysis, the Trace Formula, and Shimura Varieties. Clay Mathematics Proceedings, vol. 4 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2003), pp. 1–263

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.I. Badulescu, Global Jacquet-Langlands correspondence, multiplicity on and classification of automorphic representations. With an Appendix by Neven Grbac. Invent. Math. 172(2), 383–438 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A.I. Badulescu, Jacquet-Langlands et unitarisabilité. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 6(3), 349–379 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A.I. Badulescu, Un théorème de finitude. With an appendix by Paul Broussous. Compos. Math. 132(2), 177–190 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. E.M. Baruch, A proof of Kirillov’s conjecture. Ann. Math. 158, 207–252 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A.I. Badulescu, D. Renard, Unitary dual of GL n at Archimedean places and global Jacquet-Langlands correspondence. Compos. Math. 146(5), 1115–1164 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. A.I. Badulescu, Ph. Roche, Global Jacquet-Langlands correspondence for division algebra in characteristic p. Int. Math. Res. Not. (7), 2172–2206 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.N. Bernstein, P-invariant distributions on GL(N) and the classification of unitary representations of GL(N) (non-Archimedean case), in Lie Groups and Representations II. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1041 (Springer, Berlin, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Bernstein, P. Deligne, Le “centre” de Bernstein, in Representations des groups redutifs sur un corps local, Traveaux en cours, ed. by P. Deligne (Hermann, Paris, 1984), pp. 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.I. Badulescu, G. Henniart, B. Lemaire et V.Sécherre, Sur le dual unitaire de GL(r,D). Amer. J. Math. 132(5), 1365–1396 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Borel, H. Jacquet, Automorphic forms and automorphic representations, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Part 1. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 33 (AMS, Providence, 1979), pp. 189–202

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.I. Badulescu, E. Lapid, A. Minguez, Une condition suffisante pour l’irréductibilité d’une induite parabolique de GL(m, D). Ann. Inst. Fourier Tome 63(6), 2239–2266 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Borel, Some finiteness properties of Adele groups over number fields. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 16, 5–30 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Booher, The trace formula for compact quotients, with an appendix by B.Conrad (2014). http://math.stanford.edu/~conrad/JLseminar/Notes/L12.pdf

  17. N. Bourbaki, Integration. I. Chapters 1–6. Translated from the 1959, 1965 and 1967 French originals by Sterling K. Berberian. Elements of Mathematics (Berlin) (Springer, Berlin, 2004), xvi+472 pp. ISBN: 3-540-41129-1

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Bourbaki, Integration. II. Chapters 7–9. Translated from the 1963 and 1969 French originals by Sterling K. Berberian. Elements of Mathematics (Berlin) (Springer, Berlin, 2004), viii+326 pp. ISBN: 3-540-20585-3

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Bourbaki, Algèbre, Chapitre 8 (Springer, Berlin, 2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Blasius, On multiplicities for SL(n). Isr. J. Math. 88(1), 237–251 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Bump, Automorphic Forms and Representations. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 55 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997), xiv+574 pp. ISBN: 0-521-55098-X

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Cartier, Representations of p-adic groups: a survey, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions, Part 1. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 33 (AMS, Providence, 1979), pp. 111–155

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Casselman, Introduction to the theory of admissible representations of reductive p-adic groups (2018). Preprint

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Clozel, Théorème d’Atiyah-Bott pour les variétés p-adiques et caractères des groupes réductifs. Mémoires de la Société Mathématique de France 15, 39–64 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Clozel, Invariant harmonic analysis on the schwartz space of a reductive p-adic group, in Harmonic Analysis on Reductive Groups. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 101 (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1991), pp. 101–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Deng, Induction Parabolique et Géométrie des Variétés Orbitales pour GL n, Ph.D. thesis, University Paris 13, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Delorme, Infinitesimal character and distribution character of representations of reductive lie groups, in Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 61 (1997), pp. 73–81

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. Deligne, D. Kazhdan, M.-F. Vignéras, Représentations des algèbres centrals simples p-adiques, in Représentations des gropues réductifs sur un corps local (Hermann, Paris, 1984), pp. 33–118

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Duflo, J.-P. Labesse, Sur la formule des traces de Selberg. Ann. Sci. ENS 4 2, 193–284 (1971)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Y.Z. Flicker, D.A. Kazhdan, Metaplectic correspondence. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 64, 53–110 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. D. Flath, Decomposition of representations into tensor products, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions, Part 1. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 33 (AMS, Providence, 1979), pp. 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Flath, A comparison for the automorphic representations of GL(3) and its twisted forms. Pac. J. Math. 97, 373–402 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. I.M. Gelfand, M. Graev, I.I. Piatetskii-Shapiro, Representation Theory and Automorphic Functions (W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Gelbart, H. Jacquet, Forms on GL(2) from the automorphic point of view, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions, Part 1. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 33 (AMS, Providence, 1979), pp. 213–252

    Google Scholar 

  35. I.M. Gelfand, I.I. Pjateckii-Sapiro, Automorphic functions and the theory of representations (Russian). Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obsc. 12, 389–412 (1963)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. R. Godement, The spectral decomposition of cusp-forms, in Algebraic Groups and Discontinuous Subgroups. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Boulder, Colo., 1965), pp. 225–234 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1965)

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Godement, Domaines fondamentaux des groupes arithmétiques (French) 1964, Séminaire Bourbaki. Fasc. 3(257), 25 (1962/1963)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Harish-Chandra, Automorphic Forms on Semisimple Lie Groups, Notes by J. G. M. Mars. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 62 (Springer, Berlin, 1968), x+138 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Harish-Chandra, A submersion principle and its applications. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 90, 95–102 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. G. Henniart, La conjecture de Langlands locale pour GL(3) (French) [The local Langlands conjecture for GL(3)]. Mém. Soc. Math. France (N.S.) 11–12, 186 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  41. H. Jacquet, R.P. Langlands, Automorphic Forms on GL(2). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 114 (Springer, Berlin, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  42. H. Jacquet, J.A. Shalika, On Euler products and the classification of automorphic forms II. Am. J. Math. 103(4), 777–815 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. A.W. Knapp, Representation theory of semisimple groups. An overview based on examples. Reprint of the 1986 original, in Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001), xx+773 pp. ISBN: 0-691-09089-0

    Google Scholar 

  44. A.W. Knapp, Advanced Algebra. Cornerstones (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2007), 730+xxiv pp. ISBN: 0-8176-4522-5

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. Knapp, D.A. Vogan, Cohomological Induction and Unitary Representations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. R.P. Langlands, On the Functional Equations Satisfied by Eisenstein Series. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 544 (Springer, Berlin, 1976)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. G. Laumon, Cohomology of Drinfeld Modular Varieties, Part I, Part II (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. J.-P. Labesse, R.P. Lannglands, L-indistinguishability for SL(2). Can. J. Math. 31, 726–785 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. C. Moeglin, J.-L. Waldspurger, Le spectre résiduel de GL n. Ann. Sci. Ecole. Norm. Sup. (4) 22, 605–674 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. V. Platonov, A. Rapinchuk, Algebraic Groups and Number Theory. Translated from the 1991 Russian original by Rachel Rowen. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 139 (Academic, Boston, 1994), xii+614 pp. ISBN: 0-12-558180-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, Multiplicity one theorems, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions, Part 1. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 33 (AMS, Providence, 1979), 209–212

    Google Scholar 

  52. D. Renard, Représentations des groupes réductifs p-adiques, Cours spécialisés, SMF-17 (2009). ISBN : 978-2-85629-278-5

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. Rogawski, Representations of GL(n) and division algebras over a p-adic field. Duke Math. J. 50(1), 161–196 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. J. Rogawski, Automorphic Representation of Unitary Groups in Three Variables. Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol. 123 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  55. D. Ramakrishnan, R. Valenza, Fourier Analysis on Number Fields. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 186 (Springer, New York, 1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. V. Sécherre, Proof of the Tadić Conjecture U0 on the unitary dual of GL(m,D). J. Reine Angew. Math. 626, 187–204 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. J.-P. Serre, Corps locaux, 3rd edn. (Herman, New Castle, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  58. J.A. Shalika, The multiplicity one theorem for GL n. Ann. Math. (2) 100, 171–193 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  59. M. Tadić, Representation theory of GL(n) over a p-adic division algebra and unitarity in the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence. Pac. J. Math. 223(1), 167–200 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. M. Tadić, Classification of unitary representations in irreducible representations of general linear group (non-Archimedean case). Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 19(3), 335–382 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. M. Tadić, Geometry of dual spaces of reductive groups (non archimedean case). J. Anal. Math. 51, 139–181 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  62. J. Tits, Reductive groups over local fields, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions, Part 1. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 33 (AMS, 1979), pp. 29–71

    Google Scholar 

  63. D.A. Vogan, The unitary dual of GL(n) over an Archimedean field. Invent. Math. 83, 449–505 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  64. A. Weil, Basic Number Theory. Reprint of the second (1973) edition. Classics in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1995), xviii+315 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Badulescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: The Spectral Simplification

Appendix: The Spectral Simplification

In this Appendix I recall the proof [Fl2] of the classical Lemma which allows a simplification of the equality between the spectral sides of the trace formulae. It is a classical step in the proof of correspondences, and has been used in this paper. At the end of the Appendix, I explain how to adapt Flath’s proof in [Fl2] to quasi-split reductive groups (instead of general linear groups).

Let V  be a countable set. For almost all v ∈ V  means for all v ∈ V  but a finite set. Let {F v}vV be a set of non-Archimedean local fields. For every v ∈ V , let O v be the ring of integers of F v. Let G v := GL n(F v) and K v := GL n(O v). On G v we fix the Haar measure giving volume 1 to the K v. Let G be the restricted product of the G v, v ∈ V , with respect to K v, v ∈ V .

Let \({\mathcal H}_v^0\) be the set of functions \(f:G_v\to {\mathbb C}\) with compact support and bi-invariant by K v. Let \({\mathcal H}^0\) be the space spanned by functions on G denoted by f = ⊗vVf v with \(f_v\in {\mathcal H}_v^0\) for all v ∈ V  and f v is the characteristic function \(1_{K_v}\) of K v for almost all v ∈ V , and defined by f((g v)vV)  =  ∏vVf v(g v). (\({\mathcal H}^0\) is the restricted product of the algebras \({\mathcal H}_v\) with respect to the \(1_{K_v}\), where \(1_{K_v}\) is the characteristic function of K v, like in Sect. 4.2.5.)

Let J be a countable set. For each j ∈ J, for each v ∈ V , let π j,v be a unitary unramified smooth irreducible representation of G v.

Assume that, for every couple j 1, j 2 ∈ J such that j 1 ≠ j 2, there is at least one v ∈ V  such that \(\pi _{j_1,v}\) and \(\pi _{j_2,v}\) are not isomorphic.

Lemma 1

Suppose given complex numbers c j, j  J, such that for every \(f=\otimes _{v\in V} f_v \in {\mathcal H}^0\) , the series

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \sum_{j\in J}\ c_j\prod_{v\in V}\mathrm{tr}\pi_{j,v}(f_v) \end{aligned} $$
(4.6)

converges absolutely to zero ( in \({\mathbb C}\)) . Then all the c j are zero.

Proof

Let F be a local non-Archimedean field and let | | be the normalized norm of F. Every unramified smooth irreducible representation of GL n(F) is a sub-quotient of a parabolic induced representation from a character \(|\ ^.\ |{ }^{z_1}\otimes |\ ^.\ |{ }^{z_2}\otimes \ldots \otimes |\ ^.\ |{ }^{z_n}\), (\(z_i\in {\mathbb C}\)) of the diagonal torus with respect to the parabolic subgroup of upper triangular matrices. Conversely, every such induced representation has only one unramified sub-quotient. See [Car]. Then the set of isomorphism classes of unramified smooth irreducible representations of GL n(F) is in bijection with \({\mathbb C}^n\) modulo the equivalence relations R 1 and R 2 defined by

  • \((z_i)_{{1\leq i\leq n}}\cong _{R_1} (z^{\prime }_i)_{{1\leq i\leq n}}\) if for all i ∈{1, 2, …, n}, \(z_i- z^{\prime }_i\in \frac {2\pi }{\ln |u_F|} i{\mathbb Z}\), where u F is a prime element of F, and

  • \((z_i)_{{1\leq i\leq n}}\cong _{R_2} (z^{\prime }_i)_{{1\leq i\leq n}}\) if \((z^{\prime }_i)_{{1\leq i\leq n}}\) is obtained from (z i)1≤in by a permutation of the components.

Using Tadić classification of unitary representations [Ta2] one may show that if such an unramified representation is unitary, then, for all i, \(|Re(z_i)| \leq \frac {n}{2}\), and the set with repetitions {Re(z i)}1≤in is symmetrical with respect to zero. This last condition of symmetry is sufficient for the unramified representation to be hermitian (i.e. isomorphic to the conjugate of its contragredient).

On the set \(\mathcal Y\) of n-tuples \((z_1,z_2,\ldots ,z_n)\in {\mathbb C}^n\) such that \(|Re(z_i)| \leq \frac {n}{2}\) and the set with repetitions {Re(z i)}1≤in is symmetrical with respect to zero put the induced topology by restriction from \({\mathbb C}^n\). The quotient \(\mathcal Y'\) of this space by the equivalence relation R 1 is compact. Put the induced topology on \(\mathcal Y''\) which is the quotient of \(\mathcal Y'\) by the equivalence relation R 2. The set \(\mathcal Y''\) is in natural bijection with the set \(\mathcal W\) of isomorphism classes of unramified representations defined by elements in \(\mathcal Y\). Consider the induced topology on \(\mathcal W\). Then \(\mathcal W\) is compact. Every class in \(\mathcal W\) is unramified and hermitian; every irreducible unramified unitary class of representations of GL n(F) is in \(\mathcal W\).

For each v ∈ V , denote \({\mathcal W}_v\) the analog space of \(\mathcal W\) for the group G v = GL n(F v). Let \(R:=\prod _{v\in V}{\mathcal W}_v\) be the product space, which is again a compact space. The points of R are collections π = (π v)vV that have the property that every π v is an (isomorphism class of) irreducible hermitian unramified representation(s) of G v. Not every collection with this property is a point of R, but any collection π = (π v)vV such that every π v is an (isomorphism class of) irreducible unitary unramified representation(s) of G v is a point of R. For every \(f\in {\mathcal H}^0\), define \(F_f:R\to {\mathbb C}\) by the formula F f(π) =∏vVtrπ v(f v). The set of all these functions verifies the Stone-Weierstrass conditions:

  • it contains the constant functions (consider f equal to a scalar multiple of the characteristic function of ∏vVK v);

  • it is stable by complex conjugation because, if \(f=\otimes _{v\in V}f_v\in {\mathcal H}^0\), if f (g) := f(g −1), then \(F_{f^*}=\overline {F_f}\) (indeed, if π v is hermitian, then \(\mathrm {tr}\pi _{v}(f_v^*)=\overline {\mathrm {tr}\pi _{v}(f_v)}\));

  • it separates points, because if \(\pi _{j_1,v}\) is not isomorphic to \(\pi _{j_2,v}\), then there is a function in \({\mathcal H}_v^0\) such that \(\mathrm {tr}\pi _{j_1,v}(f)\neq \mathrm {tr}\pi _{j_2,v}(f)\) (particular case of [Be2, Corollary 3.9 for example]).

Hence, the set of all functions F f, \(f\in {\mathcal H}^0\), is a dense subset of the set C(R) of continuous functions on R. Now, putting f = 1 in formula (4.6), the absolute convergence implies that ∑J|c j| converges. Then choose u in J such that |c u| is maximal. Suppose |c u|≠ 0. Choose a finite subset J 0 of J such that \(\sum _{J\backslash J_0} |c_j|<\frac {|c_u|}{4}\). The density result implies that we may find a function f such that

  • |trπ j(f)| < 2 for all j ∈ J,

  • |trπ u(f)| > 1 and

  • \(|\mathrm {tr}\pi (f)|<\frac {|c_u|}{2|J_0|}\) for all π ∈ J 0∖{u}.

Then

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}|\sum_{j\in J\backslash\{u\}}c_j\mathrm{tr}\pi_j(f)|\leq \sum_{j\in J\backslash\{u\}}|c_j||\mathrm{tr}\pi_j(f)|<\end{aligned}$$
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}<(|J_0|-1) \frac{|c_u|}{2|J_0|} +2\frac{|c_u|}{4}<|c_u|<|c_u\mathrm{tr}\pi_u(f)|\end{aligned}$$

which contradicts the hypothesis. Hence |c u| must be 0. □

Here is the generalization of this technique for other groups. Let G be a connected reductive quasi-split group over a local non archimedean field, let A be a maximal split torus in G, W the Weyl group of A, M the centralizer of A (so W is the quotient of the normalizer of A by M). Then M is a minimal Levi subgroup of G. Let P be a parabolic subgroup of G with Levi subgroup L. Let K be a maximal compact subgroup of G in good position with respect to P. Assume that the Hecke algebra \({\mathcal H}^0\) of left and right K-invariant functions over G with compact support is commutative. I will define a compact set \({\mathcal W}\) with the same properties as before, namely \({\mathcal W}\) parametrizes a set of irreducible hermitian unramified representations of G containing all the irreducible unitary unramified representations of G. It is known that the set X of unramified characters of M (here unramified means trivial on M ∩ K) form a complex variety endowed with the obvious action of W.

According to Cartier’s paper [Car] (I used his notation), for every χ ∈ X, the induced representation \(\mathrm {ind}_P^G\chi \) has a unique irreducible quotient which is an unramified representation of G, denoted by I(χ). Every irreducible unramified representation of G is obtained this way. If χ, χ′∈ X, then I(χ) and I(χ′) are isomorphic if and only if there is w ∈ W such that χ′ = . So the set of irreducible unramified representations of G is parametrized by XW.

Let X u be the set of characters χ ∈ X such that \(\mathrm {ind}_P^G\chi \) contains at least one irreducible quotient which has bounded coefficients (a unitary representation has bounded matrix coefficients). Tadić shows, [Ta3, Theorem 7.1], that the set X u is relatively compact in X. It is obvious that X u is stable by W. So the closure \(\overline {X_u}\) is compact and stable by W.

A representation is hermitian if it is isomorphic to the complex conjugated of its contragredient. The contragredient representation of a character χ is \(\overline {\chi (g^{-1})}\). We also know that the complex conjugation and the contragredient functor commute with parabolic induction. So using the classification, it follows that I(χ) is hermitian if and only if there is w ∈ W such that \(\overline {\chi (g^{-1})}=w\chi (g)\). If w ∈ W, then the set Y w of \(\chi \in \overline {X_u}\) such that \(\overline {\chi (g^{-1})}=w\chi (g)\) is closed, so it is a compact set. W is finite, so Y := ∪wWY w is compact. The set \({\mathcal W}:=Y/W\) has the required properties.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Badulescu, A.I. (2018). The Trace Formula and the Proof of the Global Jacquet-Langlands Correspondence. In: Heiermann, V., Prasad, D. (eds) Relative Aspects in Representation Theory, Langlands Functoriality and Automorphic Forms. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 2221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95231-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics